So I have an analogy that I think is useful for understanding our current obsession with victimhood — one that I think is more constructive than the common critiques. In the modern discourse we’ve created, a victimhood claim is like paying mafia protection money. I’ll explain.
When it comes to victimhood culture, I think people focus too much on what claims of victimhood allow people to *attain* and not enough on what it allows people to *avoid*. For people who want to understand political culture right now, the second is much more illuminating.
Most commentary and research about claims of victimhood and the adoption of oppression identities tend to focus on how these claims are intended as ways of garnering attention, status, material transfer, etc.
And it's very natural and intuitive to see people acting this way as selfish, opportunistic, manipulative, etc. But it may be missing the bigger part of the picture.
It's important to understand that this is very much a binary discourse. If you aren't somehow a victim or oppressed in today's society, then you can only be the other thing: Privileged. And being privileged in today's political discourse is just about the worst thing you can be.
It requires constant acts of submission, expressions of guilt, and a surrendering of one's political identity. That hollowed-out identity is then replaced with an approved set of beliefs that keep you in the good graces of elite culture. The downside is you are a zombie.
To be labeled privileged is to experience a political and cultural death. How to avoid this? The only way to avoid it is to become the other thing: a victim or some category of oppressed person. In other words, a claim of victimhood may be more an act of negation than affirmation
Oppression identity has sort of become an entry fee into political and cultural discourse — the only way you can participate confidently and with conviction, be fully heard, and guarantee that your beliefs won’t be easily dismissed because of your identity.
People naturally want political freedom and to be unburdened with a restrictive identity, but we’re increasingly setting up a system that requires highly divisive, exclusive, and alienating expressions of victimization in order to attain that.
And the impact goes beyond political expression. This discourse and the hierarchy it theorizes is increasingly impacting people’s professional opportunities and their standing in the workplace. There are real material considerations at stake.
This dynamic goes a long way toward explaining why we see so many claims of victimhood coming from the places you'd least expect it — among the professional class at elite institutions of high culture, academia, and media. In other words: The most privileged places in the world.
Any rational definition of “privileged” would apply to this class of people, and that’s precisely why the threat of “privilege” discourse to a person’s status is felt so strongly here and why the need to neutralize the threat is so acute.
So to me, this all looks like a protection racket — like a shopkeeper paying protection money to the mafia. And not just because it keeps you safe, but because it also *keeps the system going.* It is self-perpetuating.
When you claim victimhood, you aren’t just buying your safety. You are also affirming the discourse itself and increasing the pressure everyone else feels from it. Which forces more people to participate. An endless cycle.
Again, I think it’s easy to fall into a pattern of understanding this behavior solely through the lens of individual selfishness, opportunism, etc. And those things no doubt play some role — people respond to the incentives that are created by any system.
But it’s the system that produces that behavior, and I think it helps to take a more generous systemic view by looking at how all of us can become ensnared in these oppressive, viral systems of belief, and how the system can use all of us to perpetuate itself.
I guess what I’m trying to says is…maybe we're all victims in the end? ;)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shant Mesrobian

Shant Mesrobian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShantMM

15 Aug
My most problematic belief is that woke theory is a way for non-intellectual people to be intellectual.

To put it in less personalized terms: A way for a precarious cultural class to secure and increase its only source of status and potential mobility.
Not that I think it should be a problematic idea. There is nothing inherently good about being intellectual. It's not the same thing as intelligence.
But I suspect that much of its appeal and power is that it is a plug and play system of complex beliefs about the world. People like to feel and sound smart. And for a certain class of people, that is a necessity.
Read 10 tweets
10 Aug
A lot of people are confused right now about what the Left is doing to Alex Morse and why. And understandably so. But it’s a really instructive case for understanding what is happening on the Left in this moment. What’s happening is confusing for two reasons:
First, it's such an extreme act of political self-sabotage. Alex is the Left's chance to unseat one of the most powerful corporate-backed politicians in Congress, replace him with a young exciting progressive, and send shockwaves throughout the political system
The other reason its confusing is that the Left is doing this by adopting a conservative puritanical culture that aims to regulate personal behavior, which has always been more associated w/ the Right and something that the Left traditionally fought against in the political arena
Read 19 tweets
30 Jul
Joe Rogan is politically liberal, through & through. But in many ways, he is *culturally* conservative. That's why he reveals elite liberals' game so well. For them, politics is just a conduit for culture war. If you fail on culture, you are the enemy. Politics is secondary.
And to be clear, when I say cultural, I don't mean social issues. Because again, he is politically liberal: Pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, pro drug legalization.
By cultural I mean doing and saying things associated with conservative, working class, or rural demographics -- hunting, fighting, lewd jokes, political incorrectness, etc. These are all markers of non-urban, non-professional class pedigree.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!