Judge Bill Pryor's decision upholding Florida's poll tax on ex-felons is one of the most dishonest, misleading, and despicable voting rights opinions I have ever read. It is shockingly bad—an affront of the very notion that Americans have a right to vote. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7206…
This decision was inevitable after Trump flipped the 11th Circuit by appointing five judges, all of whom joined today's appalling opinion, which truly makes me sick to my stomach. This is an incredibly dark day for voting rights.
If Floridians want to restore voting rights to ex-felons, they will need to pass ANOTHER constitutional amendment, because Republicans have effectively nullified the last one—and the judiciary let them get away with it. What happened here is sickening and extremely ominous.
There are so many lies in Pryor's opinion. Lies about why Florida enacted a poll tax. Lies about how it operates. The decision rests on fictions rejected by the trial court yet unquestioningly embraced by the 11th Circuit. Pryor is peddling outright falsehoods. It is sickening.
The 11th Circuit's conservatives should've had the guts to stand up and say: Yes, Florida is forcing ex-felons into an impossible position by ordering them to pay this court debt, because literally no one—including the state—has any idea how much they actually owe. And that's OK.
Instead, the 11th Circuit hid behind a lie, asserting falsely that ex-felons actually can calculate their court debt and restore their right to vote. No. The court is lying to us. It is lying to you. This is cowardly, abominable gaslighting. slate.com/news-and-polit…
I just don't know how we are supposed to have confidence in our court if judges feel they can lie to us in the service of disenfranchisement. It isn't a fair fight if states can revoke a fundamental right and courts can just lie about the facts to give them a green light.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Joseph Stern

Mark Joseph Stern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mjs_DC

31 Aug
🙋‍♂️@MollyOlmstead and I wrote a comprehensive guide explaining the best way to vote safely in every state + DC—and how to make sure your ballot is actually counted.

Read it, share it, and make your voting plan NOW.

🙅‍♂️Do not wait until Nov. 3!🙅‍♂️
slate.com/news-and-polit… @Slate
In most states, Nov. 3 isn’t really Election Day. It’s just the last day to vote. You should not wait until the last day to do something this important.

A lot of you can vote in September. Almost all of you can vote in October. DO NOT WAIT UNTIL NOVEMBER. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Worried about coronavirus but fearful of USPS slowdowns?

Most states let you 💁‍♂️fill out your absentee ballot at home then drop it off at multiple locations.💁‍♂️

We tell you exactly how to do it—from requesting your ballot to confirming that it’s counted. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Read 5 tweets
27 Aug
At this moment, conservative media figures are crafting a narrative that black people attempting to disarm a white vigilante who was (1) illegally brandishing an assault weapon after (2) shooting someone in the head *deserved to get shot.*

It is racist and it is sickening.
We saw the usual suspects begin developing this narrative yesterday by framing Kyle Rittenhouse’s victims as bloodthirsty assailants rather than rightly frightened civilians trying to stop him from murdering more people with an assault weapon. Now it’s their party line. Vile.
By this morning, the narrative began firming up: The men trying to disarm Rittenhouse—who crossed state lines with an assault weapon he possessed illegally, then shot someone in the head—were actually just “attacking him,” and Rittenhouse had a right to shoot them, too.
Read 8 tweets
17 Aug
Federal judge blocks the Trump administration’s attempt to strip transgender protections from Obamacare, explaining (correctly) that SCOTUS’ Bostock decision means “sex discrimination” encompasses anti-trans discrimination. …d-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/123116892418.p… h/t @sarahposner Image
The Trump administration rushed out its anti-trans ACA rule just before Bostock came down, assuring us that SCOTUS would agree with its interpretation of sex discrimination.

“Its confidence was misplaced,” the court notes. …d-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/123116892418.p… Image
Wrote this when Bostock came down on June 15, feeling good about it today 😎slate.com/news-and-polit… Image
Read 5 tweets
5 Aug
By a 5–4 vote, the Supreme Court just lifted an order that had required the Orange County Jail to implement safety measures to curb its COVID-19 outbreak. All four liberals dissent. Read it: supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf…
In dissent, Sotomayor points out that the Orange County Jail "misrepresented under oath to the District
Court the measures it was taking to combat the virus'
spread," falsely claiming it had implemented safety measures that "it now decries as vexatious judicial micromanagement."
SCOTUS' five conservatives have quietly changed the rules regarding these emergency stays, but haven't explained why. Among other things, they've decided that they always understand the facts better than the district court, which is a radical shift.
Read 6 tweets
30 Jul
Big shoutout to everybody who hyped up the phantom threat of voter fraud to justify ID laws over the past two decades, laying the groundwork for a sitting president to consider postponing the election over phony concerns about its integrity.
I don’t think all Trump’s lunacies reflect long-standing pathologies within the Republican Party, but his obsession with nonexistent voter fraud does. The GOP spent decades convincing their base that voter fraud is rampant, giving Trump the tools to reject an election’s outcome.
November 2, 2020.

Trump purports to postpone the next day’s election, leading blue states to file an emergency appeal at the Supreme Court.

Brett Kavanaugh immediately circulates a memo urging his colleagues to dismiss the case as a non-justiciable political question.
Read 5 tweets
27 Jul
🤯There are a massive number of behind-the-scenes leaks from the Supreme Court in this piece and it’s apparently just the first entry in a four-part series.

My guess: Someone with intimate knowledge of the justices’ deliberations is mad at Roberts. cnn.com/2020/07/27/pol…
Niche request: Academics who are troubled by internal SCOTUS leaks, by all means Do The Discourse about whether these leaks harm the institution, but please do not scold Supreme Court reporters for reporting on them; that is our job.
The second entry in @JoanBiskupic’s four-part series has more revelations: Kagan helped Gorsuch see the light on LGBTQ employment discrimination, and Roberts assigned Gorsuch the opinion from the start. The chief wasn’t a late crossover, as I’d suspected. cnn.com/2020/07/28/pol…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!