29M w severe persistent asthma p/w recurrent exacerbations despite optimal LABA/intranasal steroids. Abs eos 1250, total Ig E 1500, CT +mucus plugging, central bronchiectasis upper-middle lobes. Originally from Mexico, now in Texas. Which of the ff tests is indicated?
1/10
Great job! The majority got the right answer, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).
Recurrent asthma exacerbations despite optimal asthma therapy & eosinophilia a/w mucus plugging and multilobar central bronchiectasis should raise suspicion for ABPA.
2/10
Aspergillosis, classified as saprophytic (aspergilloma), allergic (ABPA, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, allergic sinusitis), or invasive (pulmonary, other organs).
ABPA: hypersensitivity to A. fumigatus; can also occur from other fungi (referred as ABPM, M for mycosis).
3/10
Pathogenesis is poorly understood. Involves induction of Th2 predominant response to A. fumigatus in genetically predisposed individuals. Eosinophilic response causes airway damage.
4/10
Frequent asthma exacerbation, most common Sx. May have fever/new infiltrates, can mimic many causes of pneumonia.
Dx rests on a high suspicion for ABPA; requires a predisposing factor, & lab/radiologic features👇 bit.ly/2RhCgZi
5/10
Fleeting CXR infiltrates👇 is characteristic; seen 40-77% of patients but not specific. bit.ly/33pDgjE
Transient ("migratory") infiltrates may be seen in Loeffler’s, lupus pneumonitis, cocaine smoking, COP, radiation pneumonitis, etc bit.ly/3htY4vf
6/10
Bronchiectasis is also not specific (seen in asthma w/o ABPA). Findings of central bronchiectasis (affecting medial 1/2 - 2/3 of lung) in ≥3 lobes & high-attenuation mucoid (visually denser than paraspinal muscle) 👉 highly suggestive of ABPA. bit.ly/33pDgjE
7/10
Total serum Ig E, most useful test not only for dx but also for follow-up. It is the “pro-BNP” of ABPA exacerbation👇 bit.ly/33pDgjE; doubling signifies exacerbation, while a drop by 35-50% with steroid signifies adequate response to Tx (never normalizes).
8/10
Take note that demonstration of A. fumigatus (sputum, bronchoscopy, biopsy) is not necessary and is not part of routine diagnostics.
There’s quite a list of DDX to keep in mind👇So, choices provided in the MCQ are all reasonable options.
9/10
Oral steroid, mainstay of tx. No consensus on dose/duration (months to a year of tapering guided by Ig E). Experts recommend antifungals only after 1st relapse despite steroids bit.ly/2RhCgZi. IDSA recommends steroids+antifungals bit.ly/2RlyvSQ.
38/M w/ progressive loss of scalp, axilla, and chest hairs. Recently dx w/ HIV 6 mos ago when he developed dissem cryptococcosis. He has now been taking TDF/FTC, raltegravir, TMP/SMX, azithromycin, & fluconazole x 6 mos. Drug-induced alopecia is suspected. Most likely culprit?
1/8 Nice job! 52% got the right answer, fluconazole.
In animals/humans, fluconazole has been shown to induce telogen effluvium bit.ly/2MMnF9j, one of the most common causes of nonscarring hair loss (see Table 👇 bit.ly/38rTXyN).
2/8 Normal hair cycle: anagen (growth) 👉catagen (transformation) 👉telogen (resting) 👉 shedding. Cycle is asynchronous (no mass hair shedding). At any given time, 90% of hair are in anagen, 1% in catagen, 10% in telogen.
32/M, h/o HSV encep 1 mo ago (s/p 21 d ACV), on ceftri/metronidazole for sacral OM, p/t ER +delusion, fever, seizure. CSF: WBC 25 (L>N), ⬆️TP, n/l gluc,(-)HSV. Septic w/u all(-). MRI:
b/l temporal lobe enhancement ⬆️ from prior. Whch of the ff is the best Tx for this condition?
1/11
The group is split b/n steroids & d/c metronidazole. The answer here is Tx w/ steroids. Indeed, this is a case of autoimmune post-HSV encephalitis (anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis post-HSV). Good job @LemuelNonMD @LeMiguelChavez@adilrashid83@Orchid10Tree@KhalafSuha
2/11
Metronidazole-induced encephalopathy is predominated by cerebellar Sx w/ a distinct involvement of the dentato-rubro-olivary pathway on imaging. We’ve talked about it here before. Refer👇for further discussion
67/M w/ poor control DM, BPH, +10 d dysuria. T38.1, BP 120/80, +tender R CVA. WBC 14. U/A: 21 WBC, UCx: (-)bacteria, +Candida glabrata (fluc-R) x 2 samples. BCx(-), CT: +prostate hypertrophy. Has had no response to ceftriaxone. Has no Foley cath. Which of the ff is indicated?
1/15
The vote is split b/n micafungin and ampho deoxycholate! Thank you for all your responses!
Although micafungin may be a reasonable option, the correct answer here is ampho deoxycholate.
In this tweetorial, we will talk about Candida UTI and its treatment. @ID_fellows
2/15
Candiduria can be challenging as it can potentially indicate: colonization, UTI, or candidemia/disseminated infxn.
Candiduria from a clean-voided urine sample is uncommon (<1%); more commonly seen in hospitalized patients w/ an indwelling bladder cath.
2/20
For centuries, physicians have relied upon meticulous observations to dx infections. For many years, observation of the fever pattern provided physicians w/ important diagnostic clues. However, the advent of abx & advanced dx & imaging has changed this landscape. #idmesh
3/20
Swift initiation of abx & antipyretics make it impossible to verify historical descriptions of certain fever patterns. Hence, inquiry into fever patterns loses its clinical significance bit.ly/33iXCLs.
48M +cirrhosis, underwent routine large volume paracentesis. +Abd fullness, (-)fever, abd pain/tenderness, confusion. Ascitic fluid: light yellow, 100 PMNs, SAAG 1.5, Cx +pan-susc E. coli. WBC 8, Crea 0.8, bili 1.8. Which of the ff is best management for this patient?
1/5 Only 21% got this right: no abx, repeat para in 48H.
The dx of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) rests on finding >/= 250 PMNs/mm3 in the ascitic fluid. Most patients with SBP are symptomatic (only 13% with no symptoms bit.ly/3gp5nEU)
2/5
The patient in our case is asymptomatic (no fever, abdominal pain, mental status change 👉most common SBP symptoms) and the ascitic fluid is <250. This is a variant of SBP known as:
28/F, 38 wks pregnant G2P1, in clinic w/ dysuria. Labs u/r exc urine Cx + pansusceptible E. coli. Denies fever. No CVA tenderness. No PMH or allergies. Which of the ff adverse events to the baby makes nitrofurantoin contraindicated in this patient?
1/5 The majority got the correct answer - hemolytic anemia.
Nitrofurantoin use during pregnancy is category B (no evidence of risk in studies). Hence, it is one of the options for the Tx of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women.
2/5 However, its use is contraindicated at term (38-42 weeks of gestation), during labor and delivery, or when the onset of labor is imminent due to the possibility of hemolytic anemia in the neonate.