Today I want to do a thread about a hugely important report: the @WWF's

LIVING PLANET REPORT 2020

I'll also explain why this report makes me want to redouble my efforts to accelerate the switch to electric vehicles and renewable energy.
f.hubspotusercontent20.net/hubfs/4783129/…
Many followers know I devote my life to accelerating the adoption of renewable energy and electric vehicles.

But I actually don't do that because I like electric cars, wind turbines or solar cells.

So why?
Simple:

I want everybody to thrive and be happy and to avoid suffering.

That means that ALL humans have access to food, shelter, healthcare and safety which they can enjoy in relative freedom.

EVERYbody also means: animals can thrive, without being tortured to become our food.
In order to achieve that we must combat global warming (GW). GW means large swaths of our planet become less inhabitable, enormous flows of GW refugees, and nature cannot adapt fast enough, so it's a major driver in biodiversity loss (the 6th mass extinction).
Solar, wind and electric vehicles (with storage using batteries and efuels: e.g. by producing hydrogen) are simply the fastest and most cost effective tools to achieve these goals.

That's also why I initiated NEONresearch.nl at @TUeindhoven
But there is an EVEN DEEPER REASON for solar, wind and electric vehicles than combatting GW:

SAVING NATURE.

That's not just the treehugger in me talking. Without a well functioning natural system we can say human civilization goodbye. And we can't ignore the damage any longer.
So how are we doing with regard to preserving nature?

NOT GOOD!
That's what becomes very clear from this report.

But also:
THERE IS ENOUGH FOR EVERYBODY,
if we approach it in a less wasteful and (dare I say) stupid way than we are currently doing.
I think the report is not gloomy or dull.

It's gorgeously designed with beautiful photos, infographics and graphs supporting the text.

And it doesn't just lament. It shows WHY things happen and HOW we can change.

We can have our cake and eat it too, if we get smart.
Chapter 1 shows we are losing biodiversity at an alarming rate. It really helped me to wrap my head around what is happening.

Of course it has an activist streak, but I would not hesitate to recommend it as a high school or university textbook. It's that good imho.
If we look at the causes, 'land use change' is by far the most important driver. Simply put: demolishing natural habitats in order to grow food (mostly for animals we then eat) or biofuel.

That's also why I am weary of biofuels: they combat GW but can kill nature in the process.
Wind and solar on the other hand use relatively little land and that land doesn't need to be fertile soil. So solar and wind 'leave nature alone' while agro-based biofuels do not.

Caveat: not ALL biofuel is bad! So let's have a nuanced discussion about it. But be careful!
Back to the previous graph: that biodiversity loss is less in the developed nations is true. But it's because WE rich countries already wrecked the place in the past.

So it's time WE start using more of our wealth to save biodiversity where people have not wrecked the place yet.
One of the new things in the report is that it describes how plants and insects are under threat. They may not be as cuddly as panda's but they are the bedrock for larger species (such as us). And did I already say the report is gorgeous to look at?
Chapter 2 goes more in depth on recent changes and how humans cause these changes.
And it also shows why I bother my followers with food so often.

I know you are mostly interested in electric vehicles, solar and wind. And less so, in my promotion of eating more vegan. But even apart from animal suffering, the impact of our food on nature is enormous!
Oceans are in hot water also as the report states.

Overfishing and destructive fishing practices are number one on the list.

Global warming is number two.

Plastic pollution is number three. (Including tires of electric vehicles!)

Oil pollution is number four.
Chapter 3 looks at how WE need nature. It shows economics currently misses the picture and leads us astray.

(I've ranted about the irrelevance of GDP and economic equilibrium models with 'rational actors' before. See also my open access publication: hindawi.com/journals/compl….)
Chapter 4 uses these building blocks to address the question: how can we do better?
It shows we are finally using our computing power to get to grips with how we impact the world in a realistic ways. What we try to do with NEON for national and local energy systems, the 'Bending the Curve Initiative' is doing for global biodiversity.
It shows there is no need to be adrift in a world heading for an increasingly severe extinction event. We can use our wits to avoid the worst of it.
I've simplified their graph (page 120) to show you the 1st result.

Simply put:
conservation helps most
50% less meat is next best
sustainable agriculture has a big impact too

Do all three and we start regenerating nature almost as fast as we are currently degrading it.
And I think we can do even better than this. I think plant-based meat alternatives and 'cultured meat' will become tastier, healthier and cheaper than animal slaughter.

Just like solar, wind and electric vehicles are becoming cheaper than burning fossil fuel.
So the good news is: we can absolutely turn the tide around, and we already know roughly how to do it.

But to stop the assault on nature, and to leave this planet we all share and love a better place, takes unprecedented global effort.

Our generation must step up to the plate.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AukeHoekstra

AukeHoekstra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AukeHoekstra

3 Sep
New study underscores what I've been saying for years:
electric vehicles could become almost entirely CO2-FREE by ~2050 if you produce and drive them on renewables and power ahead with recycling.

Electric vehicles are really that much of a leap forward.
ricardo.com/news-and-media…
Direct download link if you became confused: ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/cl…
I especially like it that heavy 40t full electric trucks are finally showing up in official documents after being shunned for many years as 'impossible' for nebulous reasons.

(I think it was more a political compromise: we will push electric cars but leave trucks alone for now.)
Read 16 tweets
2 Sep
New study in @nature shows there could be severe repercussions to biodiversity if we don't carefully choose the sites for new mines that provide us with the materials for renewable energy.

But I think a bit more nuance is in order (thread).
nature.com/articles/s4146…
The decision to draw a circle with a diameter of a hundred km2 around each mine seems extreme to me.

That means every single mine can impact an area of 30 thousand km2 and together they impact 50 million km (37% of all land surface outside of Antarctica).
To put that in perspective: one mine in my country the Netherlands would affect biodiversity in almost the entire country (41 thousand km2) according to this report.
Read 9 tweets
1 Sep
I would like to take a moment to celebrate a victory for decency. Specifically the decency of @AngelaMerkeICDU who, faced with Syrian refugees on one side and populists at home on the other, declared in 2015:

"Wir schaffen das"
(We'll manage this)
theguardian.com/world/2020/aug…
It would probably have been easier to weasel her way out of this human responsibility. Most other politicians were contemplating how to build walls and paint these refugees as somehow less human and less deserving of compassion than their voters. But Merkel stood tall.
As @philipoltermann details in the @guardian, these words where quoted back to Merkel endlessly by heartless populists who hoped to turn the plight of Syrian refugees into political gain and reframe the efforts at humanitarian help into a terrorist invasion. They didn't succeed.
Read 8 tweets
1 Sep
The marginal cost of solar is approaching the magical number of 1 euro cent per kilowatt hour!

Latest auction in Portugal pegs the fixed-rate lot at 1.1 cent per kWh (25% less than in 2019).

It still boggles my mind how far we have come. (short thread)
portugal.gov.pt/pt/gc22/comuni…
I published an opinion piece about it in the Dutch Financial Time in 2007. I claimed that extrapolation of current trends could give us 1 euro cent per kWh in 2032. But I but admitted that might be too optimistic. Turns out I was too pessimistic!
I already knew price reductions in solar where making the expectations of many too conservative (maartensteinbuch.com/2017/06/12/pho…) but I would not have dared to predict that we could come close to 1 cent in 2020, anywhere in the world.
Read 6 tweets
31 Aug
Our recent study is on the front page of @derspiegel! Germany's most visited news website!

Translated title:
"Electric cars emit much less CO2 than assumed so far"

Let me give links to the original study and a quick article summary in English.
spiegel.de/auto/elektroau…
Here is a link to the study in English:
dropbox.com/s/xblk4g7zeboa…

Here in German:
dropbox.com/s/2gwq0yslascu…

The initiative for the study came from @Oliver_Krischer and @DanielDholstein and they translated to German.
Thx guys!

It will be on their website in two hours.
I would also like to thank Christian Bauer of @psich_en.
I don't know him but he took the trouble to give it an informal peer review and concluded (translated): "The study is cleanly executed and explains plausibly how big the advantages of electric vehicles already are."
Read 19 tweets
29 Aug
'Big Oil' is becoming small!

Energy became the smallest sector with just 2.34% in the S&P index that looks at the fortunes of the biggest 500 companies on the stock market. Down by ~5x in 10 yrs. It's another piece of writing on the wall showing the age of fossil fuel is ending.
My explanation (since 2007): as both the threat of climate change and the potential of renewables became clearer, people all over the world (researchers, entrepreneurs, politicians and prosumers) started to invest time and money in renewables instead of oil.

Also: we get richer.
I think this is overall an extremely hopeful sign: collectively (maybe using the wisdom of crowds?) we are able to diagnose problems and develop+deploy solutions.

(Energy is actually one of the easier and more profitable problems to solve.)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!