Pretty amazing to me that various blue checks are equating protest of the vile “cuties” movie with QAnon. The effort there, cleary, is to delegitimize criticism of normalizing soft core child pornography.
And it makes sense, since ...
... we’re pretty much obligated to clap like idiotic seals when an 11 year old boy does a drag routine on Good Morning America (you bigot).
The elites who have worked hard to normalize drag queen story hour and the sexualization of little boys doing drag know deep down inside what they’re doing is not substantively different than what the movie “Cuties” is doing.
That’s why they resort to whataboutism and deflection
For those who can’t see @markharrisnyc’s recently limited tweet deflecting legit criticism of actual child exploitation onto a baseless conspiracy theory.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is so much euphemism, coded language and obfuscation in these two @AP paragraphs that a casual reader would have no idea what’s at stake is chemical castration of and grown men exposing themselves to children.
That’s literally what this is about
They want YOU to be SUPPORTIVE of these things. They want to HIDE the reality of these things from YOU, and make YOU feel BAD for opposing them. Don’t let dishonest media outlets mislead you.
Do you want to “restrict the rights of transgender people” = Do you oppose mutilating and chemically castrating children? Do you oppose exposing children to public acts of indecency and sexual deviancy? If you oppose these things, AP wants you to think it’s “restricting rights”
The censorship machine is gearing up hard to come at @libsoftiktok. The simple fact is when prominent disseminators of info cover the weird shit you are doing with kids, it’s the weird shit that’s earning you the attention, NOT the people covering it!
It only took three tweets. People calling for ruthless censorship of the opposition also calling other people nazis, who’d’ve thunk?!
This person works at Harvard’s “Cyber Law” center btw, which is a euphemistic name for a place that specializes in secreting discourse policing.
Wild thought, but: Maybe stop doing weird shit with kids. Maybe that’s the problem. Stop covering your tracks with shitty euphemisms like “gender affirming care.” Stop encouraging them to exclude their parents. Stop giving them body altering hormones. Stop urging surgery.
“This is not about CRT, this is more about equity.” Is perhaps among the more dissonant interpretations of policy.
Big red flag too when media is basically in lockstep telling parents that what they’re seeing — racial affinity groups, racial “equity” initiatives that openly discriminate — and say “actually this is not CRT.”
They’re speaking past parents, deliberately, to obfuscate.
Reporters latch on to this technicality, at best, to summarily dismiss the concerns of parents and, at worst, to cast them as white identitarians.
(Never mind that liberal “equity” policies that openly discriminate based on race are unpopular in general.)
I'm not sure I've ever seen a more shameless treatment. This is basically left wing oppo wholesale. nytimes.com/2021/10/27/us/…
They open the story by basically attacking the mother and her child, who is now an adult and working in politics. It's truly fucking disgusting.
And then there's this recurring gaslight from left wing outlets.
If they're separating kids and teachers into "racial affinity groups" for instruction, if they're doing privilege walks, if they're discussing "whiteness" or "white privilege" as concepts, THEY'RE TEACHING CRT!
This seems super ominous, but all it boils down to is AT&T giving OAN a DirectTV contract not unlike the contracts it gives the “7 or 8” other lefty outlets, among them MSNBC, a network that actively helped whip the public into a frenzy of fire last summer reuters.com/investigates/s…
I know that wider media would never admit it and would find the idea utterly hilarious, but objectively, MSNBC puts out as much misinfo and invective as any other network, OAN included. It’s just that they are part of the media majority, and so they escape similar scrutiny.
You don’t end up with a MAJORITY of self identified democrat Americans believing in mid 2017 that Putin flipped actual vote tallies w/o the likes of MSNBC (and CNN) stoking election conspiracies.