Mike Konczal Profile picture
Sep 12, 2020 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
NYTimes has a 50y retrospective on Milton Friedman's popularizing of shareholder primacy, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” with line-by-line commentary from smart folks.

I discuss the essay in my book; some thoughts. /1
nytimes.com/2020/09/11/bus…
They skip what I take to be the most interesting and aggressive part: that a majority of shareholders must not be allowed to vote to adopt "social responsibility."

So it's not really about who gets to make decisions, but about imposing a specific notion of what firms are. /2
Even a critical response here assumes shareholder primacy is historically dominant and "practical."

But as Berle and Means noted, for decades before the New Deal shareholders were shedding legal powers as it was impractical for them to execute it under industrial capitalism. /3
That shareholders were in retreat for 70 years on purely practical, everyday-evolutionary grounds, and that they were quickly remade on an ideological notion of freedom as property

makes the creation of shareholder primacy a perfect example of "roll-out neoliberalism" to use. /4
Last, not many engage it (@oren_cass notably does) but the responsibility debate flows from a question-beg: whether shareholders "own" the firm and CEOs "work" for them. Both wrong.

Even in a book on decommodification as freedom you know I'm going to go there. (Pre-order!) /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Konczal

Mike Konczal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mtkonczal

Sep 11
Inflation came in hot. You can see tariffs are driving the price of goods higher, while the price of non-housing services isn't falling to compensate.

Shelter had a high month as well, but that is likely noise given their more general downward trend. The tariffs are here. /1 Image
Three-month core inflation pops to 3.6%, among the highest its been in a while (and in years if you exclude January bumps). Not the direction the Federal Reserve wants to see as the labor market is quickly slowing since Liberation Day. /2 Image
Meanwhile inflation is broadening. Here's percent of items that had at least a 3 percent (annualized) price increase over the last month, something Waller used to flag the 2023 disinflation.

I brushed this off and am surprised at its increase. ~60% for both core and overall. /3 Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 5
It's a bad number. Just 22,000 jobs, and with revisions June went negative to -13,000.

Worse, deeper into the data you can see that the theory of Trumponomics is failing. It's not too late to change course, but it would require dramatic action they won't take.

Let's dig in. /1 Image
They just narrowly dodged a 4.3% unemployment rate last month and got it this month, but these aren't rounding games. You can see a steady increase over the last two months.

Maybe it's noise, but it is the highest in years and, given everything else we'll see, it's worrying. /2 Image
Here's the breakdown by industry. The first theory of Trumponomics was that tariffs would build up manufacturing work and federal workforce cuts would free up workers for them.

That's failed. Manufacturing lost jobs almost as fast as the federal workforce (-12K vs. -15K). /3 Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 12
Core inflation was above expectations and had its highest print since January.

But I don't think that really conveys how much more elevated it is in 2025, as shelter disinflation continues to cover up higher services and goods.

This is worrying. Let's dig in: /1 Image
Here's core broken down by goods, shelter, and services. Goods prices are increasing from a negative trend, as expected from tariffs.

But non-housing services have picked up too, masked by the expected measured housing disinflation. /2 Image
If we dig into non-housing services, 'transportation services' is a driver. Much of that is airline prices rebounding after price drops earlier this year.

But some is from 'motor vehicle maintenance and repair', showing the line between tariffs and services is complicated. /3 Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 1
Job revisions have a well-known strong cyclical component; as the economy slows it is more difficult to estimate business births and deaths.

Here's average revisions as % employment for 18 months before and after a recession, from 1979 to 2025. It's negative in the slowdown. /1 Image
Or consider the last decade. Essentially zero pre-covid.

Sharply negative under lockdowns. But very positive when the economy was gaining millions of jobs back in 2021, as the models couldn't keep up with recovery. But then negative as that recovery leveled out in 2023-2024. /2 Image
Here you can see that with a longer-timeframe. This is very common.

The question right now, as it was in 2023, is whether the revisions indicate slowing into a lower stable steady-state (as it did then), or an actual downward freefall. 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1
This is a bad jobs report. 73,000 jobs would have been worrisome to begin with, but deeply negative revisions to the previous two-months wiped out much of the recent gains. 2025 looks a lot worse the further we get into it.

There's a lot to cover, let's dig in. /1 Image
First: revisions. Negative revisions naturally occur at the end of recoveries/economic turning points from complexities of estimating business births, deaths, and seasonal adjusts.

While it was negative in early 2024 alongside strong jobs growth, it is collapsing now in 2025. /2 Image
Middle column here is just May and June incorporating the revision, where private education and health services account for 170% of all private sector job growth.

Manufacturing jobs are being lost at a comparable clip to Federal jobs, -11/-12 in July and -13/-18 previously. /3 Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 30
The GDP numbers for the 2nd quarter, like in the first, are being driven by wild swings in exports and inventories.

While GDP rebounds for a still weak 1.22% in the first half of 2025, under the hood final sales to private domestic purchasers looks quite weak. Let's dig in. /1 Image
You can see this in the components of GDP, where investment (driven by inventories) and net exports are doing wild, probably historically unique, things.

But look at the last two consumptions prints. People are spending less, and it's a notable drag. /2 Image
With 6 months we can compare 1st half of 2025 to the 2nd half of 2024 and note that, across the board, GDP and labor market, 2025 is doing worse.

In 2024 everything looked great except for the unemployment rate; in 2025 everything looks worse except for the unemployment rate. /3 Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(