Veena Dubal from her testimony at the February 26, 2019 Labor Committee hearing on #AB5.
This is one of the lies she told to reassure professionals that they truly would be exempt from AB5.
She totally gaslighted freelance journalists with this long thread. As @Gunn4DG pointed out, "Employment regulations don't violate the Constitution 'unless we want them to.' So, you can go ahead and violate the Constitution if you feel like."
For someone disinterested in #AB5, Veena Dubal willingly retweets without challenge or commentary Lorena Gonzalez's piffle and misinformation on AB5.
Veena Dubal actively insinuated herself in UI policy as it pertains to independent contractors in order to own Uber/Lyft. She diverted PUA funds from hundreds of drivers in order to get them to apply for straight UI and prove they were misclassified.
Then, when Veena and her colleagues were called on this, she accused @wuzhappn1 of libel because she dared repost this letter and comment on it.
In her February 26, 2019 testimony to the Labor committee, she BRAGGED about her scholarship being used in the Dynamex determination.
As Michael Alfera, who is an attorney, has pointed out, the recording of their use of her scholarship in the Dynamex decision is as plain as day.
Yet, as @wuzhappn1 points out, she claims, "She is a 'private citizen' who has 'no role' in the passage of AB5. She is beyond reproach. Any critique of her policies is deemed 'harassment'" Notice how the CNET fails to mention her testimony before the Labor Committee.
When Dubal stops advocating in podcasts/conferences/print abt AB5/Prop 22, then she will become a private citizen & casual observer. Until then, she is a public figure and accountable for her words, actions & advocacy. She is not beyond reproach. She can and should be critiqued.
@Gunn4DG Yes, she is the embodiment of craft the law according to my purposes and not align purposes to the law.
@Gunn4DG And saying that unless you are a creative writing, you're misclassified? By what standard?! None of them interviewed anyone who writes for a living. I'm not talking about WGA or the journalist union stooges--I'm talking about people who actually do the work across platforms. /1
@Gunn4DG I have been paid for technical writing, editorial writing, creative writing, filmic writing, opinion writing, investigative writing, ad infinitum with and without my byline. 2/
THREAD: Here are some representations of Labor, lobbying organizations, and elected Reps who support #PROAct passage. Be aware, be warned, and where possible, VOTE THEM OUT.
@RepWilson is on House Labor Committees and championed the #PROAct. She has several challengers but Floridians need to coalesce around one in order to see her out.
@veenadubal loves to block as much as she loves to misinform and change the language to suit her ends. Here's a screen shot of the tweet that @dtr300 is referencing.
As Caribou Barbie rightly pointed out, Veena Dubal doesn't care about power being entrenched in fewer hands, as long as she and her Union friends control the hands. They have been on a coercive campaign to silence and cancel the rights of ICs, freelancers, and gig workers. 2/
Astroturf Rideshare groups like Gig Workers Rising, Ridershare Drivers United and others are a front to destroy support for #YesOnProp22, harass and doxx Uber/Lyft CEOs and anyone who aligns with their independent contractor model. /3
According to the site, glassdoor.com. An associate professor at .@UCHastingsLaw like .@VeenaDubal earns between $147,000-211,000 a year, and can earn cash bonuses of $15,000-17,000 annually. 1/
This does not include any earnings from articles, media appearances, and writing "scholarship" that elected officials use to change policy and control people's lives. 2/
I'm all about capitalism, but is it right for unelected officials to be this well paid while destroying other's ability to get paid and control their own livelihoods? Who gave them such rights? Why does .@UCHastingsLaw give them a platform and power? /3 #RepealAB5