Oh God. Pray for me. We’re doing a thread. There are 12 reasons. Here are 12 responses:
1. Power of the military to supremacists riots: federalism aside, he’s overseen the most contentious riots since the 60s, led by his political opponents, and hasn’t turned into a dictator.
2. Voter fraud: not even something within his control. Voter fraud is handled across all 50 states and, should it come to it, at the Supreme Court. He has no power here.
3. He might remain in office: this is just asinine. If he lost, and remained in office, he would be escorted out.
This is Democratic fan fiction at this point.
4. Outlawing speech.
The press has never been more critical of a president - and, as we saw during the Russian collusion hoax, in a way more baseless - than Trump. And yet, reporters get free roam.
Wonder why that is?
5. Controlling “lies as truth”
Two points: 1. Maybe Fox’s viewership is a critique on the mainstream media
2. The man got impeached over a hoax. Clearly the people with power over wielding lies as truth are, for the most part, not in his camp.
6. He can do whatever he wants.
No president has been held back more meaningfully from his objectives - rightly or wrongly - by the courts and Congress than Trump, at least since FDR.
7. More total control of government BS:
As President, he can fire lots of people. The Dems led an impeachment, in part, for firing people. So clearly it isn’t something he can do without any implications. Christ.
8. and 9. No one can criticize him without consequence.
*deep breath*
HE WAS IMPEACHED! THE OTHER POLITICAL PARTY LED A MADE FOR TV TRIAL BASED ON LIES FOR MONTHS!
(To say nothing of the 6 and 7 figure book deals that everyone involved got, OJ Simpson style)
10. Messianic delusions?
I tried to come up with a response. But for the love of God, Dems, just be better.
11.
Okay, I take it all back. This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen in my entire life.
If Trump was one iota the dictator you all pretend he is, you would be in prison for libel.
12. Yeah his fawning over dictators is dumb but my God, if THAT is your case for why a second term means we plunge into a dictatorship, you need to log off of this website, take a deep breath, have a stiff drink, get some fresh air, and find a hobby, you absolute lunatics.
I will tolerate just about every bad take about Trump in both directions, but to hear the same people who gnashed their teeth about ‘our norms’ pretend his re-election would doom democracy is a briefer too far.
I don’t care if you like him or not. This histrionic bullshit has no place in our society and I have zero interest in listening to anyone who traffics in these conspiracy theories.
I continue to stand in awe of the ability of the Democrats to fuck up what should be the easiest election win in the last 150 years.
The life of the Democrats is conditioned on losing. And life finds a way.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you remember how bad the media’s “Covid lab leak” - the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab - coverage was?
I thought I did. But it was a more dramatic example of uniform media malpractice than even I remembered.
So I revisited it. Buckle in, it’s long. ⤵️
It started in Feb 2020 when @SenTomCotton suggested looking into the CCP lab studying bats near the initial cases in Wuhan.
The media were outraged. In a since-updated piece, @washingtonpost said the idea was a “conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly debunked by experts.”
It wasn’t just WaPo. Shortly thereafter, @nytimes trotted out a similar allegation, calling the lab leak hypothesis a “fringe theory” and a “tale” designed to inflame social media.
@CNN’s @ChrisCillizza said Cotton was “playing a dangerous game” with his suggestions.
The reason I take screenshots is that I'm always paranoid that an outlet or journalist will scrap the evidence of a bad take. Maybe I should be giving folks more credit for standing by their inaccuracies.
Every so often I check back in on this, perhaps my all-time favorite headline from @NPR, only to see that it still exists in its original form, from April 2020.
I launched a newsletter, called Holden Court, about the media, what they get wrong & why it matters. The goal is to reach beyond what my 🧵s have on Twitter & to build a better recent history of media & media criticism.
You can sign up at the link in my bio. More ⤵️
At that link you can read my launch piece and get a better idea of what it is that I’m trying to do.
The piece also walks through a recent example of bad media coverage that I worry we’re already forgetting about: the start of Covid.
My general premise for the newsletter is that media criticism could be a lot better; more driven by what the media actually does and says and more set in recent context, rather than an impressionistic sense that the media is hopelessly off-track.
I’m launching something new, so naturally I figured the best explainer was a 🧵thread🧵.
Introducing Holden Court, my Substack about the media, what it gets wrong, and why it matters.
You probably know the drill, but more details & links to sign up in the tweets below. ⤵️
Holden Court aims to unpack media failures, particularly when the media misses in unison on important political topics. But I’ll also have one-off content, Q&A opportunities, a mailbag and maybe virtual (or even in person) happy hours, too.
That doesn’t mean the threads are going away. But the amount of context and nuance I can capture in a thread is limited. So the Substack will (hopefully) provide that more robust analysis, aiming ultimately at *why* the media misses the way that it does.
“15 days to slow the spread” kicked off four years ago Saturday, sending the media into perhaps its most deranged cycle of my lifetime.
I dove back into some of the worst lockdown media coverage from those early days.
Buckle in, this one’s long. ⤵️
The real worst of the coverage was when states started reopening. The media outrage was palpable. Republicans wanted people to die, we were told.
Remember @TheAtlantic’s “Georgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice”? You may’ve forgotten how wild the text of it was. I did.
But that wasn’t a one off sentiment. The belief four years ago among the media was that allowing people to leave their homes was tantamount to killing people.
@washingtonpost called it a “deadly error” — not in an opinion piece, mind you, but in a “health” news headline.
Another media conspiracy, this time that Trump attacked a Secret Service agent on Jan 6, imploded yesterday.
Remember when the media—in unison—reported the “bombshell” allegations as fact?
I do. And I’ve got screenshots.⤵️
You’re familiar with the story I suspect but just in case: when former aid Cassidy Hutchinson testified Trump had “lunged” for a secret service steering wheel on Jan. 6, the media rushed to print the salacious (& false) claims as true.
Here’s @NBCNews @CNN @ABC @washingtonpost
Trump was allegedly going to drive himself to the Capitol to take part in the riot.
That’s what @CBSNews @Independent @NPR @NewsHour said.