Palmer Report Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Biden has a large steady lead. Trump is self destructing. Only way we can lose this is if we waste these final 50 days fretting and panicking and letting pundits scare us into staying glued to our screens, instead of going out and putting in the real-world work required to win.
The pundits will use every trick in the book to try to scare you into believing that you're going to lose, and that the only way you can avoid losing is if you keep staring at the screen and panicking. It's how they get their ratings. Don't let them play you.
Even though Biden's lead in the polling averages has been remarkably steady all year and will likely remain so, you're going to hear the pundits start constantly using the word "tightening." They'll always point to one new poll out of context, while ignoring the polling averages.
In fact a number of pundits have spent the past month obsessively using the word "tightening" to try to get you to stay tuned in – and yet over the past month the polling averages have remained EXACTLY the same.
You'll hear pundits (on the left and right) insist that Biden is going to lose unless he makes some specific change to what he's doing. That's hilarious, considering he's already winning. But when cable news gets your adrenaline flowing, the silliness makes sense in the moment.
Pundits will insist that unless you join them in the panicked fatalism that they're using to keep you tuned in, you're not being "vigilant" enough. But that's ridiculous. No one is being "vigilant" by staring at a TV all day, or a Twitter pundit's feed.
If you want to waste these final 50 days fretting, I can't stop you. But please keep it to yourself. When you run around yelling "We're gonna lose no matter what," you're telling people on your own side not to bother making the effort to vote, because there's no point.
Mike Bloomberg said all along he'd spend big for the Democratic nominee. Now he's spending $100 million for Joe Biden, as promised, at a time when it'll have the most impact. Some pundits are spinning this as Biden suddenly being in trouble. Yeah right. What a joke.
Remember when the pundits insisted Trump would magically win because of Kanye, or Tara Reade, or Portland? Every few weeks they have a new doomsday narrative to scare you into staying tuned in – and it nearly always turns out to have zero impact on the election.
The pundits have turned us into codependents where we need to be told we're going to lose, we crave being told we're going to lose, we're comforted by the thought that we're going to lose. It's perverse. It does real harm. And they do it to us just to get TV ratings and such.
We didn't lose in 2016 because of overconfidence or complacency. We lost because of the Comey letter. Idly fretting and "vigilantly" staring at the TV couldn't have stopped that. You know what could have overcome the Comey letter? Voter registration, phone banking, volunteering.
If you want to win: go volunteer for Biden!

If you don't care whether you win: waste your time staring at the TV and nervously fretting over ratings-driven doomsday narratives.

If you're trying to lose: go tell everyone who will listen that we're going to lose no matter what.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

Apr 25
This is the part where everyone on TV and Twitter chases ratings and retweets by pretending Trump has a 99% or 100% chance of winning this Supreme Court ruling, when he really only has maybe a 30% chance. They know if he loses, they can just feed you some new defeatist outrage.
"But even if Trump loses, he'll still have won because things got delayed until now!"

"But even if we win 5-4, it'll still be a loss because it should have been 9-0!"

I say this with love: shut the fuck up.

A win is a win. Only people who WANT TO LOSE spin wins into losses.
As for all the doomsday hysteria being posted in the replies, as usual, none of it is even compatible with the facts.

If the majority justices want a swift ruling, there will be one.

If the majority of justices don't want this remanded, it won't be remanded.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 10
MSNBC spent all that time pretending Trump would never go on trial. Now that Trump’s first criminal trial is starting, MSNBC is putting discredited prisoner Michael Avenatti on the air and letting him lie about the trial. MSNBC exists solely to bullshit you into staying tuned in.
The problem isn’t simply that MSNBC is corrupt. The problem is that the cable news format doesn’t work. There aren’t 24 hours of political news a day. Some days there aren’t 24 minutes. So in order to keep you tuned in and keep the lights on, they have to bullshit you.
And if you’re saying “that’s why I only watch these specific MSNBC hosts,” you don’t see any of them condemning Ari Melber’s Avenatti stunt, do you?

Besides, every MSNBC has at one point or another bullshitted you with some scary narrative they had to know wasn’t going anywhere.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 25
I said there was a chance Trump might get lucky with the bond. So be it. This ruling isn’t going to save him from his overall downfall. For that matter he still might not be able to come up with the bond. He’s broke, senile, and his first criminal trial is in 3 weeks. He’s toast.
This is not “optimism.”

In spite of what some of you think, it’s not my job or my intent to “give you hope.”

I’m just trying to call it like it is.

Today was a rare win for Trump, but only an incremental one.

He’s still on a sharply downward trajectory overall. That’s a fact.
But today’s ruling is an excuse for the outrage addicts and panic addicts on our side to spend all day angrily ranting, while pretending that ranting is activism.

And it’s an excuse for the media and pundit class to milk these folks’ outrage addiction for ratings.

Whatever.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 17
Trump spends his entire speech sounding senile, giving us soundbites we can use to convince persuadable voters that he has dementia. Yet all we can talk about is "oh no, he said the word bloodbath, there'll be a civil war, we're doomed!" We're only helping Trump with this talk.
The entire reason Trump's handlers have him up there using words like "bloodbath" is to distract everyone from his senility. And it's working. Because we always tepidly and gullibly take the bait whenever Trump suggests he's magically able to overthrow the government.
Do we let Trump's use of the word "bloodbath" go unchallenged? Of course not. But to cower over it? Absurd. And it's not among the five most important things Trump said yesterday.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7
The "intel briefings" that Trump would get as the nominee would be pedestrian info. Nothing like what a President would get. It wouldn't be anything he could sell or use to his advantage. This is all an imaginary doomsday scenario being hyped for ratings. Stop fretting over it.
Besides, Trump got actual presidential intel briefings every day for four years. And then he stole a bunch of top secret classified information and read it in the bathroom.

There's nothing in his "nominee briefings" that would play on the level of the secrets he already knows.
No, Biden shouldn't "deny Trump the briefings." That would take a non-issue and turn it into a scandal that Trump could then use to his political advantage.

Twitter always wants the good guys to make a self defeating overreaction.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 11
You have to understand, this special counsel clown put that line in there about Biden's memory specifically to bait gullible suckers like you into defending Biden's memory, which keeps Biden's memory in the headlines. If you'd all just shut up about it, the story will go away.
Trump says something completely senile every five minutes. There's no possible way that a one-time mention of Biden's memory in a report is going to get any sustained attention, as long as Trump is out there saying senile things every day like this.
The only way the "Biden memory" story will still be alive in the mainstream media by next week is if you're still talking about, which is what tells the media to keep talking about it. Just stop talking about it, and it will go away. That's not always the case, but it is here.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(