IF there was a deliberate decision by a social movement to carry out the intended murder of two cops and IF there was an organized crowd chanting "we hope they die", some things would be true.
2. First, we would be immersed in an actual (not an euphemistic or "quasi") civil war. Horrible things happen in wars and the term collateral damage doesn't even apply: one group may be determined to eliminate the other.
3. This is not true. While there is a lot of tension in the country, there is no actual civil war.
Second, it would mean extremely well-organized, hierarchical structures commanding the group that no longer recognizes the government being challenged.
4. This is also not true.
I will share some things from the perspective of someone who has been a member of anti-government organizations in Latin America. More specifically, what Americans would call "hard left".
5. First, the murder of two cops simply doesn't make sense. There is no political gain, only loss. It hurts legitimacy. And one thing the leadership is responsible to defend and protect is the cause's legitimacy. It is fairly safe to say the offender (they guy who shot the cops)
6.
=> is not a member of any movement. If he is, it is fairly safe to assume that he is an infiltrated right wing asset. "Oh but he's black". So is Candace Owens. Being black (or latino, or Indigenous) doesn't mean that the INDIVIDUAL cannot be a right wing asset.
7. On the contrary, it means he or she is a very expensive and treasured asset for the right wing.
=> (the offender) did NOT act following the orders of the higher ranking members of the organization or movement.
8. Therefore, he and his act have NOTHING to do with BLM, antifa or whatever the right wing boogey man/scapegoat is at the moment.
Anyone who believes this is a leftist act is either stupid, naive, dishonest or another right wing asset, one
9. responsible for amplifying provocations, an extremely effective strategy to discredit, criminalize and persecute oppressed people's movements.
10. the video from the ER entrance claiming that "protesters" were "blocking" it and "chanting" "we hope they die" shows nothing of the sort. It is a bad quality and low resolution video showing 4 individuals who couldn't even repeat words together.
11. That is not a "chant". A chant is when everybody says or sings something together, in synchronized (therefore, organized) manner.
12. There is a concept in leftist organizations that goes back to the original bolshevik movement called "democratic centralism". For cultural reasons, it doesn't seem to work in the US.
13. Some variation of it will be used in critical decisions, though. That means critical acts are not only premeditated, but were decided and must be agreed upon by ALL members of the organization. That is obviously not the case.
14. There is a whole literature about stages of social tension in which we may or may not expect bursts of disorganized destructive action such as looting. Usually, research shows, they are initiated by infiltrated assets from the oppressor group.
15. Concluding remarks:
- the murder attempts are unrelated to police brutality protests in the US. It may be related to police itself or generic "powers that be", the only ones with something to gain from it.
16.
- there was not "crowd" "blocking the ER entrance". There were four random assholes crying stuff like "oinc, oinc", "die die" and other stupidity.
17. Any attempt to construe this as related to BLM, antifa or any other targeted movement by the right wing constitutes STOCHASTIC TERRORISM: it is the deliberate radicalization of the pro-fascist base to commit acts of terrorism against black people.
1. @Google , I'm a paying client and I would like to continue using your browser. Unfortunately, @Microsoft has infested millions of computers with a browser hijacker that redirects the default browser to a virus called @bing . This is a felony.
2. The next step was @MicrosoftStore's "clarification" that @bing is not a virus, but a legitimate browser. It is not. I am quite competent as a desktop computer user, having written my Ph.D. dissertation in 1994 in Win 3.1, the best MS version to this day. Bing is a malware.
3. Unfortunately, the US federal government "strongly suggests" residents to use @googlechrome as the browser to file official documents. I have proof of that. And now, I can no longer use @Google on Chrome because of the browser hijacker imposed by @Office
@NitaGhei 1. Hi, Nina, I read your great article, which called my attention for being an issue I have been insisting on for some time. First of all, let me offer you the link to my book on suicide where I tackled this issue (it's free for download):
@NitaGhei 2. I'm originally a molecular parasitology and then a Ph.D. in sociology of science, with an emphasis on scientometrics. The first thing that caught my eye was the misinterpretation of "opioid deaths" epidemiological curves.
@NitaGhei 3. Your claims about the curves representing entirely different sociological phenomena (chronic pain patient consumption X black market synthetic opioid expansion) is obvious for anyone minimally trained in quantitative analysis.
1. It's not ok to "educate" the public on the harms of whatever drugs, or xenobiotic substances, or however they may frame it, if they don't even know how many valances carbon takes and why.
2. It's not ok to "educate" the public on an epidemic, or a pandemic, if they don't have some fairly advanced statistics training and, specifically, epidemiology statistics training.
3. It's not ok to "educate" any audience about whatever it is that affects their physiological functioning if they do not have a proven record of higher physiology education (as in a diploma, not a "certificate").
1/ Tired of getting the exact same response from your office eleven times, between September 2021 and today, I decided to publish the case. You will probably continue to ignore my application, as well as those of thousands of other freelancers and immigrants. @SBAgov
2/ As you can see in the image below, you are requesting my 2019 tax return and the 4506-T form. I submitted these documents all eleven times you requested it, because it was necessary for you to reconsider your rejection. @SBAgov
3/ The fact that the reply email is always exactly the same, regardless of what documents I attach and what I write is evidence of the neglectful attitude you have with a certain class of clients to which I belong. You don’t examine certain cases, and you do not read our emails.
1. I am not sure if this @COPDFoundation program for distributing #harmonica s and helping COPD patients learn them is still up. I wish I had read more on this last year because it could have saved my Dad a lot of suffering.
2. This is my Dad's harmonica and the beginning of my own music/memory/something else journey. I gave it to him about 25 years ago when his harp was stolen during a break in.
3. Dad had COPD and his doctor prescribed breathing physical therapy. I couldn't enforce the doctor's orders - dysfunctional family issues. He died in June 25, after a few hospitalizations with dehydration and pneumonia.
1. Today I got my Hohner Marine Band and my Suzuki pro master.
Yes, they sound completely different from one another. Yes, they sound great, they are easy to hold and to play.
This is it for now.
2. Studying and playing the harmonica is probably the one single meaningful activity that I am able to engage with without pain or hesitation.
3. Because lifting is limited by the spinal injury for now, or done with pain, and writing has hit one of those hesitation points in which the writer struggles with precision, with necessity, with sufficiency, and with style.