I just collated the data from the four Special Counsel's Office (SCO) iPhone inventory logs, equipment return logs, etc. A few findings:
1—During the time covered by the docs, the SCO used 92 unique iPhones....
2—Four of the phone IDs appear in the inventory logs but are either missing or marked as "N/A" in the records officer's log (which is the source of the evidence for the wiping of the phones.)
One of the four belongs to Zainab Ahmad. Another belongs to Aaron Zebley.
3—Seventeen uniquely identifiable phones were wiped.
4—Peter Strzok's phone was the one sent to the DOJ IG Cyber for analysis.
5—I also figured out the names behind some of the JCON IDs.
6—By cross-referencing multiple tables it was possible to lift some of the redaction over the JCON IDs. Those IDs are highlighted blue here:
7—About the total number of phones wiped... The evidence still shows at least 27 were wiped, but the 17 uniquely identifiable ones is the most bulletproof number to use. If we count the ones wiped by OCIO prior to review, that makes 21. Lisa Page (not wiped be her)—22....
... add to that the 5 phones "reassigned prior to review" we get to the 27 figure I'm standing by.
8—Speculation considering that 4 phones were missing from the records officers log and 5 unidentified ones from from that log were reassigned, I have a sense that at least on of the 4 is part of the 5.
/END/
Missed a couple of JCON ID names:
HNA - Heather Alpino
BMR - Brian M. Richardson
UEA - Uzo Asonye
If folks can figure out some of these missing ones that would be great. I'm especially interested in LFW.
Update to #3 -- there were 22 uniquely identifiable iPhones which were wiped, not 17. (Lisa Page's phone is part of the 22.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the most important statistics about modern science:
"More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments."
Email exchange between Christopher Scott and Robert Johnston (Crowdstrike), Adrian Hawkins and Jason Lowder (FBI), and Michael Sussmann (Perkins Coie).
On July 27, Johnston says Chris Scott is the CrowdStrike point of contact for the DNC/DCCC hack.
That July 27, 2016, email is a good who's-who of the FBI team working the DNC hack, including some names I never heard before: Adrian Hawkins, Joshua Hubiak, J.K. Mularski, Gerald Cotellessee, Christian Schorle.
"The analysis also revealed that there were more than 600 party members across 19 branches working at the British banks HSBC and Standard Chartered in 2016. Both have drawn criticism for their response to Beijing's crackdown in Hong Kong."
"Firms with defense industry interests including Airbus, Boeing and Rolls-Royce employed hundreds of [Chinese Communist] party members, the analysis showed."
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost argues that the court SHOULD decide whether the Constitution permits state courts and state executive officials "to alter the rules by which presidential elections are conducted."
"The People need an answer, too. Until they get one, elections will continue to be plagued by doubts regarding whether the President was chosen in the constitutionally prescribed manner." -- AG Yost
The following 8 paragraphs of legal background in the Texas SCOTUS election case are a fascinating historical context worth sharing in a mini thread:
“The individual citizen has no federal
constitutional right to vote for electors for the
President of the United States unless and until the
state legislature chooses a statewide election as the
means to implement its power to appoint members of
the electoral college.”
State legislatures have plenary power to
set the process for appointing presidential electors:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the
Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.”
U.S. CONST. art. II, §1, cl. 2
BREAKING: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today filed an *election* lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the United States Supreme Court.
Texas brought the suit straight to SCOTUS. Key allegations:
1. Unconstitutional changes to election laws 2. Unequal treatment of voters within each state 3. Voting irregularities "consistent with
the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity
protections."
From the bill of complaint: "These flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections."