I have several threads on many topics related to Ahruf and Qira'at. I thought it would be better if I have all the links in one place for easy access.
1. The Origins of the Variant Readings of the Qur’an:
yaqeeninstitute.org/ammar-khatib/t…
2. Introduction to the concept of the 7 ahruf:
3.Were all variations recited by the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ?"
4. Are there multiple versions of the Qurʾān as some people claim?
5. Did the 'Uthmanic Mushafs include all the 7 ahruf?
7. Is it possible to prove that every single reading is attributable to the prophet?
9. Comments on the Interview with Dr. Shady Nasser:
10. Were the differences between the Uthmanic mushafs "scribal errors"?

More on the differences between the 'Uthmanic Mushafs:
11. Why did some scholars reject some Qira'at based on grammatical reasons?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sh. Ammar Khatib

Sh. Ammar Khatib Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShAmmarKhatib1

16 Sep
I received a question regarding a statement from Dr. Nasser's book (The transmission of the variant readings of the Qur'an).
Shady said that all 10 readers were all deemed weak in Hadith. Image
This is wrong. Some of the readers are classified weak in Hadith but certainly not all the readers.
For example, let's take a look at what the Hadith scholars said about Ibn Kathir who is regarded to be reliable, saduq...

تهذيب التهذيب: Image
تقريب التهذيب: Image
Read 8 tweets
1 Sep
Lately, many people have been bringing up the San'a' palimpsest to prove that the Qur'an wasn't preserved. This "discovery" is supposed to destroy the preservation "myth".

I will be addressing this issue in this thread.
1. Those people are just pointing out that there are variants.

Muslims already know this. No need to keep bringing up this issue.
2. They keep talking about variants which differ from the 'Uthmanic Mushafs.

We already know that.
This concept of readings differing from the standard text existed many centuries ago. Many of these readings are well documented and well known in the Islamic tradition.
Read 25 tweets
30 Aug
@PhDniX @AbuSafiyah1 @AverageJoeHamON
@JosephLumbard
@pillar6741

I was asked for my feedback on the issue of the preservation of the Qur'an.
First, I purposely don't comment on everything I read or everything people bring to my attention. Unfortunately, some people don't want to truly have a meaningful conversation.
I will discuss some of the Important points mentioned in the thread.
Before I begin, I would like to thank our friend @PhDniX for his efforts in trying to clarify some of the most complex issues in the field. He does that while trying his best to stay neutral and respectful of other views.
Read 39 tweets
28 Aug
Regarding the readings going back all the way to the Prophet PBUH, we don't have Hadith-style narrations that the Prophet read/taught/approved every single word/variant.
Most of the narrations we have regarding readings attributed to the Prophet are weak according to Hadith standard.
That's understandable since we rely heavily on oral tradition.
Read 7 tweets
23 Aug
I received some questions regarding the recent interview with Dr. Shady Nasser in which he covered many complex topics related to ahruf, Qira'at.
1. Some listeners were confused regarding the hadiths of the 7 ahruf and the possibility of contradiction with another hadith which was mentioned in the interview. The hadith stated that the Qur'an was revealed in 3 ahruf:
In short, I explained before in different threads that the Hadith about the 7 ahruf was widely attested and multiply transmitted from the earliest period in Islamic history.
Read 33 tweets
15 Aug
Why do we still write the word" ʿamr " with wāw at the end?
عَمْرو

Arabic scholars stated that the reason the wāw was added is to differentiate between the two words ʿamr and Omar.

See Adab Al-Katib by Ibn Qutaybah; Al-Jumal by Az-Zajjaji; Adab Al-Kuttab by As-Suli
ImageImageImage
However, Ibn Durustawayh was skeptical about this reasoning. He said that if we were to add the wāw to differentiate between similar words in orthography, the wāw will be present in many words. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!