Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
dikgaj Profile picture
@dikgaj
Sep 14, 2020 • 5 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
Hatred for "blacks"& natives disappeared in USA 18th to 20th c when its economy took off and was invested in heavily. But he gives the cliche: "Hindu-Muslim" issues upset business interests, that is, profits of a small subset of the people.
But why would "investors" suddenly stop investing if "Hindu-Muslim" issues are really that of a "fringe" group with no traction in society? When have jihad or its heavily state suppressed "Hindu" reaction ever stopped businesses? it didnt in Mumbai '92 or 2008!
If at all, "Muslim-Hindu" violence has been severely localized, restricted to a few towns or cities, and even after the rascalry of city-paralyzing jihadi violence - businesses, especially large businesses linked to FDI, have gone on unhindered.
given reality of scarce "violence",bogey of "Muslim-Hindu" violence hurts business "sentiments" raises two questions: if FDI is withdrawn it indicates either transnational links of such FDI to Islamist interests that tries to leverage FDI as tool of Islamic expansionist interests
or that FDI is not really threatened, but it is used as a bogey to try and make the Hindu the "good Hindu" who quietly allows the strengthening of mullahcracy without protest and by ceasing to be a "Hindu"..

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture
Jul 27
1)Another Britist moron vomiting. In Oudh alone during that war, his beloved Brits killed an estimated 150,000 Indians of whom 100,000 wr civilians. The one well advertised killing of European women came after Britshit general Neill’s campaign of wholesale genocide of civilians.
2) Britshit EIC troops went on a rampage right from the beginning, and went berserk when they began to win. Wholesale massacres, torching of villages, punitive rapes of Indian women, and that ubiquitous British taste for elaborate tortures, preferably on genitalia.
3) these are all laid out in boastings by Britshit officers and army men themselves in their memoirs and letters, which means they edited out the most sadistic parts but made no attempt to hide their pride in doing so and indulging in their tastes.
Read 6 tweets
dikgaj Profile picture
Jul 8
1) I don’t think people grasp the obvious “patriarchal” mindset behind all such revolutionary rulings. Here they fall back on dharmasutras written for a different time and society which no longer exists and which they also oppose in practice. This is done deliberately.
2) in the Hindu law texts there always was provision for surviving in-laws to “maintain“ the widow. But societal format was that the widow then stayed put with the in-law extended family and follow its rule’s and regulations. Some texts make this “staying put” very clear.
3) the staying put bit is indicated through recommendations for remarriage with a suitable member of in-law family or clan. There was thus no thought of allowing family assets to be split and carted away by a widow out of the family’s reach or her remarriage with an “outsider”.
Read 8 tweets
dikgaj Profile picture
Jun 4
1) Jihadis have not thought out Sarmishtha case fully. They and their patrons, think they can use full state coercion to make an example out of her - to gain Muslim votes, intimidate Hindu dissenters. But they r failing to sense the deep alienation and considerable anger in ppl.
2) this is not helping jihadi cause, as some think the leader of Rashidi foundation himself had openly abused Hindus/Hinduism online (screenshots were posted but not sure they still exist) but never faced the heavy hand of law and order the way Sarmishtha is being made to face.
3) sometimes whether by design (as in Dandi March)or unintended, people are given the choice between only two options. Who takes which side, shows up their true loyalties, commitments, affiliations and priorities. This case is taking a similar psychological space in popular view.
Read 6 tweets
dikgaj Profile picture
May 28
1) Every European country that has in the past, and continues to, facilitate, protect, and enhance Islamist movements or organisations outside Europe as part of Neo-imperialist foreign policy - are defenceless against jihadis on their own soil.
2) the reasons are wide ranging, historical, and twisted by the colonial interlude. The long stranglehold of a totalitarian church has created a social psyche that runs on a dominance submission paradigm and ironically the weakening and discrediting of the church leaves a vacuum.
3) the church weakened because it was totalitarian, just like the Soviet state as it collects all the dregs and charming psychopaths as the sole outlet for their perversions and ambitions without necessarily the talents for their people to flourish under their rule.
Read 12 tweets
dikgaj Profile picture
May 17
1) Mandal might be onto something. Let’s explore RT and ancestors dalitness. RT’s grandpa was treated as untouchable by his grandma for dining and more with Europeans, and bathed every time she had to come to his proximity. She being from same casta. But it gets stranger.
2) Dalit Dwarkanath sat at separate table from his European guests since Europeans were offered plates of “forbidden meat” and he wouldn’t eat it. He also practised “Brahminical” rituals. His wife and mother were strict vegetarians and practised orthodox rituals.
3) in fact apparently the first rift between the couple happened from his association with non-veg eaters in his business circle and the suspicion that he must be contaminated by association. And yet they were a Dalit family. 🤔
Read 6 tweets
dikgaj Profile picture
Dec 17, 2024
1) All borders are temporary compromises in space and time. Retreats and expansions are part of the process. Identities should not be linked to physical borders, even though never give up on territorial claims, even while retreating.
2) Country and nationhood are not identical, and they don’t have to be. However, their deviation from each other over long periods can only be resolved by the dissolution of one or the other, eventually leading to dissolution of both.
3) Sometimes existing power relations in a state form itself prevent the natural fulfilment of a nationhood. It becomes a state where every force within balances and wears the other out, paralysing the state. That is when the state itself becomes the greatest enemy of nationhood.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(