1) Jihadis have not thought out Sarmishtha case fully. They and their patrons, think they can use full state coercion to make an example out of her - to gain Muslim votes, intimidate Hindu dissenters. But they r failing to sense the deep alienation and considerable anger in ppl. 2) this is not helping jihadi cause, as some think the leader of Rashidi foundation himself had openly abused Hindus/Hinduism online (screenshots were posted but not sure they still exist) but never faced the heavy hand of law and order the way Sarmishtha is being made to face.

1) Every European country that has in the past, and continues to, facilitate, protect, and enhance Islamist movements or organisations outside Europe as part of Neo-imperialist foreign policy - are defenceless against jihadis on their own soil.

https://twitter.com/ofer_binshtok/status/1927739870643888483

2) the reasons are wide ranging, historical, and twisted by the colonial interlude. The long stranglehold of a totalitarian church has created a social psyche that runs on a dominance submission paradigm and ironically the weakening and discrediting of the church leaves a vacuum.

1) Mandal might be onto something. Let’s explore RT and ancestors dalitness. RT’s grandpa was treated as untouchable by his grandma for dining and more with Europeans, and bathed every time she had to come to his proximity. She being from same casta. But it gets stranger.

https://twitter.com/profdilipmandal/status/1688453071654060032

2) Dalit Dwarkanath sat at separate table from his European guests since Europeans were offered plates of “forbidden meat” and he wouldn’t eat it. He also practised “Brahminical” rituals. His wife and mother were strict vegetarians and practised orthodox rituals.

1) All borders are temporary compromises in space and time. Retreats and expansions are part of the process. Identities should not be linked to physical borders, even though never give up on territorial claims, even while retreating. 2) Country and nationhood are not identical, and they don’t have to be. However, their deviation from each other over long periods can only be resolved by the dissolution of one or the other, eventually leading to dissolution of both.

1) Some observations. Hindus, (and all those in other identities who find themselves aligned closer to Hindus than their community leaders) should not rely only on the country’s army to stand fast against jihadi aggression. They might. They may fail. But a bigger issue remains. 2) the army is conditioned to obey superior command. Their first reaction will be to obey the order. If the order is to hold back, or retreat, bulk of them will follow. The greatest weakness in national armies before jihadis is the vacillation or betrayal of their commanders.

1) The E.Pak army could easily paralyse jihadis. Two reasons it won’t: such a move can provoke jihadis inside the army to revolt, 2nd, the longer jihadis rampage, better army’s case for not handing over power to elected parties. Current arrangement works for three key players.

https://twitter.com/isoumiksaheb/status/1840789191095189745

2) the intention of international backers of E.Pakistan is to create a weak political regime (Ghazi Yunus is excellent for this with no real networks of power in a jihadist social base) dependent entirely on the army. As long as he can be the facade, army rule can’t be blamed.

1) Nice try. But USA, China, Pakistan form a threesome where India is concerned. Given all three’s record in attempting or managing to destabilise other countries, and all three’s links into Bangladesh, it’s a reasonable projection that they were involved.

https://twitter.com/derekjgrossman/status/1825343867702653367

2) Interim gov won’t go and can’t go against mullah networks in control of society. The interim gov wont displease an essentially Islamist society that has been consistently and increasingly Islamised under every Bangladeshi regime, via foreign agents, aid, and organisations.

1) Seemingly rational. But one has to be careful in giving rationale publicly to policies that help exactly what the enemy want. Here’s a long list of things here that range from wishful thinking to the dangerous. First is the line of appealing to reason in Islamic countries.

https://twitter.com/i_am_dixit_/status/1822516362385981849

2) the two primary arguments of appeal to reason to jihadis here is that (a) absence of Hindus among them will lead to intra-Muslim conflict destroying Muslims as a whole. (b) modern technological progress doesn’t come from Quran, and Hindus among them can provide that.

1) Such clarity does emerge in India too, but can only be expressed from outside India. There is an internal problem in Indian society and state because of its colonial derivative nature that deliberately sides with the jihadi simply out of fear and hatred of the majority.

https://twitter.com/meghupdates/status/1801513457784652123

2) the colonial intervention created a fundamental disruption between the majority common Hindu and the political, military, admin Hindu elite who inherited and adopted the world view of colonial masters that saw the common Hindu as the primary threat to their hold on state.

1) Was reading up on the British Tasmania civilising mission after a long time. The quintessential British character of hyper-hypocrisy on values, as shown in the scum governor Arthur or his scum solicitor general, was acting out in the same time as lead up to Indian war of 1857. 2) the British civilisers went out hunting native adults, capturing women for rape or sex-slaves, children as slave labour. natives fought back. So great Brit civiliser Arthur sent his men in chains of deniability to civilise natives by doing what they wr doing before on natives.

1) Israeli intel likely lost out because of their interfaces with those they deem or r forced deem as friends. The Hamastinian raid was planned for long, and too many western and US intel are embedded in Hamastine to not know. They made sure that Israelis were kept in the dark. 2) US, Euro, Egyptian or US linked Arab Intel wd hv collaborated pretending this wd help topple Bibi, and place an Israeli gov more aligned to US pseudo-left. Their handlers wd work with Hamas, and I am pretty sure that western media was embedded within Hamastine raiders.

1) Total bull. It was you who sought to disqualify a reality of Brit civilising claims because of the presumed location of the person protesting it. Location is irrelevant for the question. If an Australian kangaroo was able to say it, it too wdnt be disqualified.

https://twitter.com/deepika_joshi88/status/1717542114777829819

2) there is no country with sizeable popn that is able to stamp out trafficking, including current Britain whose image u sought to whitewash and falsely made equivalence between an arm of the British gov doing/covering for it/lying abt it with Indian army/gov that doesn’t do it.

RNIs get enraged if their beloved Brits actual history on ground in India is mentioned. Existing prostitution does not erase what the British did. Tweet was in context of rascal claim that Hindus were “civilised” by British. RNI Joshi got enraged because that was called out.

https://twitter.com/deepika_joshi88/status/1717414834130829687

Joshi is not a champion of any trafficked women. Her pretension of outrage seeks to deny that British army in India organised its sex slavery as part of its regular operations and wd use health concerns to both force innocents into it and abandon ostracise them after infecting.

1) Two things that still bug me in video of Israeli pregnant woman being cut open by jihadis without anaesthesia, gagged, held down -she is cut like an animal being flayed, the skin taken off all along the front. The one doing it is a real life butcher who practised on animals. 2) second, I dont get why she is being slapped. She is already gagged with tape, four jihadis hold her down by her limbs. She wd be half senseless with pain, and at best moan a little. They don’t want her to even moan. They are treating her like an animal in the slaughterhouse.

1) 75 years of India-Pak proves the insidious British two-state doctrine never worked when one is an Islamist majority. Israel will have exact same situation as India with two Islamist bases on two flanks. Yair is making a Nehruvian disservice to his ppl, pushing for two-state.

https://twitter.com/France24_en/status/1711772930810483145

2) The sovereign base that jihadis gain from two-state, is just a start of a long war maintained by the Imullahs who patiently nurture jihad ag the non-Muslim neighbour, erase any remnant "moderates" in order to eventually gain more territory and hopefully annex the neighbour.

1) This bull is propagated by both Islamists (of every pretension) and Anglophiles: armed overthrow of an obnoxiously exploitative regime was never funded or backed by the primary patronage circle that brought Gandhi over from SA. These had interests dependent on colonial regime.

https://twitter.com/mazmhussain/status/1708859781438443815

2) in sharp contrast, in Ireland, it was armed insurrection that forced the British ultimately to concede at the height of their global dance post WW1 - because Irish “parliamentary line” made common cause with insurrectionists, and American support was available.

1) British commander of naval grp sent to relieve Pakis in ‘71, Adm Gordon, whined to 7th Fleet commander: “Sir, we r too late…Russian atomic submarines here, and a big collection of battleships.” British ships fled west, US stalled before Bay of Bengal. Rahman ran to that UK.

https://twitter.com/zapalak/status/1700806140349862378

2) Wikipedia editor activists , likely of British-Bangladesh-Islamist axis, hv wiped off any memory of what British state actually wanted to do to the resistance in E.Pak. None of actual British complicity in Nixons intentions are mentioned. This was why Indira was wrong.

If it’s 1806 census, then Dwarkanath was a 12 year old boy. As far as is known he wasn’t entrusted with managing/buying real estate or any business at that age. His “family” had many ripe stalwarts and branches in 1806 on whom he wdnt hv any say either. This is intriguing 🤔

https://twitter.com/chubbybirbster/status/1668915980028747776

I was looking for the source of this, came across wild blogs that converted 43 rooms into 43 brothels, claimed Devendranath confirmed his daddy’s brothel ownership in his autobiography (none of the 4 editions available, do), a typical EPW piece missing bibliography by Moni Nag,

neo Gandhians detest Bose but co-opt him if they think they can get away with it. Bose had a more nuanced interaction with “Hindu” than nehruvian hatred of Hindus.Anti-Brahmin jihad is old church and jihadi anti Hindu trope. This one dubs me RSS not knowing what they say abt me🤣

https://twitter.com/hajindersingh2/status/1658305051637731329

Bose is hated and each hatred tells more about the hater than him. Congis hate him for winning party election against Gandhi and his trusteeship reduced to dynasty (dictator) model, anticipating ‘42 call which Gandhi imitated and as a Bong staking ldrship in national politics.

Two crucial acknowledgments: judges do show the propensity to stretch law&logic to reach prejudged conclusions, which, turn out to be in favour of the “wrong” side; “executive” by definition is “wrong”. But Shah is the only such bad judge as his rulings favoured those we hate.

https://twitter.com/livelawindia/status/1658345669973663744

In fact this piece itself illustrates the method: select stories that seem to support that the judge favoured the executive, omit those that might not. Insinuate that any ruling going in favour of executive is wrongdoing as executive has been prejudged to be wrong. But then….

1) My take on Californication: The enemy of the Hindu targets the Hindu in an obvious but piecemeal manner. It takes pieces of flesh out assuring the rest of the body that it is not targeting the body only its festering parts. I am both sad and glad at the pain its causing. Why.. 2) The segment targeted have been targeted by Europeans since the first Navarrese saint of the church to decide to cleanse the Indian heathen by whatever means that works landed in India, and his kind congregation found this Hindu segment the most unrelenting.