Day 5 of the Julian #Assange extradition hearing is due to begin shortly. I will be posting live updates in the thread below:
The US Department of Justice is attempting to extradite Julian #Assange to the US where he faces 175 years in jail for publishing classified docs through @wikileaks that exposed a slew of war crimes.

Watch the videos below, they'll bring you up to speed.

Julian #Assange has now entered the court. Julian, along with defense and prosecution teams are all wearing masks (only now?) after the hearing was put on hold last week due to fears of a COVID outbreak.
Judge Vanessa Baraitser says that wearing masks is not mandatory in the court. It appears there have been difficulties obtaining one for Julian, but he is wearing one now and Baraiter says he may choose to wear it at his own discretion.
The first expert witness to testify today at #Assange hearing is Eric Lewis of @Reprieve. Eric Lewis is an international lawyer and has lectured on human rights at Oxford.

Repreive's founder, Clive Stafford Smith, also testified to the court last week.
Judge Baraitser says it's "inappropriate" for witnesses to drink coffee in her court, as Eric Lewis takes a swig of his mug, berating him and @trevortimm for this impermissible breach of proceedings.
Fitzgerald QC of the defense will now begin questioning Eric Lewis.
Eric Lewis lists his qualifications. He is Cambridge alumni, taught at Oxford, has worked with @Reprieve on behalf of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and has extensive experience in field of human rights and intl law.
Lewis asserts the significance of Obama regime indicting Chelsea Manning @xychelsea but not Julian #Assange and @wikileaks.

Lewis: in the US no publisher has ever been successfully prosecuted for publishing nat sec information.
Lewis refers to the same WaPo article from 2013 we saw mentioned last week, where the DOJ said they had given up on going after #Assange.

Lewis also refers to Pentagon Papers as another example of publishers not being indicted for their work.

Lewis cites very hostile remarks made by Trump regime e.g. Trump saying #Assange deserves the death penalty or Sec. of State (then CIA director) Mike Pompeo's speech at CSIS in 2017 where he refers to @wikileaks as a "non-state hostile intelligence service".
Lewis also refers to Pompeo saying #Assange has "no first amendment rights"; then Att. Gen. Sessions saying "arresting Assange a priority" before charges even brought.

These statements indicate a concerted effort by the Trump regime to go after leakers

Lewis asserts that the superseding indictment brought forward by the DOJ got rid of the NYT issue and essentially singled out Assange.
In Lewis' view, charging #Assange amounts to an "abuse of criminal law enforcement", given the fact that none of the evidence changed and Trump is directing prosecution. None of the evidence changed, only the people at the top did (>further indication trial is political).
Lewis: AUSA Kromberg and prosecution fully aware that Obama admin had no legal grounds to go after Assange, yet charges are brought regardless, lacking any evidence or explanation.

Even in the best case, 20 years is akin to a life sentence for #Assange at this age
Lewis reasserts critical importance of @wikileaks and #Assange's revelations in regards to exposing war crimes. Malfeasance on part of the Trump admin in blocking investigations by the ICC @IntlCrimCourt in Afghanistan, case in point:

Defense has finished cross-examining Eric Lewis.

QC Lewis of the prosecution now takes his turn. I will refer to QC Lewis as Pros. (Prosecution) for clarity.
Pros immediately begins by asking Lewis if he's ever worked for Assange or being paid by #Assange.

Once again, this is a recurring theme we see from the prosecution, attempting to discredit and defame every expert witness that takes the stand as being biased in Julian's favor.
Prosecution points to previous comments made by Lewis where he publicly criticized #Assange's extradition.

Lewis: both my political views and expert opinion can be formed independently; this is by no means a conflict of interest (contrary to what the prosecution alleges).
Prosecution asks Lewis what exactly makes him an expert on detainees?

Lewis reasserts his expertise, having spent extensive time in jails, advocating on behalf of prisoners/clients. He also has a degree in criminology.

Pros snaps at Lewis for giving a "long" answer.
Prosecution continues to try and discredit Lewis by asking him whether he's ever written any articles on prison conditions and if they've been peer reviewed.
Prosecution asks Lewis about an acquitted client who was held under Special Administrative Measures (SAMs).

Prosecution asks if SAMs hindered his client's trial and acquittal in any way.

Lewis: Yes. Under SAMs gov chooses who can visit detainee, monitors conversations, etc
Important to point out, as did @Lawyers4Assange in open letter to UK Gov: #Assange would be placed under SAMs, as AUSA Kromberg has confirmed. Julian Assange would not only be placed in inhumane confinement but denied the right to a fair trial.

Lewis tells the court that if #Assange is extradited to the US, he will be placed in pre-trial detention at Alexandria Detention Center (ADC) in Virginia.

Lewis: the government wouldn't call it that, but it is still effectively solitary confinement.
Lewis: under SAMs detainees aren't allowed breaks unless no other prisoners are around.

Meaning one has to wait until 3am perhaps, when everyone is asleep just to get some exercise.

Keep in mind this is in pre-trial detention before even being convicted of a crime.
James Lewis QC of the prosecution asks Judge to cut video link for 15 mins and complains he cannot stick to time limit when cross examining the expert witness (Eric Lewis) because his answers are too long.

Dude asks questions then gets mad when people actually answer them lol.
Court resumes after exchange between Prosecution and Judge. No changes made to time limits on cross-examination of witnesses, Baraitser tells prosecution to get on with it and pros apologizes.
Expert witness Eric Lewis is back on via video link.

Lewis asserts that indeed the government might cite mental health reasons or notoriety to place #Assange in solitary confinement. Those might appear as legit concerns on paper, but there's no way to counter those measures.
Prosecution are trying to assert with Lewis that SAMs and administrative segregation are allegedly not in violation of Art. 6 European Convention on Human Rights (the right to a fair trial).
Everything #Assange faces by being extradited to US is in violation not just of the 2003 US-UK extradition treaty but Article 3 (against torture and inhumane treatment) and Article 6 (right to fair trial) of ECHR.

See open letter from @Lawyers4Assange

Just want to take a moment to say fuck the UK and US for this entire #Assange sham trial and their catalogue of war crimes. All of it.
Prosecution states that Lewis' arguments that SAMs and ad-seg violated Babar Ahmad's rights under Articles 3 and 6 of the ECHR were previously rejected in court.
Lewis argues that the slew of war crimes exposed by @wikileaks (and their political nature) as well as #Assange's mental health issues as a result of prolonged confinement and arbitrary imprisonment make his case unique.
Lewis: the effects of Special Administrative Measures and administrative segregation (read: solitary confinement) would be extremely detrimental and harmful to #Assange given the unique nature of his case.
The roadblocks and obstacles imposed by SAMs (alleged recordings of conversations, pre-approved list of visitors and legal counsel, only one phone call a month, no access to news) would impede Julian's ability to build a solid defense and coordinate with his team.
Prosecution alleges that since #Assange is not a terrorist, it's not likely he'll be placed under harsh SAMs or ad-seg; Att. Gen. William Barr will decide at his own discretion based on pertinence to national security.
Lewis says that if extradited #Assange risks being detained at federal supermax prison ADX Florence, in Colorado. Lewis quotes Robert Hood, the warden of the prison who said: "it is far much worse than death"
Prosecution says Lewis has no authority or expertise to comment on potential risks to #Assange's mental health because he is not a doctor.

Prosecution proceeds to attack Lewis' credibility because he asks to reference documents in order to answer the questions. Ridiculous.
Incidentally, multiple MDs have called for Assange's release since James Lewis QC seems to be so adamant in obtaining testimony from licensed physicians.

It really speaks volumes that this kangaroo court which is attempting to extradite #Assange on bogus allegations of cyber crimes can't even get a video link working. There have been technical issues every single day of proceedings.
Courtroom is in complete chaos with multiple journalists locked out of live feed. Eric Lewis of @Reprieve who is testifying on #Assange can be heard by some members of the press but not by people physically at the court.
Maybe Crown Prosecution Service @cpsuk can ask UC Global if they'll lend a hand to fix the court video link. I hear they have years of experience after spying on #Assange for the CIA in the Ecuadorian embassy.

After 2 hours of technical issues court has been adjourned until tomorrow morning. Will be going live shortly to give a summary of today's proceedings in the #Assange hearing. Subscribe for independent journalism:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Richard Medhurst

Richard Medhurst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @richimedhurst

14 Oct
"Heavy clashes in Beirut" is a weird way of saying that Hezbollah and Amal protestors were shot at by snipers.
People went out today to protest peacefully against a judge involved in the investigation of the Beirut port explosion. Snipers began firing at the protestors with clear intent to kill, not disperse, as the casualties have head wounds. 3 dead, 20 wounded as of now.
Amal movement + Hezbollah have released an official statement condemning the attack, asking people not to retaliate, in order to avoid escalation. For there are some who would surely favor that and like to plunge Lebanon into chaos...
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep
Pay attention.

Omar, Presley etc voted ‘no’ to fund Iron Dome, while AOC switched from ‘no’ to ‘present’.

In July they did the exact opposite: Omar, Presley etc voted yes to give israel unconditional aid, while AOC, Tlaib voted ‘no’.

See what’s going on here? This is a game.
Why would they vote to give israel arms in July and then vote against the Iron Dome in September?

Because in July the bill barely passed with 217 votes. AOC could afford to vote no and keep up the act, while Omar, Presley, Bowman gave the needed votes to make sure it passes.
Yesterday it was a slam dunk with 420 yes votes. No way it was going to fail so Omar, Presley etc were able to vote no, knowing it won’t affect the bill’s passage. AOC is such a coward she couldn’t even vote no, and switched to present instead.
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
AOC cries crocodile tears on the House floor as she votes 'No' to funding israel's Iron Dome -- then switches her vote to 'Present' at the last minute. Absolute cowardice. Will no one take a stand for Palestinians?

This is AOC pretending to give a shit about Palestinians and stay on-brand -- while not really standing in the way of Western and israeli interests. She wants a long career in DC and has strong ambitions, and as everyone knows, you can't say no to israel.
House overwhelmingly approving funding for Iron Dome 420-9

Tlaib, Carson, Omar, Massie, Newman, Pressley, Garcia, Grijalva, Bush all voted no.

AOC is the only present vote along with Hank Johnson
Read 10 tweets
21 Sep
Finally progressives do something good: using their leverage as a bloc to cut money to israel — well done. This is how you do it.
Bowman says Pelosi introduced the Iron Dome money at last minute. Likely to try and get Republican support. Apparently didn’t work b/c they don’t want to raise debt ceiling. Now Reps are calling progressives anti-Semitic— even though they were going to vote no as well (??) lol
“But the iron dome is only defensive!!”. That’s funny. So the Israelis illegally occupy Palestine and Syria, but because the Iron Dome shoots down other rockets it’s now defensive? Lmao. An occupying force is an aggressor by definition, and ID supports their illegal occupation.
Read 7 tweets
2 Sep
Israel bombing Syria right now
I’ve lost count already how many times they have bombed Syria this year, never mind the last ten years. Israelis themselves admit its in the hundreds
Syrian air defense batteries are engaging the israeli warplanes over Damascus
Read 6 tweets
1 Sep
Why do Democrats keep saying they're "leaving their allies behind". Is Dick Cheney in Kabul?
The newly McCarthyite wing of the US regime in unison with neocons. Ah, what a sight.
When Trump "withdrew" from Syria (he didn't, he just moved US forces to the East to steal oil) Dems not only ignored this but advocated a continued occupation of northern Syria with: the US mustn't leave its Kurdish allies. But the US will do this ultimately, that's its nature.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!