Dale Johnson Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Today's VAR thread is mainly a handball special.

- Explaining why the Liverpool penalty was correct (including quotes from UEFA refs' chief)
- How law change brought a goal for Gabriel
- Possible Newcastle handball

Plus a bit on pitchside monitor use.
Let's start with the penalty given to Liverpool for the handball by Leeds' Robin Koch.

This passage from the official Prem website, and the Laws of the Game, has been doing the rounds. It suggests that all deflections onto the hand cannot be an offence. It's not the case.
As is the case with many laws as written in the basic LOTG, they only touch the surface of interpretation and application.

Remember, until this summer the LOTG never said in black and white which part of the arm was handball. It was learned/trained knowledge.
The handball law, as it is now, came into forced in the summer of 2019.

So to give proper context for handball following a deflection, let's take the quotes from UEFA's head of referees, Roberto Rossetti. These were given in January 2019 ahead of the law coming in.
Roberto Rossetti said of deflections leading to handball: "The big challenge is the position of the arm ... If the defender is making the body bigger in order to block the ball it is not fair.

"It is different if the defender is challenging or playing the ball and it rebounds."
Roberto Rossetti continues: "If he is looking to block a cross or a shot on goal and the player is trying to spread his body then it is a handball."

So there are two key points:
1) Position of the arm
2) Is it is deliberate play of the ball or a block?
A few months later, just before the law changed, Tottenham midfielder Moussa Sissoko conceded a penalty in the UCL final where the ball hit his outstretched arm off the chest.

Many assumed the new wording on deflections meant the Sissoko handball would not be penalised anymore.
Rossetti made it clear before 2019-20 began that the Sissoko handball remains a penalty even after the change.

"This is a correct decision now and next season. It's a penalty. It doesn't matter if ball touched before the chest and then the arm of the player, it's a penalty."
So, coming back round to the Koch penalty, Michael Oliver's decision clearly falls into Rosetti's description.

Koch's arm was way out from his body, making it much bigger, and it was a block rather than attempt to play the ball. Therefore, the deflection is irrelevant.
It's unlikely this would have been a penalty last season, when the PL operated its own defensive handball interpretation.

But FIFA has told the PL to fall in line and apply defensive handball much more strictly, as in Europe. As I wrote last week, we will see a lot more pens.
Jairo Riedewald's handball penalty was cancelled by the VAR last season after the ball deflected onto his hand from the foot.

Key difference: is Riedewald attempting to play the ball (vs. just blocking it)? That's subjective of course and refs would have differing opinions.
We can see the difference in the claim for a penalty against Jeff Hendrick for Newcastle at West Ham.

The player's arm is down by his side, and not making his body bigger, as per the laws.

NB: It probably is handball by point of contact alone, but it's borderline.
So on point of contact, the very first game brought the first goal allowed that would have been chalked off last season.

Gabriel for Arsenal on Saturday, and Mamadou Sakho for Palace (last season). Will be far fewer disallowed.
Pitchside monitors. Compare the Kyle Walker-Peters red-card review to the Eddie Nketiah red card vs. Leicester last season.

With Nketiah the referee went to the screen and nodded. On Saturday, Jon Moss had obvious dialogue with the VAR. This is how it's changed.
Last season, the VAR could only recommend a change if the referee's description did not fit with the TV replay.

Now, the VAR can simply tell the referee he needs to look again. It *should* make overturns easier, but it does still rely on the VAR identifying the error.
And finally.... The latest exhibit for "Offside is only bad in the Premier League", as Marseille have a goal disallowed at PSG.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dale Johnson

Dale Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DaleJohnsonESPN

Jul 8
UEFA has confirmed the seeding rule for the QF and SF of its competitions, including Champions League, for next season.

We knew draws were to be removed for QF and SF, but not the specifics of how the home team in the second legs would be determined.

Good one for Arsenal fans.
Key theory:

Teams ranked 1-4 guaranteed to be at home in the QF.
Teams ranked 1-2 guaranteed to be at home in the SF.

However, if any of 1-4 are knocked out, seeding is not recalculated. Home advantage is effectively tied to the result of the round of 16, and then QF.
Therefore, even though Arsenal (3rd place) played PSG (15th place) in the semifinals, Arsenal would NOT be seeded at play the second leg at home if the same were to happen next season.

PSG have priority in the SF as they took the right off Liverpool (1st) by knocking them out.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 16
This does not bode well for Crystal Palace.

Drogheda also won the cup but are excluded from the Conference League due to ownership rules.

Sister club Silkeborg stay in because they finished 7th, with Drogheda (9th) removed.
The deadline for separating associated clubs into a blind trust was changed from June 1 to March 1 as of this year.

That's very harsh for a club such as Palace as they would have needed to do this after the FA Cup fourth round, which seems completely unrealistic.
Drogheda qualified for Europe last November, as cup winners.

But Silkeborg didn't qualify for the Conference League until June 1 through a playoff, three months after the blind trust deadline.

NB: no Irish club will replace Drogheda as there's no time to get a licence.
Read 5 tweets
May 28
REVEALED

The six non-English clubs in Pot 1 MUST play TWO Premier League clubs in the Champions League next season.

Real Madrid
Bayern Munich
PSG
Inter Milan
Borussia Dortmund
Barcelona

Impact is on these 6, rather than Prem teams.

HERE'S WHY 👇
espn.com/soccer/story/_…
Last season, Pot 1 teams played eight games in the league phase against English clubs.

They recorded recorded two wins, a draw and five losses.

This season, the 6 must play 12 games to meet the draw constraints caused by 6 Prem teams in the comp + 3 in Pot 1.
Under usual circumstances the composition of the draw pots doesn't matter anymore.

But this year, (for instance) Barcelona and Real Madrid may be forced to play Totttenham or Newcastle as one team from Pot 3 and 4, rather than, say, Slavia Prague or Bodo/Glimt, etc.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 8
That should have been a second yellow for Lucas Bergvall.

It wasn't an attempt to stop a promising attack, which wouldn't result in a caution if the move plays out.

It was a reckless tackle, and should have been a booking regardless of the attack. #TOTLIV
Ange Postecoglu is incorrect for three reasons.

1. Bergvall's offence is a reckless tackle, not stopping a promising attack

2. Advantage isn't applied on a second yellow unless it's an IMMEDIATE goal chance

3. Ref didn't play advantage. Said no foul

Ange is correct that there's no yellow for stopping a promising attack (SPA) if the ref plays advantage and the attack plays out.

But the law doesn't allow Stuart Attwell to play advantage even if he did view Bergvall's challenge as SPA. Play must stop and second yellow shown.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 3, 2024
Club World Cup explainer

🔺 How the 31 teams qualified
🔺 Inter Miami and Messi?
🔺 The old Club World Cup still exists!
🔺 Will it be competitive?
🔺 Player burnout?
🔺 Format
🔺 Match dates
🔺 Draw on Thursday
🔺 Venues
🔺 Trophy

READ 👇
espn.co.uk/football/story…
Club World Cup draw pots now confrimed.

- No group can feature more than one team from the same confederation except UEFA, with 12 teams
- Pot 1 will have paired seedings based on the confederation rankings
- Pot 1 teams go to position 1
- Inter Miami will play the opening match Image
The full match schedule comprising the stadium and kick-off time for each fixture will be finalised and published once the draw has taken place, taking into account a range of factors including sporting and player-centric criteria, local and fans and broadcast considerations.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 30, 2024
Ok, so FIFA has made a small, yet significant change to the protocols for the World Cup qualifying draw.

It could have an impact on each of the home nations, but potentially the greatest effect could be on Wales.

A thread to explain for the home nations. Image
What's changed?

Previously, all Nations League (UNL) quarterfinal (QF) and playoff (PO) teams in Pots 2, 3 and 4 were to be "in priority allocated to groups of four."

This has been removed. These teams now could potentially be in a group of five.

You can see the edit here. Image
Image
So, let's take a look at what this means.

For England, not a huge amount as they could always be in a group of four or five.

However, once England are in a group of four or five, they are, when Pot 2 begins, now able to draw ANY of the teams from Pot 2.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(