Malcolm Clark Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1./ The new look LGBTQ+ movement and child safeguarding. Here we go again. Adrian Harrop berates @VictoriaPeckham for her warning that a small minority of nutjobs in the movement are weak on child safeguarding. Some are positively dangerous. Adrian bleats that this is 'bigotry'.
2./ This is the SAME bloke who had to issue this spectacular apology: "it was not my intention to equate the actions or beliefs of @jk_rowling with those of Jimmy Saville in any way." Two rules. Defend women's rights and you'll be compared to an abuser. 👇
3./ But point out flaws in child safeguarding in our sainted LGBTQ+ movement and you're a bigot. Same effect: both undermine scrutiny. Why is it so difficult for so many "queer" activists even to SEEM to take child safeguarding seriously? Is it because deep down...they just dont?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malcolm Clark

Malcolm Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TwisterFilm

May 3
1./ The Truth about Daniel Radcliffe.
He claims to be sad about the rift between him and JK Rowling over what he describes as trans rights. Truth is he refuses to consider the harm he does by promoting the notion of gender identity. Who is harmed? 👉
1/7
theguardian.com/film/2024/may/…
2./ This straight bloke showcases his self-professed moral superiority by claiming to "support the rights of all LGBTQ people". Actually he is acting -intentionally or not- as a shill for Big Pharma by advocating puberty blockers; drugs NHS England have effectively banned.Image
3./ He is used by the LGBTQ+ group @TrevorProject, a Pharma money-laundering exercise which generates fake research to justify pumping powerful drugs into confused youngsters. It claims to be trying to reduce youth suicidality. It does the opposite.👇
Read 7 tweets
May 1
1./ Here's why I think this article about Kate Forbes is a disgrace. @KennyFarq attacks the likely candidate for First Minister because of her Christian faith. He has the cheek to use gay rights to defend his argument but hypocrisy and misogyny are really driving it.
1 of/ 21 Image
2./ Start with the hypocrisy. Farquarson hones in on the fact Forbes said she would have voted against gay marriage in 2014. He fails to note that Yousaf was strangely absent from the vote. Colleagues claimed this was because of pressure from his mosque.
thescottishsun.co.uk/news/politics/…
3./ We know what Yousaf's mosque thought of the gay marriage vote, because they openly campaigned against it. Here's their spokesman saying marriage is for procreation. Its views were echoed by Muslim campaigners asking, "what would become of our society?"
Read 21 tweets
Apr 17
1./ How did this scandal happen?
How did an 8 year old girl in this clip from @libsoftiktok end up injected with a drug invented to treat prostate cancer in old men? Let me tell you how fake science turned her hospital in Boston into a Ground Zero of this medical disaster.
1/18
2. The girl was treated at the Gender Management Service (GeMS) Clinic at Boston Children's Hospital. The clinic was founded in 2007 by Norman Spack, an endocrinologist, or hormone specialist. He was on a hormone mission ever since witnessing a trial in Holland a few years before Image
3./ In the mid 90s doctors there began giving a small group of teens GnRH agonists or puberty blockers to "pause" puberty. Spack now advocated for this to be embraced globally. He ignored the flaws of the trial, dissected here brilliantly by Michael Biggs.
Read 18 tweets
Apr 16
1./ The SNP, Misogyny and Helena Kennedy
3 years ago I said it was inevitable the SNP would make a hash of their Misogyny Bill and include men (transwomen) in their proposed law. The reason? Helena Kennedy is immersed in trans ideology. The evidence? 👉
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
2./ In a thread then I showed how Kennedy lavished praise in a series of LGBT+ events on Roz Kaveney, Peter Tatchell and other trans rights fanatics such as Naomi Wolf. Kennedy described Wolf as a good friend. How close a friend soon became clear. 👉
3./ At one event Kennedy chaired, Wolf spoke out against single sex spaces, railing against how the Far Right was allegedly engineering a moral panic about them. This was identical, she said, to 'gay panics' in the past. Cue applause from Plonk Noos.👇
thepinknews.com/2020/11/28/nao…
Read 12 tweets
Apr 13
1./ Ruth Hunt is a Bit of a Cult.
You have to hand it to Stonewall's ex-CEO, Ruth Hunt. She really knows how to lie. In her interview she claims Stonewall merely "listened to the experts" and cites one in particular. Why is this a lie?
1/of 15 👉
thetimes.co.uk/article/fe117e…
2./ Hunt names Polly Carmichael from the Tavistock. But for all her faults, Carmichael actually said of prescribing puberty blockers, "it would be disingenuous to say it is fully reversible." Yet Stonewall even today maintains blockers are reversible.
thetimes.co.uk/article/childr…Image
3./ Despite them being banned by NHS England and after a new study from the Mayo Clinic indicates they seriously damage the testicles of boys and may lead to cancer, Stonewall still says blockers are reversible Listened to experts? This is far from Hunt's only lie.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 12
1./ The Biggest Lie About the Cass Report
This video is just one source that claims the trans lobby has long supported the holistic mental health approach that Cass now recommends. This is a lie. Let me tell you the real story of the trans lobby's attitude to mental health.
2./ 25 years ago the trans lobby began a campaign to dilute and remove references to mental health in trans healthcare. A particular target was the Standards of Care of the global trans healthcare organisation WPATH and its predecessor HBIGDA. Why did trans activists do this?
3./ Up to 1998 the Standards of Care included a prominent warning (Principle 1) that sex reassignment "may be requested by persons experiencing short-term delusions or beliefs which may later be changed and reversed." It urged psychiatric oversight. The trans lobby hated that.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(