dikgaj Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1)This was also why whole "Hindu" civil code was formulated: combined with the Muslim League successor Constituent assembly member's claim that Hindus being majority shdnt hv Constitutional protection for their culture/law only "minorities" need it-logic since used by judicially.
2)in ruling after ruling the "Hindu code bill" has stripped off all obligations but affirmed all the rights of the wife given in Hindu traditional jurisprudence. Courts only cite interpretations of Hindu texts that support their ruling but I have never seen full original quotes
3)this extension of marital recognition to same-biological gender unions, should be pursued on its own demerits or merits and come under a special marriage act - but it would a be cynically abusive attack on Hindus by calling it a 'Hindu marriage" under Hindu civil code.
4)No part of Hindu jurisprudence before the free mash under the disaster Nehru - has any support for same bio-gender "marriages". Open minders should be open minded enough not to discriminate by preventing non-Hindus from the benefit of open-minded marriages.
5)Open minders should show also the minimal honesty and respect in not claiming same bio-gender marriages as "Hindu" as there is no traditional textual Hindu jurisprudence support for it - the same respect they show to Islamic and Christian jurists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

Aug 19
1) Nice try. But USA, China, Pakistan form a threesome where India is concerned. Given all three’s record in attempting or managing to destabilise other countries, and all three’s links into Bangladesh, it’s a reasonable projection that they were involved.
2) Interim gov won’t go and can’t go against mullah networks in control of society. The interim gov wont displease an essentially Islamist society that has been consistently and increasingly Islamised under every Bangladeshi regime, via foreign agents, aid, and organisations.
3) anti-Hindu violence has always existed in Bangladesh/E.Pak and is just not a regime induced thing. it has support from underlying Islamist networks who see it as their traditional tool to clear an area of pre-Islamic natives, subjugated into serving jihadis lust and greed.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 11
1) Seemingly rational. But one has to be careful in giving rationale publicly to policies that help exactly what the enemy want. Here’s a long list of things here that range from wishful thinking to the dangerous. First is the line of appealing to reason in Islamic countries.
2) the two primary arguments of appeal to reason to jihadis here is that (a) absence of Hindus among them will lead to intra-Muslim conflict destroying Muslims as a whole. (b) modern technological progress doesn’t come from Quran, and Hindus among them can provide that.
3) this is a futile delusion that refuses the reality that all jihadis think of Hindus as Untermenschen, as prey, and internal conflict among Muslims can go alongside preying on Hindus, and is desirable to refine Muslim society to one pure imagined 7th c desert jiahdotopia.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 14
1) Such clarity does emerge in India too, but can only be expressed from outside India. There is an internal problem in Indian society and state because of its colonial derivative nature that deliberately sides with the jihadi simply out of fear and hatred of the majority.
2) the colonial intervention created a fundamental disruption between the majority common Hindu and the political, military, admin Hindu elite who inherited and adopted the world view of colonial masters that saw the common Hindu as the primary threat to their hold on state.
3) the societal memory of colonial abuse of power, reinforced by the post independence Hindu elite in power means the common Hindu still see their current state as effectively the same as the colonial one with no recourse left for them even through the judicial route.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 14, 2023
1) Was reading up on the British Tasmania civilising mission after a long time. The quintessential British character of hyper-hypocrisy on values, as shown in the scum governor Arthur or his scum solicitor general, was acting out in the same time as lead up to Indian war of 1857.
2) the British civilisers went out hunting native adults, capturing women for rape or sex-slaves, children as slave labour. natives fought back. So great Brit civiliser Arthur sent his men in chains of deniability to civilise natives by doing what they wr doing before on natives.
3) the way British officials carefully edited, omitted references to the infamous axing of a native woman on the beach after shooting her in the back, all the way up frm bottom to Arthur and his SG, shows the scum all the way to the top wr aware of what their sweet boys wr up to.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 8, 2023
1) Israeli intel likely lost out because of their interfaces with those they deem or r forced deem as friends. The Hamastinian raid was planned for long, and too many western and US intel are embedded in Hamastine to not know. They made sure that Israelis were kept in the dark.
2) US, Euro, Egyptian or US linked Arab Intel wd hv collaborated pretending this wd help topple Bibi, and place an Israeli gov more aligned to US pseudo-left. Their handlers wd work with Hamas, and I am pretty sure that western media was embedded within Hamastine raiders.
3) whoever masterminded the plan however either didn’t estimate or deliberately didn’t share with all collaborators how far Hamastine raiders wd go in rape, torture, murder and how much of that will be made public. Also calculation was that Israelis wdnt put it in public domain.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 26, 2023
1) Total bull. It was you who sought to disqualify a reality of Brit civilising claims because of the presumed location of the person protesting it. Location is irrelevant for the question. If an Australian kangaroo was able to say it, it too wdnt be disqualified.
2) there is no country with sizeable popn that is able to stamp out trafficking, including current Britain whose image u sought to whitewash and falsely made equivalence between an arm of the British gov doing/covering for it/lying abt it with Indian army/gov that doesn’t do it.
3) u can revel in serving the British queen/king, or their permanent servant at beck and call. I never did it, so I am not an NRI or RNI of ur kind. U chose British apologist side on “civilizational” question about “Hindus”. I chose the latter, and strictly on historical reality.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(