“ I never thought respecting international law, in my lifetime, would be a matter of disagreement. “
The PM - to his shame - shakes his head and rolls his eyes at him, as though he had said something extraordinary.
Again. Three excellent questions from @Ed_Miliband on violating international law.
1) Is it right? 2) Is it necessary? 3) is it in our national interest?
No. We are known around the world for the rule of law.
Again, so glad to see @Ed_Miliband emphasising that this is not about Remain vs Leave. It’s an argument about right vs wrong.
***
Shocking it should need saying in 21st Century Britain. Tiny glimpses of hope at least to see MPs of all stripes standing up for the rule of law.
This is fantastic from Miliband.
Tory MPs , who supported & campaigned on the deal, *should* be mortified.
On Johnson’s food blockade argument. "This is as ridiculous an argument as I've ever heard, even by his arguments."
He comments on the irony of a critical point.
“This bill does precisely nothing to address issue of transport of food from GB to NI." It’s about 2 issues on international law- (i)exit declarations NI to GB & (ii) state aid in NI.”
Urges Johnson to state what clause protects the threat he says he is worried about, on GB to NI exports.
Johnson sits there in sulky silence.
Miliband responds: he didn’t read the protocol, he hasn’t read the bIll, he doesn’t know his stuff.
Miliband repeats Major/Blair: The Bill puts the GFA at risk because it negates the predictability, political stability & legal clarity integral to the delicate balance between N and S Ireland that is at the core of the peace process.”
Blistering form from Miliband.
“He may not believe them but he will, I hope believe himself because this is what he said:
There are political circs in NI that deserve particular respect & sensitivity, & that is what have received in the deal. It’s a great deal for NI..”
🔥 🔥
Miliband continues:
“This is not just legislative hooliganism on any issue. It is on the most sensitive issues of all."
The PM and Tory MPs who plan to vote with him should feel ashamed by everything Miliband is pointing out.
Miliband shreds the “this was all a bit of a rush” argument.
“What the PM is [telling us today] is that his flagship deal, the deal he told us was a triumph, the deal he said was oven-ready, the deal on which he fought & won the GE, is now contradictory & ambiguous.”
“What incompetence.What failure of governance.How dare he try & blame everyone else.This time,he can't blame [May].He can't blame Major.He can't blame the judges.He can't blame the civil servants.He can't sack the Cabinet secretary again...his deal,his mess,his failure.”
I’ve missed a bit here, inc on International law. But this is Miliband truly demolishing each and every one of the govt’s arguments.
Johnson looks slumped & surly.
“This is a new way of thinking about legal questions. It now turns out that breaking the law specifically & in a limited way is a reasonable defence for this govt.
We’ve all heard of self-defence, the alibi defence, the innocence defence & now the Johnson defence.”
Miliband quotes Priti Patel today on the new Covid rules saying the majority will abide by the law but a small minority won’t.
“You couldn’t make it up. The Johnson defence means something v specific:
One rule for the British public & another rule for this govt.”
Miliband emphasises that reneging on an agreement we made a year ago would make them less likely to trust us.
We need a deal. We know the risks of No Deal. The PM is wrong that this is a good outcome.
“We’re in the biggest economic crisis for 300 years, the biggest public health crisis for 100 years. No deal is not some game. It’s about the livelihood of millions of people across our country.”
Hear hear.
“This is a signal we're sending to our friends & allies around the world. The country known for the rule of law. The country that abides by the law. The country that founded international law...That's why we cannot support this bill and we will oppose it tonight.”
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
“A Prime Minister that is casual not to say cavalier & reckless about the gravity of the issues he confronts...he is cavalier on international law, he is cavalier on our traditions, this is not the serious leadership we need, that’s why we will oppose this Bill tonight.”
🔥🔥🔥
Well. I didn’t mean to live tweet the whole of Miliband’s speech. It was brilliant, what the moment required & the total opposite of the mendacious, nonsensical arguments of the PM. I was transfixed.
But I must get back to my desk. No doubt brilliant @IanDunt is continuing...
A quick general thread about what to expect and understand the ICJ judgment on South Africa's request for provisional measures against Israel, at 12pm UK time today, which you can watch live . A few things to watch out for. /1icj-cij.org/sites/default/…
First, we need to be clear about what the Court is doing today. It is NOT making a definitive finding that there has or has not been genocide. It is being asked by South Africa to make provisional orders, which you could liken to an emergency injunction. /2
The Court will award provisional measures only if it considers that there is a plausible risk of genocide, and that the situatio. urgently requires such measures. SA gave many examples of the Court's own such orders in the past. /3
Two specific allegations: war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) & unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to Russian Federation (Arts 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of Rome Statute).
ICC: reasonable grounds to believe Putin bears individual criminal responsibility (i) for having committed the acts directly, jointly with others &/or through others & (ii) for his failure to exercise control properly over civilian & military subordinates who committed the acts..
.. and who were under his effective authority and control, pursuant to superior responsibility.
In sending that tweet*, & not backing down, @GaryLineker sought to stand up for vulnerable, voiceless people & unwittingly unleashed a roar of support.
Don’t lose that focus on Monday, when the govt puts the shocking, inhumane & unworkable illegal Migration Bill before Plmnt.
*whether you agree with his analogy or not.
A clear & useful @instituteforgov analysis and set of Qs MPs & media should be requiring the government to answer.
It’s wild reading British news headlines from abroad. A govt not talking to crucial sectors on strike, people barely managing a cost of living crisis, Brexit costs unacknowledged, so too climate crisis, but govt wants to whip up fury about small boats & leave ECHR yet again.
These politically unstable years since the referendum have done a lot of damage - with Britain on one hand rightly damning violations of international law by states including Russia and China, but itself making wrecking ball threats which jeopardise & may weaken those same norms.
This “pick and mix” approach to law isn’t just reflected internationally, but also domestically. Tomorrow, as the Lords debate #REULBill, we have another example of a govt playing fast and loose with the frameworks and stability of law. It’s a dangerous game. With consequences.
And just like that, #GlobalBritain becomes the next Brexit catchphrase to bite the dust. This news that the UK formally is to downgrade its longstanding commitment to human rights for close diplomatic ties is a real blow. Soft power has always mattered. theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Hoping for a strong and principled response from opposition parties on the govt’s reported foreign policy intention to drop the UK’s long-standing commitment to human rights for close diplomatic ties.
Pragmatism has always been a bedrock of foreign policy. But my own experience of British diplomacy around the world has been that the values, language & culture of human rights often have been played an important role, even if not always as central as human rights advocates wish.