Johnathan Wood Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Dug into the lineup data to see how Bears used their TEs yesterday. Not going to focus too much on efficiency because it's a lot of small sample sizes, more on what they tried to do.
Bears had 3 TEs on the field for 11 snaps yesterday, and threw it on 7 of those. Looks like they were trying to catch the defense thinking run and exploit that.

They had 10 plays with 2 TEs, and ran it 8 times. That's about what you'd expect for a jumbo package.
They had only 1 TE on the field for the other 44 snaps (mostly Graham with 34 of those). Only ran it on 10 of those snaps, though I don't know how much of that is due to needing to throw in the 4th quarter (data is only available for full game).
My biggest takeaway is how many snaps we saw with 2+ TEs. It was about 1/3 of the snaps yesterday, and I'm guessing closer to 40 or 50% before they went to almost exclusive 1 TE sets while having to air it out during the late comeback.
Bears only had 2+ TEs on the field for 108 snaps last year. They're on pace to hit that in only 5 weeks this year. That's a massive shift in the offensive approach. It puts them more in line with what KC did last year; they had 2+ TEs on the field for ~400 snaps (25/week).
Again, I'm not going to dig into the effectiveness of those different lineups yet, because the sample sizes are too small, which makes them skewed by 1-2 plays (either good or bad). I'll take a closer look at that after maybe a month or so.
To illustrate what I mean by one play skewing the results: the 34 plays with Jimmy Graham as the only TE on the field look like they were pretty inefficient passing, but that's largely because of the 28 yard sack/fumble.
And those Graham as the only TE formations have great running stats, but that's because of the Trubisky scramble + 15 yard penalty (1 of 10 runs in these looks, ~50% of the yards). One play in each that had nothing to do with Graham completely skews the results.
Slight correction here: Bears had 139 snaps with 2+ TEs on the field last year. Still massively lower than that number will be this year.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Johnathan Wood

Johnathan Wood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Johnathan_Wood1

Dec 30, 2022
🧵 Something to keep in mind when talking about the Bears' resources this offseason: they have a TON of needs. Let's start with a look at their current 2023 depth chart, showing every player under contract for 2023 (per Over The Cap).
Positions where I am really not happy with the current starter on that list:
RB (at least need a platoon pass catching guy)
WR (VJJ not a starter)
LG
C
RT
DEx2
NT
3T
LB (Sanborn 1, assuming base nickel)
CB (Vildor not a starter)

That's 11 starters needed, at a minimum.
So yes, the Bears have a really high draft pick, and a lot of money to spend. But it's not like they can allocate those resources to just a few players. Upgrades are needed pretty much everywhere.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
A note on Fields' passing volume: in his last 9 games, Fields is throwing for 175 yards per game. That's not great - would be just under 3000 yards for a 17 game season. He's been efficient when he throws, but doesn't throw it much.
A big reason for the lack of throws is Fields scrambling, often due to combination of poor pass protection + nobody getting open. In the last 9 games, Fields averages 24 passes + 5 scrambles per game. So about 1 in 6 pass plays end with Fields needing to run.
If you factor in the scrambles, Fields has 29 pass plays for 231 yards per game over the last 9 games. That's a bit more reasonable in volume (would be just under 4,000 yards on a full season), and is still insanely efficient (8.2 yards/play).
Read 7 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
Justin Fields was really bad for the first month of the season. 51% completion, 7.0 yds/att, 2 TD/4INT, and only 37 rush yards/gm (4.3 yds/carry).

A switch flipped in MIN game. Now 9 games since: 66% completion, 7.6 yds/att, 13 TD/6 INT, and 95 rush yds/gm (7.8 yds/carry)
For a little more context, NFL average is 65% completion, 7.1 yards/attempt, and 1.9 TD/INT (Fields at 2.2 over last 9 games). So Fields has now been an above-average passer for over 2 months.

Fields' NFL ranks if you look at his last 9 games:
CMP %: 16th
YPA: 7th
Rating: 8th
oh yeah, and Fields is also doing that while rushing for 95 yards/game, a mark that only one player in the NFL can top right now. And while playing behind a bad OL throwing to bad WRs.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27, 2021
THREAD:

One thing I've been thinking about in the wake of Javon Wims' cut yesterday: Chicago's offense should be much less predictable based on personnel.

They've been very obvious in terms of run/pass splits based on who's on the field in the past.
I've been tracking this for years, but here's the writeup for 2020, when the Bears had 4 players who were obvious run/pass tells.

dabearsblog.com/2021/examining…
In 2020, the Bears were:

Far more likely to run with Wims in the game,
Far more likely to pass with any of Graham, Miller, or Cohen in the game.

This was true even within the same personnel groupings (ie 3 WR sets with/without Wims, or Miller, etc.).
Read 7 tweets
Aug 22, 2021
Thread: Whole lot of people using yesterday as an opportunity to say Nagy failed Trubisky, not the other way around. I'm just over here like... no. The Bears' offense has distinct problems that come from both of them.
The Bears have frequent issues with getting the play call in on time, confusion lining up, taking delay of game, wasting timeouts to avoid delay of game, too many pre-snap penalties. That's on Nagy.
Nagy needs to remember the KISS principle: Keep It Simple, Stupid. He tries to outsmart everybody and makes it too complicated in the process. Watch a great playcaller like Kyle Shanahan or Sean McVay, and things look easy for the offense. It never looks easy for the Bears.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 21, 2021
Nagy can say all he wants about playing starters more in the preseason, but their WR1, WR2, TE1, LT, RT, and RG all sat today. Of course Andy Dalton looks like shit. He can't elevate backups.

Bears know this and don't care. They clearly already made up their mind about week 1.
so what actually happened today that mattered? Not a whole lot, honestly.

All of Chicago's CBs fighting for starting roles had terrible days. Bilal Nichols got hurt. That's about it.
As for Fields, he can run well and throws a beautiful deep ball. We knew both of those things already. The stats look ugly, but that's because he's throwing to used car salesmen trying to play in the NFL, and none of them can create separation or catch.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(