Thread: It's college ratings week, and in our business, we know that means USNWR.

I don't blame USNWR: They simply identified something colleges probably should be doing, but were reluctant to, and did it themselves. For profit.
But of course they're silly. @Gladwell Malcolm Gladwell does a good job of tearing them apart in his @NewYorker article, here: newyorker.com/magazine/2011/…
If you don't want to read the whole thing, here's the point that proves the premise: Image
But we sort of pretend the rankings are new. They aren't. The popularity of them is new. The rankings have been around for a while.

Consider: Image
This was written in 1911 by Kendric Charles Babcock, who wanted to look at those universities that sent or might send students to the master's degree. It was a single, easy-to-understand rating criterion. It's available here in different formats archive.org/details/classi…
I don't know about college attainment in 1911, but in 1940, about 3% of adults had a college degree, so master's degree attainment must have been something very special in 1911. See also HS Grads. highereddatastories.com/2019/08/change… Image
The methodology was strictly qualitative. He or his designees traveled to selected institutions to conduct interviews. Six of them were Ivy League (if the Ivy League even existed then I don't care and I don't want to know so don't @ me) Image
Class I. Image
Class II. Image
Class III Image
Class IV Image
Here is the page of the Ms for instance Image
There are others. My favorites are from 1957 in the Chicago Daily Tribune, written by Chesly Manly, whose name is evocative of someone who might know this stuff in 1957. The top school for men? ImageImage
Also rans? Wesleyan, Union, Kenyon, Amherst, and Hamilton. Here is the full article in pdf dropbox.com/s/e5gc7tfdztjx…
Women's rankings: Image
Radcliffe, Pembroke, Goucher, Wellesley, and Vassar were also mentioned. That article is here dropbox.com/s/u33mgicx9led…
Co-ed? ImageImage
Lawrence, Carleton, Swarthmore, also got mentions.

dropbox.com/s/hj11hjsa2x4k…
I include these all as Fair Use, btw.
And here is a picture of our author, Chesly Manly Image
Rankings have been around for a while. And they haven't changed much over time. Read those articles and you'll see why. I think. Enjoy.

And don't get your shorts in a knot about them.
If they like your college, it's OK to mention it. If they don't, it's OK to disparage them.
Oh, and #EMTalk

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Boeckenstedt de la Azure Cheque

Jon Boeckenstedt de la Azure Cheque Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonBoeckenstedt

Feb 7
Thread: It seems I'm spending more time telling people why I'm not too interested in the Dartmouth decision than it would take to just put it here. So here goes. I hope this is the last I'll say about it.
First, I've long said that if a college finds value in the SAT, they would be foolish not to use it. I just ask that they do the research, which Dartmouth did. And the lowest-scoring students at Dartmouth end up with a GPA of 3.1 or something like that. Horrible.
I am--frankly--a little suspicious of analysis that shows the SAT is better than HS GPA, because you know damn well if College Board or ACT could make that claim, they'd have done so long ago. They've never even whispered it.
Read 18 tweets
May 3, 2023
Thread: Post-May 1, aka the death of May 1:

A friend sent this Image
This is the result of the DOJ investigating the NACAC Statement of Principles of Good Practice, which would have allowed this if the student had not withdrawn, but would have forbidden it if the student had notified the offering school that they had deposited elsewhere.
The DOJ treated college just like any other consumer purchase: Suppose car dealers agreed the Subaru dealer could not call you while you were on the way to the Ford dealer to buy the car you had agreed to buy, and offer you a better deal?

That would be bad for consumers.
Read 15 tweets
May 2, 2023
Thread: When someone tells you about the big drop in high school graduates, remember 2014. Because by 2037, we'll be back to numbers like we saw in 2014. Image
What's really compelling is the mix: America will be more diverse, and because different ethnic groups have different college participation rates, that's the big thing going on behind the numbers. Image
And, of course, New England has known this for a long time. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 1, 2023
Thread: The numbers.

I've never received so many emails about my writing in CHE as I have for the most recent one about "The Number."

But here's a little insight into that.
Sunday morning, I logged in and checked our Tuition Deposits for Fall first-year students.

By Sunday evening (12 hours later) that number had gone up by 3.7%.

By this morning, it had gone up another 3.2% over that.
Expressed another way, 6.5% of all deposits we currently have came in during the last 24 hours. And we still have a day to go...the day that is traditionally the biggest, or at least one of the biggest.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 10, 2023
Thread: Don't be shocked when I tell you this. It takes a lot of people some time to figure it out, and sometimes a little longer to sink in:

College Board is a business.
It's a not-for-profit business. But it's a business. Not-for-profit means they don't have owners or stockholders to collect excess revenue as profits.

It's not a charity. That's not what not-for-profit means.
Moreover, it's not a government agency.

No one appointed them. No one voted them in. No legislative bodies brought them into being.

Yet it has an outsized role in determining what students get taught.

It affects millions of kids each year. Did you know that?
Read 13 tweets
Feb 9, 2023
Thread:

Hey, everyone: This is pretty big.

The Daily Caller (ugh) has memos from the Florida DOE suggesting they were influencing @CollegeBoard on the AP African-American Studies curriculum as early as January 2022, and at the very minimum, July 2022.
So, to everyone who somehow believed that College Board made its own, independent decisions about the framework/curriculum and wrapped it all up in December, 2022, before DeSantis went public: Read this.

scribd.com/document/62466…
I normally wouldn't trust Daily Caller, but this serves their right wing agenda well; it's believable, and, I suspect, even they wouldn't publish a fabricated memo from the Florida DOE.

In order to win the nomination in 2024, DeSantis is going to have to do two things Trump did:
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(