So @acloudguru has unveiled its State of Cloud Learning Report.
Let's explore it.
Disclaimer: They have not paid me for this, so I'm already salty.
We start with a methodology. I'm already suspicious. How do we know this wasn't just one person streaming @acloudguru videos continuously since the 1600s?
I agree with the first part; certifications show that someone's at least conversant with the vocabulary.
But conflating certifications with hands-on experience dramatically skews the result.
"Would you prefer someone who built S3 / has a certification?" Those aren't alike.
Are the remaining 3% drunk at work?! Who on earth would disagree with this?
Every single time you read about a talent shortage, fill in the rest of the sentence with "...at a price they want to pay." Upskilling internal folks is cheaper than buying those skills on the open market.
I hope @acloudguru gets off its ass and fills in its rings on the Apple Watch. It's still early, so I have hope.
"Yes, training is important, now go file your expense reports" is a microcosm of the real world situation.
This aligns to market share as well as expertise.
Notably, the other providers all have pages "so you're coming from @awscloud to our platform, here's the translation guide."
AWS very much does not have such a webpage.
Demand for Azure certification beats out AWS? Not entirely surprising--JEDI is going to have one hell of a halo effect.
If I were picking a platform to learn and were amenable to the DC area? I'd be tempted.
I wonder what happened in May for Azure?
Note that all of these are skyrocketing. Here's what people care about today.
Concur. Degrees definitely have value--but if you're looking to invest 4 years and 100K to improve your career prospects, there are definitely alternate / better paths for that investment.
The word "Partner" appears nowhere on this sheet, but that's the real reason companies care about certifications. You need to have X certified people to qualify for Y partner tier.
Let me clarify that:
Your certification has value to your employer. Charge more.
"I'm completely f*cking flummoxed" said @acloudguru president Katie Bullard. "Since when does management have a plan for ANYTHING?! I don't quite know what to make of this. Maybe the survey system broke?"
This concludes the report. It kinda peters out towards the end without a rousing call to action, or a suggestion to call @acloudguru for your training needs.
That's a mistake. We give ACG subscriptions to all of our staff who want one. They're solid.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's cloud marketing story is called "The Tale of Hot Rebecca," and is a truthful recounting of dinner last night.
Strap in; it's a fun ride.
Back in my early 20s, I had a number of friends / acquaintances in my (primarily Jewish) social circle named "Rebecca." It was kind of a problem.
("Can't we spray for them?"
"…not since the 1940s.")
So every Rebecca got an adjective, much like the seven dwarves. One of them asked me once what her adjective was, and I responded in a fit of unadulterated honesty, "you're Hot Rebecca" because honestly? Damn.
Made it to the #GoogleCloudNext keynote seating finally. Let's see how this goes now that the world is starting to wake up to a "much of the AI hype is unwarranted" reality.
Boeing: "HOW ARE THEY DOING IT?!"
Airbus: "We bought a torque wrench?"
Boeing: "No, how are you being a featured customer testimonial at #GoogleCloudNext?"
Airbus: "Oh, that? We made a strategic decision to not be walking poster children for corporate negligence."
And now, some DevOps / SRE / Sysadmin / Ops / ENOUGH already tips I learned from early in my career--brought to us by our friends at Chex™ Mix. All of these are great ideas that you should implement immediately...
DNS is notoriously unreliable, so use configuration management to sync all of the servers' /etc/hosts files. Boom, no more single point of failure.
Future-proofing is an early optimization, so don't do it. Every network should be a /24 because that's how developers think. I mean come on, what are the odds you'll ever have more than 253 hosts in a network?
And the Amazon earnings are out for Q4. A miss on @awscloud revenue by $20 million because analysts didn't expect one of you to turn off a single Managed NAT Gateway.
Let's explore deeper into their press release.
For 2023, AWS sold $90.8 billion of services, most of which were oversized EC2 instances because you all refuse to believe Compute Optimizer when it tells you there are savings to be had if you're just a smidgen more reasonable.
Word frequency in the earnings release:
Customer: 87
Employee: 11
Generative: 16
Cloud: 24
Serverless: 3
DynamoDB: 2
Union: 0
It's once again the most wonderful time of the year: the newly-renamed @Gartner_inc Magic Quadrant for Strategic Cloud Platform Services!
This year there are no visionaries or challengers, just "cloud" vs. "you pretend to be a cloud." Let's explore together!
We're going to ignore the "niche players" because for three of them I don't speak Mandarin, and for @IBMcloud I don't speak ancient Greek.
That leaves @awscloud, @Azure, @googlecloud, and @OracleCloud.
@IBMcloud @awscloud @Azure @googlecloud @OracleCloud First up is AWS due to its undisputed alphabetical supremacy.
Strengths include its "everything but the kitchen sink" approach, its innovation in hardware design, and its large feeding ground--I mean, partner ecosystem.
Amazon Q / "an AWS spokesmodel" is easily proving incredibly, incredibly helpful at answering the @awscloud questions its human predecessors in corporate comms refused to address.
According to an AWS spokesmodel, EC2, S3, and DynamoDB have all seen price increases. I did not know that!
I was missing a handful of these on my deprecation list; thanks, AWS spokesmodel! You're incredibly helpful!