There has never been more confusion about the role of children in transmission of #SARSCoV2 , and tensions are running high over implications for #schoolsreopening
When considering transmission risk we must consider 2 classes of factors;
Non-modifiable: The biology of the host and pathogen
Modifiable: Behavioural or environmental influence
Since we can change the latter via policy/guidance etc, we'll focus on the former
2/13
How easily to children catch the virus?
Household contact tracing studies suggest less easily than adults; by about half given the same exposure, based on 4 reviews of all the evidence (links in next tweet)
There are some suggestions for biases to explain these findings why this might be the case
Some of these are not correct (e.g. "irrelevant because schools closed" or "cases missed because not symptomatic") and none explain the effect size
5/13
Whilst seroprevalence can't tell us about susceptibility (some effects will be due to exposure), most representative studies have found lower rates of seropositivity in children which would support these findings
The findings are more pronounced in young children (<10y)
We have some indirect evidence from studies of viral loads, suggesting they are broadly similar in children, including those asymptomatic
But we want to know what happens in real life
8/13
2 studies on the same data from South Korea (one adjusting for shared exposure, the other not) seemed to suggest a very low attack rate from infected children, in the setting of extreme infection prevention measures
A further study from Trento, Italy, seemed to suggest children might be more contagious than adults, but this study has some important biases (covered below)
Well there's some evidence infectiousness is correlated with symptoms, and as ~50% of children may be asymptomatic, this might reduce their contribution to transmission
Conclusions
-Children about half as susceptible
-Have roughly same amount of virus
-May be less infectious, ?due to less symptoms
-Lots to learn once schools open
Here is a totally uncontroversial thread about immunity to common pathogens as influenced by the pandemic
I will simply state facts
1. Rates of many commonly circulating pathogens almost completely vanished during the first 1 - 2y of the pandemic (eg Group A Strep)
1/
2. The reason these pathogens almost vanished was because transmission was reduced by the measures which were introduced around the world to reduce transmission of #SARSCoV2
This coincidently also reduced transmission of other pathogens, often even more successfully
2/
3. Because these pathogens commonly circulate, there is usually a relatively stable amount of population immunity to them, acquired by infection
4. Vastly reduced rates of infection will therefore result in lower levels of population immunity than prior to the pandemic
3/