John Cook Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Facebook claims to address their climate misinformation problem by releasing an information center, while doing nothing about climate misinformation being spread on their platform. This is like feeding a person poison while handing them a brochure about fresh vegetables. 1/9
Facebook are trying to greenwash their misinformation problem. Their platform is polluting the information landscape with climate misinformation & at the same time, they’re trying to distract us from their unwillingess to deal with the problem. 2/9
Their information center will likely have negligible impact for several reasons. First, misinformation is more viral than facts. Not being bound by reality, misinformation can be more emotive, shocking, extreme, & hence more likely to be shared. 3/9
Second, misinformation can cancel out accurate information. When people are exposed to fact & myth but don’t know how to resolve the conflict between the 2, they can disengage & not believe either. Misinformation wins in that outcome (more on this at ). 4/9
Facebook's approach to climate misinformation has been a sin of omission at best, an egregious sin of commission at worst. Their more proactive response to COVID misinformation shows they're not constrained by a technical limitation but by a lack of will. 5/9
At worst, they've actively reversed fact-checking efforts by climate experts, enabling climate denial organizations to continue to publish their misinformation. It’s not just dragging their feet. They’ve gone out of their way to facilitate spreading of misinformation. 6/9
To adequately deal with the problem of climate misinformation, Facebook should proactively stop disinformation spreading on their platform. They should also do more than passively post climate info, they should help users understand how facts get distorted by misinformation. 7/9
Supplying facts is necessary but insufficient in our fight against misinformation. If facts are vulnerable when people can’t resolve the conflict between fact & myth, then adequate solutions must also help people resolve that conflict (full video at ) 8/9
We neutralize misinformation by explaining the fallacies & rhetorical techniques in misinformation. We do need tech solutions but ultimately building public resilience & critical thinking is our last & most important line of defence against misinformation 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Cook

John Cook Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johnfocook

Nov 16, 2021
We’ve just published new research in @SciReports - @TravisCoan1, @cboussalis, Mirjam Nanko & myself trained a machine learning model to automatically detect climate misinformation. Full paper is open-access at nature.com/articles/s4159…
In order to train a machine to detect climate misinformation, we first had to build a comprehensive taxonomy of all the different categories of climate myths with 5 main categories (it's not real, it's not us, it's not bad, solutions won't work, climate movement is unreliable).
Next we worked with the @skepticscience team to map tens of thousands of examples of climate misinformation to different claims in the taxonomy - training the machine to detectdifferent misinformation claims. Our biggest content-analysis since the Consensus Project.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 16, 2021
As part of @IOPenvironment's 15-year anniversary, I'm giving a talk today at 2pm GMT (1am in Melbourne FYI) about our 2013 study finding 97% scientific consensus on human-caused global warming. You can register for free at ioppublishing.org/er-2021/
I'll talk about how due to mostly lucky timing, our study got a lot of attention, highlighted by Presidents, Prime Ministers, TV personalities, etc. As a consequence, the paper has been downloaded over 1.3 million times - not bad for a scientific study iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
However one law of communication is with great impact comes equal & opposite pushback. Over the years, we've tracked 500+ articles attacking our 97% consensus study. Here is a flavour of just some of the headlines of articles attacking our research (or attacking us personally).
Read 6 tweets
Dec 16, 2020
A useful new resource on climate science denial was just published in the #Research Handbook on Communicating #ClimateChange elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/97… 1/7
I was invited to edit the section on climate science denial by @DrDavidCHolmes & #LucyRichardson - thx to contributions from leading researchers, we put together a concise & comprehensive 3-chapter resource 2/7
1st chapter is “Sources and amplifiers of climate change denial” by @redunlap1 & @RBrulle - providing a sweeping overview of the various organizations producing climate misinformation over the years. elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/97… 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Dec 11, 2020
It’s challenging debunking misinformation in polarized issues like climate change or COVID. The @crankyuncles game tackles this problem with a critical thinking approach known as logic-based inoculation. crankyuncle.com/game 1/12
We inoculate people against misinformation by exposing them to a weakened form of misinformation. In other words, warn of the threat of being misled & explain the techniques used to mislead. I researched this approach in sks.to/inoculation 2/12
I found that climate misinformation was most effective on political conservatives (orange line). But inoculating people by explaining the denial technique neutralized the misinformation across the political spectrum (blue line). 3/12
Read 12 tweets
Dec 10, 2020
Here’s a short but sweet supercut of bloopers by @Reasondisabled in the original Critical Thinking Cafe video.
This moment has become so iconic that the Ellertonesque “we’re done” has become a personal catchphrase for my wife & I, applicable in many everyday situations. Definitely worth an animated GIF!
The 1st Critical Thinking Cafe video by @Reasondisabled, @davekinkead & myself, was actually a video abstract for our @IOPenvironment paper on using critical thinking to deconstruct climate misinformation. Full video @ , full paper @ sks.to/criticalclimate
Read 4 tweets
Dec 7, 2020
Logic-based inoculation - explaining the rhetorical techniques used to mislead - is like a universal vaccine against misinformation. This is the approach used in the upcoming @crankyuncles game (coming Dec 15) crankyuncle.com/game 1/10
There are two main ways to inoculate people against misinformation: fact-based & logic-based. Fact-based corrections show how a myth is wrong by explaining facts. Logic-based corrections explain the technique or fallacy used by the myth. 2/10
When @PhilippMSchmid & @CorneliaBetsch tested both methods (calling them topic & technique rebuttals), they found both were effective edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php… 3/10
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(