Facebook claims to address their climate misinformation problem by releasing an information center, while doing nothing about climate misinformation being spread on their platform. This is like feeding a person poison while handing them a brochure about fresh vegetables. 1/9
Facebook are trying to greenwash their misinformation problem. Their platform is polluting the information landscape with climate misinformation & at the same time, they’re trying to distract us from their unwillingess to deal with the problem. 2/9
Their information center will likely have negligible impact for several reasons. First, misinformation is more viral than facts. Not being bound by reality, misinformation can be more emotive, shocking, extreme, & hence more likely to be shared. 3/9
Second, misinformation can cancel out accurate information. When people are exposed to fact & myth but don’t know how to resolve the conflict between the 2, they can disengage & not believe either. Misinformation wins in that outcome (more on this at ). 4/9
Facebook's approach to climate misinformation has been a sin of omission at best, an egregious sin of commission at worst. Their more proactive response to COVID misinformation shows they're not constrained by a technical limitation but by a lack of will. 5/9
At worst, they've actively reversed fact-checking efforts by climate experts, enabling climate denial organizations to continue to publish their misinformation. It’s not just dragging their feet. They’ve gone out of their way to facilitate spreading of misinformation. 6/9
To adequately deal with the problem of climate misinformation, Facebook should proactively stop disinformation spreading on their platform. They should also do more than passively post climate info, they should help users understand how facts get distorted by misinformation. 7/9
Supplying facts is necessary but insufficient in our fight against misinformation. If facts are vulnerable when people can’t resolve the conflict between fact & myth, then adequate solutions must also help people resolve that conflict (full video at ) 8/9
We neutralize misinformation by explaining the fallacies & rhetorical techniques in misinformation. We do need tech solutions but ultimately building public resilience & critical thinking is our last & most important line of defence against misinformation 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just published a paper in @CommsEarth where we use the CARDS machine learning model to detect climate misinformation in 5 million climate tweets, finding over half of misinformation tweets involve personal attacks @MarkAndrejevic @liyuanfang @TravisCoan1 nature.com/articles/s4324…
We used the taxonomy from our 2021 paper where we developed the CARDS model for detecting misinformation claims. There are 5 categories of misinformation: it's not real, it's not us, it's not bad, solutions won't work, experts aren't reliable nature.com/articles/s4159…
We found spikes in climate misinformation coincided with external events - usually political events like climate legislation going through Congress or a COP summit, but also extreme weather events like Hurricane Ian
In order to train a machine to detect climate misinformation, we first had to build a comprehensive taxonomy of all the different categories of climate myths with 5 main categories (it's not real, it's not us, it's not bad, solutions won't work, climate movement is unreliable).
Next we worked with the @skepticscience team to map tens of thousands of examples of climate misinformation to different claims in the taxonomy - training the machine to detectdifferent misinformation claims. Our biggest content-analysis since the Consensus Project.
As part of @IOPenvironment's 15-year anniversary, I'm giving a talk today at 2pm GMT (1am in Melbourne FYI) about our 2013 study finding 97% scientific consensus on human-caused global warming. You can register for free at ioppublishing.org/er-2021/
I'll talk about how due to mostly lucky timing, our study got a lot of attention, highlighted by Presidents, Prime Ministers, TV personalities, etc. As a consequence, the paper has been downloaded over 1.3 million times - not bad for a scientific study iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
However one law of communication is with great impact comes equal & opposite pushback. Over the years, we've tracked 500+ articles attacking our 97% consensus study. Here is a flavour of just some of the headlines of articles attacking our research (or attacking us personally).
I was invited to edit the section on climate science denial by @DrDavidCHolmes & #LucyRichardson - thx to contributions from leading researchers, we put together a concise & comprehensive 3-chapter resource 2/7
1st chapter is “Sources and amplifiers of climate change denial” by @redunlap1 & @RBrulle - providing a sweeping overview of the various organizations producing climate misinformation over the years. elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/97… 3/7
It’s challenging debunking misinformation in polarized issues like climate change or COVID. The @crankyuncles game tackles this problem with a critical thinking approach known as logic-based inoculation. crankyuncle.com/game 1/12
We inoculate people against misinformation by exposing them to a weakened form of misinformation. In other words, warn of the threat of being misled & explain the techniques used to mislead. I researched this approach in sks.to/inoculation 2/12
I found that climate misinformation was most effective on political conservatives (orange line). But inoculating people by explaining the denial technique neutralized the misinformation across the political spectrum (blue line). 3/12
Here’s a short but sweet supercut of bloopers by @Reasondisabled in the original Critical Thinking Cafe video.
This moment has become so iconic that the Ellertonesque “we’re done” has become a personal catchphrase for my wife & I, applicable in many everyday situations. Definitely worth an animated GIF!
The 1st Critical Thinking Cafe video by @Reasondisabled, @davekinkead & myself, was actually a video abstract for our @IOPenvironment paper on using critical thinking to deconstruct climate misinformation. Full video @ , full paper @ sks.to/criticalclimate