The ‘social laboratory’ of the internet is widely acknowledged. GIDS itself sponsored a D.Psych thesis by Xinyi Lee, on “transgender youths’ experiences of using social media”, based on 11 patient interviews. Download it here:
As Dr Lee wrote, “parents & clinicians [should be] working together in ensuring that social media use does not pose a risk… it is important for parents to be equally aware of the nature of social media platforms and the potential benefits & risks posed”
>>
In a section called “I found out how to be trans on YouTube” Dr Lee says YouTubers are seen by these GIDS teens as “an authority figure on how to be trans”. One “ascribe[d] more significance to a single person expressing their experience online than …more objective sources.”
>>
“For many of the participants, their first encounter with the word transgender was through online social media. .. It is therefore useful for clinicians … to have a discussion around what constitutes their awareness of trans matters and to distinguish facts from opinions.”
>>
Important to ask “questions about these young trans ppl’s relationship with social media, remaining mindful about whether opportunities online for more troubling kinds of interactions & information have influenced their perceptions… & have a discussion on the risks posed”.
>>
Social media is a powerful way for marginalised communities to gain a voice. As Dr Lee’s research suggests, there are also risks for vulnerable teens working out their identities and life problems. As much as our children are the first ‘digital natives’,
>>
we are the 1st generation of parents raising children with unfettered daily access to such a vast ungoverned resource. Children can connect with complete strangers & encounter extreme views, or unrealistic or troubling ideas about themselves.
>>
Sadly publishers, govt and policymakers seem uninterested in grappling with the harm that’s being done; indeed, it’s often framed as progress.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We're glad Sonia Appleby got justice from @TaviAndPort. Genuine concerns about GIDS were dismissed as transphobia - an accusation @PaulJThinks has levelled at us too recently. We publish our correspondence with him below, in the public interest. 1/
Last yr Dr Heather Wood of GIDS told 3000 UK psychologists that we were "not an appropriate resource" for parents & our website was "blatantly transphobic". Her problem stemmed from our link to @Transgendertrd, a site many parents find helpful and informative.
2/
We're parents devoted to our kids in tough times. Our doubts about the efficacy of life-long experimental drugs are reasonable. We're proud NHS users. As we told the BMJ, the NHS should work with us, not point judgmental fingers as Dr Wood did. 3/ doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2…
Recently, @BBCNewsnight reported on a 2005-6 review of @TaviAndPort ’s Gender Identity Development Service (then known as GIDU), by Dr David Taylor. We have obtained the report via FOI and are publishing it below.
Taylor’s report was prompted by staff disquiet at GIDS, which has continued ever since. @sueevansprotect was the whistleblower then, and has continued her work to safeguard children at GIDS most recently by launching a judicial review with Mum A and @keira crowdjustice.com/case/protect-c…
The report’s concerns are ominously familiar to those raised by staff more recently. As The Times reported in April 2019, many more staff have turned whistleblower in the years since.