Drew Holden Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 27 tweets 21 min read Read on X
🧵Thread🧵

With peace breaking out across the Middle East, I figured it would be a good time to revisit all of the people who told us confidently that @realDonaldTrump was leading us to disaster.

I think some apologies are in order. What say you, @SamanthaJPower? ImageImage
You see, there were many, many Democratic politicians who assured us the world would be ending before our eyes, and that it would be @realDonaldTrump’s fault.

That includes presidential nominee @JoeBiden and his functional head of policy, @ewarren. Image
They weren’t alone. I wonder if we’ll be getting any follow up to this one from @SenSchumer? Image
Or perhaps @BernieSanders would like to follow up on this? ImageImage
Maybe we can get some sort of comment from @repmarkpocan? ImageImage
Their friends across the pond didn’t fair much better. You all surely remember @jeremycorbyn? ImageImage
And, well, yeah. @khamenei_ir, not so much on this one. Credit for @Reuters for getting his perspective though.

They also managed to hear what Hezbollah had to say about American foreign policy. ImageImage
The rest of the media wasn’t far behind. My two favorite come from the alchemic field of “media analysis” at @CNN.

Also, heaven forbid that third frame should happen! ImageImageImageImage
@NewYorker really went in on this one. ImageImage
Tough couple of weeks for @TheAtlantic. Image
I’ll pause here to note that I did a whole separate thread specific to the Jerusalem embassy move.

Many of the same voices (go figure) but also a special shout out to @JohnKerry.
Anyway, back to the media. Here we’ve got @AP. Image
The condescending smart people magazines got in on the mix too.

Here’s @ForeignPolicy and @EconUS. ImageImage
@guardian went in really hard on this one. ImageImage
So too did...@VanityFair?

Yeah, I’m as confused as you are. Image
Running low on patience, space, and mental well-being, so to close out the media - and get to the REAL stars of the show - we have:

@lawfareblog (?)
@business
@NBCNews
@SkyNews (wtf?) ImageImageImageImage
But the real winners here are the bluechecks. Perhaps no one has been as consistently wrong as our cadre of Middle East “experts” in recent memory.

Here’s an illustrative example from @aarondmiller2. Image
You had to know that Obama’s favorite MFA @brhodes was gonna have some bad takes on this one.

He didn’t disappoint. ImageImageImageImage
And speaking of Obama bros with bad opinions, here’s @TVietor08 with a commendable four-box entry of his own. ImageImageImageImage
Speaking of four box entries, here’s your obligatory @SethAbramson mention. ImageImageImageImage
Just VINTAGE @JRubinBlogger here. ImageImage
“Doomed” was apparently the world of the day on this one. In retrospect, that isn’t exactly looking spot on.

Here we have:
@CNASdc
@ilangoldenberg
@nahaltoosi
@rulajebreal ImageImage
Oh and pity the think tanks, they’ve had a tough go on this one. Here are @amprog, @BrookingsInst, and @IPS_DC. ImageImageImage
You couldn’t have thought that @MaxBoot, who’s never seen a Middle Eastern war he isn’t interested in, wouldn’t find a way onto this list.

But did you expect the entire @washingtonpost editorial board to make it? Oh, you did? ImageImageImage
I’ve said it before and I’m sure I’ll have to say it again. All of these people have gotten an enormous number of calls & predictions wrong, time and again, for generations.

Maybe it’s time we stopped to think about what that should mean for our trust in their future ideas?
Anyway, I don’t have anything to sell/subscribe to, but I do these threads often, so throw me a follow.

On the topic of the ME, please don’t forget that Christian persecution remains prevalent. Lots of good orgs are helping & need support, including: christiansatrisk.org/en/donate.html
Just dropping back by to remind you that no class of “experts” has shown themselves more bereft of expertise than those who handle foreign policy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Apr 29
🧵Thread🧵

Many in the media are trying to claim that the press was merely duped by Biden’s White House about the former president’s cognitive decline.

That simply isn’t true. The media actively took part in the coverup.

Don’t let them forget. I’ve got screenshots. ⤵️
I’ve done a number of threads on this but putting some of the most egregious stuff in one place.

Perhaps the most damming: Two weeks before the debate made Biden’s cognitive decline inescapable, @washingtonpost gave “Four Pinocchio’s” to allegedly edited videos showing Biden clearly displaying cognitive problems, dismissing them as “pernicious” efforts “to reinforce an existing stereotype” while quoting the White House to say the videos were “cheap fakes” — all to defend Biden against criticisms about his age and well-being.Image
Image
Image
Image
That story came four days after a previous effort from @washingtonpost to write off these videos as Republican efforts to mislead voters: proof, the Post claimed, that “the politics of misinformation and conspiracy theories do not stop at the waters edge.” Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Apr 15
🧵Thread🧵

I’m not sure people realize just how egregious some of NPR’s “journalism” has been. Amid the debate about defunding the network, I wanted to walk down memory lane to revisit some of its worst coverage.

There’s a lot. ⤵️
First, perhaps the most egregious display of activist journalism: their response to the Hunter Biden laptop story of corruption involving a major party candidate on the eve of the election.

Not only did @NPR not cover it, they bragged about refusing to do so. Image
Insofar as @NPR did cover the Hunter Biden scandal, they actively tried to cover it up.

They applauded Facebook & Twitter strangling the story as part of a push against “misinformation and conspiracy theories.”

The story, of course, turned out to be far from invented. Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(