Roll up! Roll up! Let's see @benjamincohen try to defend Pink News' appalling coverage of @JKRowling's new book. But what headline is he describing here to @NickCohen4.👇It turns out PN changed their headline after they came a cropper; yet again.
2./ At first this was their headline and it slammed the book for suggesting a "cis man who dresses as a woman" might murder women. Did you spot the rather elementary error in their ringing denunciation? Don't over think it.👇
3./ Even they soon realised if you're going to accuse someone of transphobia the fact you've just described their 'evil' character as 'cis' is in danger of undermining your accusation. Cue a quick reshuffle to this headline in which the culprit is now a man who cross dresses.👇
4./ Mmm. It's true in the new trans gospel according to @stonewalluk cross dressers ARE trans but @EHRCScotland advice is you have to be a "serious" crossdresser; living the life. No trans points for men who cross dress for stag parties. Or presumably for the odd bit of murder?
5./ Forget that many transsexuals hate that cross dressers are now put on an equal footing with them. Is Pink News now arguing that by definition guys who throw on a bit of women's clothing when they murder are channeling an inner gender identity?
6./ If this confusion is beginning to sound eerily familar that's because Pink News are so ignorant about their own favourite subject of trans rights they recently accused @jk_rowling of factual inaccuracy about this very issue of who can be trans. And lost.
7./ When she pointed out a bloke who says he's a woman can get a gender recognition certificate without any surgery or hormones they railed against her. They said she was making things up. She wasn't. They were.👇
8./ @FactCheck concluded the writer was right and these champions of gender identity didn't have a clue what they were talking about. It IS possible for a bloke to get a certificate without the slightest physical change from his previously 'cis' body. channel4.com/news/factcheck…
9./ So what's their beef now? If the character in JK's book merely puts on a dress, or according to @NickCohen4 a coat, to commit murder, how is he trans? Doesn't he have to self-identify first? Truth is Pink News are so blinded by hate they can't think straight, pardon the pun.
10./ Even idiots can be useful tho. Their shrill accusations have helped shine a light on the absurdity of the new 'trans umbrella'. Pink News, it seems, has now decided this category is so porous a fictional murderer gets lumped in there just by dint of donning a woman's coat.
11./ They've spent 5 years campaigning for GR Reform but don't get the basics and now it's not JK who's conflating transwomen with a kinky bloke who's a deadly offender. They are. Yes, Pink News has revealed a dark streak of transphobia: their own.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵My latest article celebrates the political wisdom of Ann Widdecombe. Tributes have tended to focus on her defence of free speech, loyalty to friends and great good humour. Yet when it came to the likes of the Gender Recognition Act her views were also uncannily prescient.
2./ During the debate in 2004 Widdecombe described the GRA as a legal quagmire and slammed legislators for failing to "examine the impact on others and on society". How much confusion and sacrifice of women's safety could have been avoided had we heeded her warnings.
3./ Widdecombe ridiculed the idea someone might get a new birth certificate with their false sex. “It is nonsense to try to throw a veil of secrecy...over the past, suggesting ...one can rewrite it or wipe it out,” she told the GRA's hapless proposer David Lammy. Yes him again!
1./ 🧵@PeterTatchell's awful comments on Ann Widdecombe's death have shocked many in the mainstream media. Why though do they turn a blind eye to something just as shocking: his career-long defence of child sexual abuse? Let me tell you why Tatchell should be a pariah. 👉
1/of 19
2./ Is there anyone else in public life who has openly defended men raping boys as Tatchell did in a letter to the Guardian in 1997? It ended with this clarion call: "it is time society acknowledged that not all sex with children is unwanted, abusive and harmful." Nah mate.
3./ In his letter Tatchell cited the views of Gilbert Herdt, an anthropologist who studied tribes in Papua New Guinea. Tatchell failed to acknowledge Herdt had also offered advice to paedophile activists in a pro-paedo magazine on how to normalise their abusive sexual perversion.
1./ 🧵How much did Nicola Sturgeon know about her husband's embezzlement? She claims Peter Murrell's crimes were beyond her wildest imagination. Yet the plot of a book he bought her for Valentine's Day has some startling similarities to the scandal that brought her down. 👉
2./ In my latest article I contrast Sturgeon's portrayal of herself as some sort of innocent abroad to the reality. She has had a lifelong fascination with crime dating back to her childhood obsession with the TV series 'Crown Court'. What an episode her trial would make!
3./ Sturgeon insists she could never have suspected Murrell's crimes yet she is a self-professed "massive fan of crime fiction" who is so knowledgeable about the genre she regularly speaks at crime writing festivals. In 2016 her husband Peter gave her a crime novel she adored. 👉
1./ 🧵Neil Mackay -the Glasgow journalist time forgot- has a new antisemitic conspiracy that's getting him semi-hard. An Israeli firm targetted Scottish elections ...apparently. Mackay who hasn't had an original idea since 1998 is excited. Problem is...👉 heraldscotland.com/politics/viewp…
2./ Forget the idiocy of imagining anyone more than 200 miles from Carnoustie cares what John Swinney does. What is it Mackay suspects Israeli interference wanted to achieve? Ruin Holyrood by ensuring lunatics got elected? This isn't Mackay's first antisemitic rodeo.👉
3./ Who can forget the thoroughly bonkers conspiracy theory about 9/11 Mackay chose to amplify in 2003? It claimed Mossad knew about the plot to hit the Twin Towers yet failed to alert the Americans. The “evidence” this gasbag relied on? Wait till you hear what it was. 👉
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉