Lim Wei Jiet Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Consti Trivia for 🇲🇾 Day:

Did u know that, in 1963, Kelantan challenged the formation of the Federation of Malaysia (i.e. Malaya's decision to federate with Spore, Sabah & Sarawak)?

The "Kelantan challenge" resulted in a Federal Court decision [1963] MLJ 333.

Why did it do so?
The legal reason: the Malaysia Agreement abolishes the Federation of Malaya (which Kelantan is a part of) & thus violate the Fed of Msia Agreement 1957.

Therefore, the Executive had had to obtain the consent of each of Fed of Malaya states beforehand, including Kelantan Ruler.
The Fed Court rejected Kelantan's challenge.

It held that Parliament was within its powers to amend the Constitution to efectuate the Malaysia Agreement, & there was no need to consult the States.

Thus, the Malaysia Agreement was validly signed by the Federal Government.
Chief Justice Thomson delivered the decision only 30 hours before Malaysia was to be declared.

He aptly put it as such: "Never, I think, has a judge had to pronounce on an issue of such magnitude on so little notice and with so little time for consideration."
The political reason?

This article suggests that PMIP (later PAS) - under Dr Burhanuddin Al-Helmy - which controlled Kelantan, preferred instead a merger of Malaya, Indonesia and the Philippines, to form Melayu Raya.

freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opini…
The rest is history.

Singapore later split. Sabah & Sarawak were the founding States of Malaysia & we have been together ever since 1963.

But Sabah/Sarawak have also not been treated as equal partners.

It remains to be seen if federalism in the true sense will come to fruition
Typo correction: it was the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948. Not 1957.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lim Wei Jiet

Lim Wei Jiet Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lim_weijiet

Jul 3, 2023
Dr M says "mempromosi negara berbilang bangsa" is "bertentangan Perlembagaan".

As a lawyer, it is my duty to point out that Dr M has got it absolutely wrong, and has given a shockingly twisted interpretation of our Constitution.
1. At the outset, if one follows the Reid Commission report & the events leading to drafting of Consti (spearheaded by the multiracial Alliance Party), one would know the Consti was DESIGNED to cater to a multiracial country.
2. There were long discussions & finally a delicate balance was struck on citizenship (for non-Bumis) & affirmative action (for bumis). That itself shows how carefully our founders took into account the multiracial reality of Msia.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 5, 2022
If Zahid becomes PM, dismantling our institutions like the Judiciary, AG, MACC, media & rule of law is a given.

But the 1 thing tat keeps me up at night is not the above.

It is the re-drawing of boundaries, which can be done in 2026.

Let me tell you why.
In 2018, UMNO-controlled EC re-drew boundaries to maximise UMNO's advantage.

How?

1) Pack all Opposition voters into super-constituencies to dilute their vote (Malapportionment)

2) Draw boundaries in the most absurd way to make sure UMNO voters get majority (Gerrymandering)
We represented the Sgor State Gov to file a court action on this - Sgor was worst affected.

Malapportionment - 6 super-constituencies created.

malaymail.com/news/what-you-…
Read 11 tweets
Aug 17, 2022
Saya dah baca kesemua 106 mukasurat Laporan JKSTUPKK berkenaan Skandal LCS.

Ada banyak keputusan oleh MOF (diketuai Najib) & MINDEF (diketuai Zahid Hamidi) ketika itu yang meragukan & perlu dijawab segera.

Ini beberapa rumusan penting laporan tersebut: Image
1. MINDEF langgar kehendak TLDM byk kali:

(a) TLDM mahu design kapal Sigma (Belanda), MINDEF luluskan Gowind (DCNS)

(b) TLDM mahu sistem peluru NSM (KDA), MINDEF luluskan MBDA (DCNS)

(c) 4 peralatan diangkat MINDEF ke MOF tanpa dirujuk TLDM, MOF luluskan keesokan hari! ImageImageImageImage
2. Anda perasan nama DCNS dibangkitkan banyak kali?

Amat meragukan. JKSTUPKK dapati BNS bersungguh2 mahu Gowind (DCNS) kerana telahpun runding awal, 2 hari lepas Zahid Hamidi luluskan, BNS telah keluar surat niat.

DCNS kebetulan terlibat dlm skandal kapal selam Scorpene dahulu ImageImage
Read 10 tweets
Aug 16, 2022
A summary of the Federal Court's decision in rejecting Najib's application to adduce new evidence/witnesses on Nazlan's role in Maybank.

1. "New" minutes of meetings & letters had alrdy been served to Najib in 1MDB trial on 4.11.2019, 1 month before Defence's case in SRC trial
2. No relevance

Nazlan's role in Maybank in establishment of SRC (even if true) has no relevance to charges against Najib i.e. abuse of power.
3. Furthermore, Nazlan had no discreet/undisclosed interest in SRC's establishment to render him biased.

Also no evidence that Nazlan's role gave him particular knowledge to sustain factual & legal findings made against Najib
Read 6 tweets
Aug 16, 2022
Something is off.

Charges vs Ramli Nor relate to:

1) RM13 mil to Setaria Holding Ltd
2) RM1.3 mil to JSD Corporation Pte Ltd
3) RM6 mil to Sousmarin Armada Ltd

NONE of these companies mentioned in PAC Report.

Total sum is RM20+ million, peanuts compared to RM6bil scandal.
Main wrongdoings highlighted by PAC not unearthed in these charges:

1. Why was SIGMA design changed to GOWIND, leading to ex-Navy Chief saying "something is gravely wrong"? Who benefitted from this?

2. Why did BNS appoint CAD & CED, leading to balooning purchasing costs?
3. Why did Gov direct nego awarded contract to BNS, when it was alrdy in financial trouble & on contractual terms which PAC found extremely disadvantaged Gov? Who benefitted from this?

There are greater forces at play who are not held responsible.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 14, 2022
Isu Tuntutan USD15 Bilion Kesultanan Sulu & Aset Petronas

Banyak hujahan tak berasas, tak adil (disingenuous) & disulami emosi semata2 dilempar Najib.

Dilihat dari konteks undang2 timbangtara (arbitration) & antarabangsa, serta strategi perundangan, ini pandangan saya:
Persoalan utama adalah ini: Adakah surat Tommy Thomas menjadi sebab aset Petronas kononnya disita di Luxemborg?

Jawapan: Tidak.

Biar saya jelaskan.
(A) Sejak awal lagi, Msia tidak iktiraf prosiding/awad arbitration Dr Stampa yg arahkan Msia bayar USD 15bilion kpd waris Sulu.

2 sebab:

No.1: prinsip "sovereign immunity" - suatu negara berdaulat tidak boleh ditarik ke dlm prosiding undang2 di negara lain (Spain dlm kes ini).
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(