Day 7 of Julian #Assange's extradition hearing begins.

Live updates below:
John Goetz is today's first expert witness. He is a long-time journalist, has worked at the Sunday Times, Der Spiegel, LA Times. He also collaborated with #Assange on the documents @wikileaks published, notably the Afghan War Diary.
Goetz makes it clear that #Assange took extreme precautions to keep identities of informants and sources safe. White House was informed beforehand and around 15,000 documents ended up not being published in this endeavor alone.
It's clear according to Goetz that #Assange took these security measures seriously and he cannot think of or cite any examples of anyone being harmed as a result of @wikileaks publications.
Goetz: thanks to these @wikileaks cables they identified the kidnappers of German citizen Khaled El-Masri who had been taken and tortured when Macedonian police handed him over to the CIA in 2003. These cables also helped Masri win his case at the European Court of Human Rights.
Goetz: cables were instrumental in this regard and showed all kinds of pressure US was putting on Germany, threatening them not to take action over the Masri issue. Germany ended up issuing arrest warrants.
James Lewis QC of the prosecution rises to examine Goetz
Lewis questions Goetz about unredacted @wikileaks cables being published.

Goetz corrects Lewis on the timeline of events, reasserts that #Assange and WikiLeaks did everything they could to redact and were not responsible for passwords being leaked.
Lewis brings up joint statement from 2011 by the Guardian, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and others to condemn @wikileaks.

Goetz notes he was not working for Der Spiegel at the time and more importantly, this statement was issued before they had all the facts on what exactly happened.
Defense attempts to read aloud Khaled Al-Masri's statement to the court. Judge and prosecution object.
Defense briefly resumes cross-examination of Goetz.

Goetz once again says that according to his knowledge no one has ever been harmed by @wikileaks or #Assange's publications.
Court is in recess for an hour. Lots of discussion regarding admissibility of Al-Masri's statement, an innocent man who was captured and tortured by the CIA.
From Goetz' witness statement: "The important of the exposure of state criminality of the kind that occurred in Mr El-Masri's case cannot be overstated." #Assange @wikileaks
Here you can read Goetz' full witness statement which he delivered today at the #Assange extradition hearing.…
Regarding Khaled El-Masri's statement: defense wants to read it aloud and enter it into the record however prosecution keep objecting, refusing to acknowledge that US tortured him.…
Court adjourned for lunch. Resumes at 2:30pm local time
Prosecution is throwing a fit because they don’t want to admit to the record that the US tortured an innocent man and ironically this was uncovered by @wikileaks and #Assange’s work. Meanwhile they claim Assange endangered people’s lives but can’t put forward a single example.
The next witness to testify is Daniel Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg who published the Pentagon Papers in 1971; a slew of classified documents on the US’ role in Vietnam.
Ellsberg tells the court about his background, military service, publishing the Pentagon Papers with the New York Times and that he was also charged under the 1917 Espionage Act. Charges were dismissed due to misconduct by the US government.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg is tells the court he views the work #Assange and @wikileaks did as being of similar nature and caliber to what he did with the Pentagon Papers; identifies with Assange and Chelsea Manning @xychelsea for their dedication to let public know the truth.
In regards to #Assange, Daniel Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg says what Assange did is not "reckless" as the US government is trying to portray. Quite the contrary, he views the work @wikileaks did as being highly sophisticated, technical and done with a great deal of care.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg asserts that much like the Vietnam War, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars felt very similar in that they were wrong, immoral and abject failures in breach of international law. The public was misinformed, underscoring the importance of #Assange's work.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: the reports in the Afghan War Diary that Manning @xychelsea provided were just field reports, the kind he'd write in Vietnam. These are a lower level of classification but still included war crimes, showing how little the US cared to even cover them up.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: what I released were top secret documents, what @wikileaks was given by Manning @xychelsea were not. This shows a normalization of war crimes and torture within the US military.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg says Collateral Murder video showed a blatant war crime. His only 'problem' with it was the word "collateral", implying something accidental, when in fact the murder of Iraqi civilians and journalists by the US army in that video was clearly intentional.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg says he's glad people were able to see this video. What's shocking is that no one was punished and we were told this didn't violate the rules of engagement despite soldiers laughing and joking as they murdered civilians.
The Collateral Murder video in question:

Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg
: I was denied the chance to give my motive in court, on why I published the Pentagon Papers. This was unprecedented for a defendant charged under Esp Act. Likewise #Assange will be denied the opportunity to explain and not given a fair trial.
@DanielEllsberg to the court: "Julian #Assange could not remotely get a fair trial in the United States"
Prosecution to Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: you're aware #Assange isn't being prosecuted for the Collateral Murder video?

Ellsberg: yes, but the rules of engagement files in the indictment connect it to the video.
Prosecution asserts that #Assange is only being prosecuted for allegedly endangering lives/putting sources in danger.

Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: "that's misleading". Says Assange is being charged on multiple counts of conspiracy to solicit documents, possession and publication.
Prosecution tries to portray Ellsberg (to Ellsberg himself) as being "more careful" than #Assange for withholding some docs that he only gave to Congress and not media.

Ellsberg: I wanted to stop war, not diplomacy. I didn't want US gov to use them as excuse to stop negotiations
Prosecution asks Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: did you ever endanger lives with Pentagon Papers

Ellsberg: yes, in one case, Lucien Emile

Ellsberg asserts he left this unredacted so that the entire publication, unaltered would show all this killing was pointless and of no good.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg disagrees with the prosecution that WikiLeaks and Pentagon Papers are not alike.

Ellsberg: those who attack #Assange, Edward @Snowden, and Chelsea Manning @xychelsea don't understand my motives. @wikileaks also held docs and didn't publish just anything.
Ellsberg @DanielEllsberg: #Assange did undertake redactions and attempt to protect informants names, etc. US gov did nothing to prevent publication of sensitive info and let this happen in order to go after #Assange.

See Assange phoning Hillary here:
Lewis: are you claiming no one was endangered by publications?

Ellsberg: not on purpose, not by #Assange or @wikileaks

Lewis: what of those disappeared in Afghanistan, etc

Ellsberg: no proof of that. Even if true, that's a tiny fraction compared to the people killed by the US
Defense is re-examining Ellsberg now.
Ellsberg notes the hypocrisy at play: back when he published the Pentagon Papers, which contained hundreds of names including CIA informant Emile, he was vilified for decades.

Now in crusade against #Assange, his work is considered "patriotic" as opposed to "evil @WikiLeaks".
Ellsberg says he sees no tangible difference between his publications and #Assange's. He views @wikileaks' work as a public service crucial in combating misinformation and government lies. There is no evidence to suggest that WikiLeaks harmed anyone.
Ellsberg is asked one last question by the defense: you agree with AUSA Kromberg's statement that #Assange and @wikileaks' publications resulted in no deaths? And that this was also established during @xychelsea Manning's trial?

Ellsberg: Correct. No deaths.

End of testimony.
#Assange hearing is adjourned until tomorrow morning. I will be going live shortly to give a full video summary.

Subscribe for independent journalism:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Richard Medhurst

Richard Medhurst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @richimedhurst

27 Oct
LIVE THREAD: Julian Assange vs Govt of the United States

I’m attending #Assange’s High Court hearing remotely. I’ll have live updates below on the appeal hearing. This hearing is taking place at the Royal Courts of Justice, London.

Live updates below: Image
Hearing is set to begin shortly, at 10:30am local time. Connected with other journos.
In January, while agreeing with the political charges, Judge Baraitser ruled against extraditing Assange on grounds that prison conditions in the US would be too oppressive, and that extradition posed a heightened risk of suicide. The US has sought to appeal this.
Read 123 tweets
25 Oct
Breaking: US officials are now blaming Iran for the drone attack on the illegal US military base in al Tanf, Syria
Let's break this story down.

The Associated Press reports that US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, blame Iran for the attack on al Tanf.

They say "Iran resourced and encouraged the attack" but that the drones were not launched from Iran.…
Anonymous US officials: "They were Iranian drones, and Iran appears to have facilitated their use"

What does that mean? Were they transferred from Iran specifically for this use? Did Iran provide coordinates? Fuel? Paint and stickers for drones? What's with the vague language?
Read 9 tweets
20 Oct
BREAKING: The illegal US military base in al Tanf, Syria has been hit by a drone attack.
It was reported that the two israeli air strikes that bombed Syria last week, south of Palmyra, came from the direction of the base.
Moreover, 14 Syrian military personnel were killed this morning in Damascus by bombs planted on a bus.
Sky News Arabic says that according to a US military official from CENTCOM there were no casualties.
Reports that multiple drones hit the base, not just one.
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct
Today marks ten years since Gaddafi was murdered by NATO-backed rebels. The objective: to steal Libya's resources, and prevent African nations from adopting their own single currency, thereby threatening Western hegemony. My latest:…
"Gaddafi transformed Libya from one of the poorest countries on Earth into a rich, self-sufficient state, all while managing a tribal society in a country home to the largest oil reserves in Africa."
"During his 42 years in power, he increased the country’s literacy rate from 25% to 88%. Libyans enjoyed free healthcare, education, and a high standard of living. Electricity and gas were cheap, and the country was guaranteed a strong social safety net and welfare programs."
Read 10 tweets
20 Oct
BREAKING: terrorist attack in Damascus has killed 14 military personnel. Three wounded.
Military source tells SANA two bombs were planted on the bus itself. A third device was defused by army engineers. The explosion took place in central Damascus near Hafez Al Assad bridge.
Not clear if this is related, but a few hours after the blast there was shelling in Idlib province— the last terrorist stronghold in the country.
UNICEF says 4 children and a teacher on the way to school among the dead.
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
🔴 Nasrallah: "After WW2, the French resistance went after thousands of French collaborators for working with the Nazi occupation. When the israelis left south Lebanon, we did not hurt a single person, even though they collaborated with the israelis."
"The biggest threat to Christians in Lebanon is the Lebanese Forces party and its leader.”
Nasrallah straight up telling LF to sit tf down and behave 😂. I'll add more translations and bits of the speech shortly.

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!