Jim Bianco Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
A thread explaining why the bond market is asleep and what wakes it up.

---

The next chart shows the MOVE Index (Merrill Options Volatility Estimate). It is the “VIX of the bond market” and is near its lowest reading in history (which was set on July 30).

(1/10)
Should interest rates be this low? Consider these 2 charts.

The bond market often moves in tandem with commodities. But as the boxes show, that has not been the case recently.

Commodities are suggesting interest rates should be moving higher, but they are not.

(2/10)
* Top panel shows the SPX (log)
* Orange bars show the VIX’s close on days the SPX hit an all-time high (ATH).

VIX hit 26.57 when the SPX hit an all-time high on Sep-2. The VIX has never been higher with SPX at ATH.

Stocks are not exhibiting low levels of volatility.

(3/10)
Foreign exchange volatility hit a new low BEFORE the pandemic. But currency volatility has been on the rise lately and well off the pre-pandemic low.

No other markets are have low volatility levels like the bond markets.

(4/10)
So why is the bond market asleep?

The Fed, via Quantitative Easing (QE), has bought over $3.1 trillion of bonds since mid-March (bottom panel).

(5/10)
These purchases have rocketed the Fed’s holdings of fixed income securities to $6.3 trillion.

(6/10)
In a Nov 2010 Washington Post op-ed, Ben Bernanke explained the purpose of QE:

Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corp bond rates ...

(7/10)
... will encourage investment. And higher stocks will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.

(8/10)
By buying massive amounts of bonds, the Fed is suppressing interest rates and encouraging investors to seek riskier investments. And by signaling that they “have investors’ backs” they are promoting speculation (as can be seen in the options market lately).

(9/10)
We argue a significant rise in rates would be a big negative for all markets.

What would causes this rise? Inflation. The one thing bigger than the Fed is the collective of the bond mkt. Inflation returning chases bond investors out faster than the Fed can "print."

(10/10)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Jul 5
1/9

Since the 10 Spot ETFs started trading on January 11, they have collectively generated $14.6 billion in net new money. They peaked near $16 billion last month.

Collectively, these ETFs are the most successful ETF launches in history.

The problem might be they are successful for ETF providers but maybe not as much for BTC holders.

A 🧵to explain.Image
2/9

As I noted last month, most of this "new" ETF money was on-chain coins moved to regulated brokerage accounts that bought the BTC ETFs.

Of the peak inflows near $16 billion into BTC ETFs, only ~$3 billion was really "new" money into the BTC ecosystem.

3/9

The lack of a rally showed that the "new" money in the entire BTC ecosystem was small (~$3 billion). Despite all the bullish talk and "here come the boomers" proclamations, BTC peaked in March at $74k.

The BTC bulls were correct that near $16 billion of "new" money into the ecosystem should have pushed BTC to >$100k. However, it was not near $16 billion as most ETF flows came from on-chain accounts and not new fiat entering for the first time.

Further supporting this are the fears surrounding Mt. Gox liquidations. A total of $7.6 billion of BTC (140k BTC) is getting transferred. If $7.6 billion is hitting the price this much, and only a small portion will be liquidated for fiat, then near $16 billion of new BTC ETF money, if this was the case, should have skyrocketed the BTC price.

It did not happen.

forbes.com/sites/siladity…
Read 9 tweets
Jun 30
1/3

Breaking news Saturday night ... just as Biden arrives at the Hamptons fundraiser.

----

President Joe Biden is expected to discuss the future of his re-election campaign with family at Camp David on Sunday, following a nationally televised debate Thursday that left many fellow Democrats worried about his ability to beat former President Donald Trump in November, according to five people familiar with the matter.

nbcnews.com/politics/2024-…
2/3

Betting market reaction to this news ....

Notice who moved ahead of Gavin Newsom into second place for the Democrat nomination. Image
3/3

The last time Harris was ahead of Newsom for the Democrat Nomination ....

July 2022!! Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
1/4

Last week, BlackRock Admitted:

For now, about 80% of bitcoin ETF purchases have likely been coming from “self-directed investors who have made their own allocation, often through an online brokerage account."

cnbc.com/2024/06/16/adv…
2/4

The following chart shows that the average size of a Spot BTC ETF trade (blue) is just $14.6k, far less than any other ETFs that are very popular with Tradfi ... and about one-tenth the size of a SPY trade.

This is exactly what you'd expect if they buyer is retail Degens. Image
3/4

In other words, the chart above is consistent with BlackRock's statement that Tradfi is largely not playing. This blue line will go up when they start to play, which they are not doing now.

For now, the Spot BTC ETF buyer is a retail Degen, and as explained below, most of them came from on-chain accounts to a regulated brokerage account.

Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
1/8

Consumer Confidence came out today and contained a message for everyone interested in markets and the economy.

tl:dr - Consumer confidence came in much worse than expected. Driving this was Democrats turning sour on the economy. Behind this seems to be a big worry they are going to lose the election this fall.

Since so much of economic data is opinion surveys, like consumer confidence, economists will look at this data and conclude that it means the economy is worsening, not that these surveys are really political, not economic, opinions.

----

The University of Michigan put out its June estimate for Consumer Sentiment. It declined to 65.6, the lowest reading of 2024.Image
2/8

Bloomberg surveyed 50 economists, and they predicted Consumer Sentiment would rise from May's 69.1 to 72 in June. Instead, as shown above, it fell to 65.6.

Only one of the 50 economists had it this low. So, a big surprise. Image
3/8

What drove this downside surprise?

Here is a breakdown of consumer sentiment by (self-identified) political party.

You can see how partisanship drives one's outlook on the economy. What matters is your political identification and which party controls the White House, not an objective assessment of the economy.

Not that Democrat sentiment (blue) in June fell almost 7 points whereas Republican sentiment (red) fell less than 0.5 of a point.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 12
1/5

What I'm looking for at the FOMC meeting today.

tl:dr - The long-term dot or their estimate of the neutral funds rate.
---
This FOMC releases a new Dot Plot every quarter (M/J/S/D). Here is March.

Every dot is an FOMC participant forecast. The orange line is the median.

The Street's focus is the 2024 dots. The median (red line) was for 3 cuts. Will that come down to 1 or 2?Image
2/5

Instead, I'm looking at the long-term dot. As noted above, it is 2.56%

Here are all the long-term dots back to 2018. It was steady at 2.50% until a slight increase at the March meeting to 2.56%.

It has not moved for years, so it has been forgotten. But it might be ready to move now, and that matters.Image
3/5

The long-term dot is the Fed projection for the neutral rate, or R*.

The Fed has consistently maintained that the long-run inflation is 2%, and they augment this by 0.5% to reach 2.5% (again R*).

There has been much talk that the neutral fund rate has moved higher. If the long-run inflation is now 3% to 4% (chart), and given the uncertainty, it should push the 0.5% to 1.0%, this puts the neural fund's rate between 4% and 5%. Many are making this argument; I am, too.

I do not expect the Fed to jump all the way to 4% today, but do we see upward movement in the neutral funds today? The start of a trend?Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 5
1/4

Lots of talk about an economic slowdown, but what exactly is slowing down?

tl:dr, surveys of opinions, not actual or "hard" data.
---
Start with the Bloomberg Surprise Index. It is an index of economic releases measured against the consensus forecast for each release.

How to read it?

A number above zero means the economic data is coming in above expectations, and a number below zero means worse than expectations. The trend matters as it shows whether things are improving or deteriorating (again relative to expectations).

What does it say?

The economy has turned sharply lower (steep downtrend) and, since the beginning of April, coming in much worse than forecasted (below zero).

Sound ominous. However ....Image
2/4

The chart above can be broken into two broad categories, shown below:

* Hard data (blue), which are actual measures of economic performance. Think retail sales, durable goods, auto sales (number of cars sold), international trade, etc.

* Soft data (orange) that measures surveys of how various economic actors think the economy is doing. Think consumer confidence, the Institute of Supply Management report of manufacturing (it is a survey of purchasing managers' opinions, not an actual measure of activity), the regional Fed Reserve surveys of activity, and the Conference Board Index of Leading Economic Indicators.

What does it say?

The soft data (orange) is falling apart fast and well below zero. This is the so-called "vibecession." People feel lousy about the economy.

But the hard data (blue), in this case, the measures of the labor market, are holding up reasonably well. This measure is still above zero and generally moves sideways in the better-than-expected range.Image
3/4

Like the hard data measure of labor above, below are the hard data measures of retail activity (green) and the Household (green).

The are also above zero and not meaningfully trending lower. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(