A thread explaining why the bond market is asleep and what wakes it up.
---
The next chart shows the MOVE Index (Merrill Options Volatility Estimate). It is the “VIX of the bond market” and is near its lowest reading in history (which was set on July 30).
(1/10)
Should interest rates be this low? Consider these 2 charts.
The bond market often moves in tandem with commodities. But as the boxes show, that has not been the case recently.
Commodities are suggesting interest rates should be moving higher, but they are not.
(2/10)
* Top panel shows the SPX (log)
* Orange bars show the VIX’s close on days the SPX hit an all-time high (ATH).
VIX hit 26.57 when the SPX hit an all-time high on Sep-2. The VIX has never been higher with SPX at ATH.
Stocks are not exhibiting low levels of volatility.
(3/10)
Foreign exchange volatility hit a new low BEFORE the pandemic. But currency volatility has been on the rise lately and well off the pre-pandemic low.
No other markets are have low volatility levels like the bond markets.
(4/10)
So why is the bond market asleep?
The Fed, via Quantitative Easing (QE), has bought over $3.1 trillion of bonds since mid-March (bottom panel).
(5/10)
These purchases have rocketed the Fed’s holdings of fixed income securities to $6.3 trillion.
(6/10)
In a Nov 2010 Washington Post op-ed, Ben Bernanke explained the purpose of QE:
Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corp bond rates ...
(7/10)
... will encourage investment. And higher stocks will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.
(8/10)
By buying massive amounts of bonds, the Fed is suppressing interest rates and encouraging investors to seek riskier investments. And by signaling that they “have investors’ backs” they are promoting speculation (as can be seen in the options market lately).
(9/10)
We argue a significant rise in rates would be a big negative for all markets.
What would causes this rise? Inflation. The one thing bigger than the Fed is the collective of the bond mkt. Inflation returning chases bond investors out faster than the Fed can "print."
(10/10)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone needs to calm down about the Atlanta Fed GDPnow flipping to negative (chart).
It was driven by one statistic, merchandise trade imports, which can snap back as early as next month and take GDPnow back up.
The world is not ending.
2/4
Here is the Merchandise trade deficit.
I labeled the last three months to show how much it blew out (and March 2022).
3/4
The trade deficit exploded in the last three months, as well as March 2022, due to the surge in imports (orange) while exports (blue) remained relatively unchanged.
---
The Ukraine War started in March 2022, and importers rushed to import products (such as grain) from the Black Sea area ahead of potential disruption.
Similarly, the last three months have seen importers rush to bring goods into the country ahead of Trump's tariffs.
The status quo cannot last. If we do nothing, it ends badly. What is the alternative?
Most of it has either already happened, or is underway. We weren't aware of the name.
2/16
Powell on Dec 4, 2024 - “The U.S. federal budget is on an unsustainable path. The debt is not at an unsustainable level, but the path is unsustainable, and we know that we have to change that"
I have not posted a spot $BTC ETF update in a while, so here is one.
These ETFs started trading a year ago (Jan 11, 2024). Their total assets are $114 billion. (Note that they started at $29B on day 1 due to the $GBTC conversion.)
Three funds make up the vast majority.
2/5
The net NEW money invested in all Spot BTC ETFs was $36.69B (bottom panel).
This excludes the $29B of $GBTC conversion on day 1.
3/5
The dollar cost average purchase price is $BTC $74.3k (blue line), representing an unrealized gain of ~25%, or $12.73B (bottom panel).
The repost below expresses a common belief that risk assets are effective inflation hedges.
History suggests they are not.
This chart shows that the inflation of the 1960s and 1970s wiped out 64% of the after-inflation stock gains by 1982 (meaning inflation beat stocks by 64%). And all inflation-adjusted gains of the previous 27+ years (back to 1954) were gone (meaning inflation beat stocks over the previous 27 years).
It took until 1992, 28 years later, for stocks to finally start beating cumulative inflation since 1966.
2/3
Too many vastly underestimate the devastating impact of inflation.
Since the 2021 peak, when the Fed called inflation"transitory," stocks have only beaten inflation by just 15% (with dividends).
So a 10% to 12% correct and a little bit more inflation and four years of relative purchasing power is gone (meaning you are no better off than four years ago).
3/3
As I argue here, the crypto crowd also forgets inflation when they make their long-term forecasts.