A thread explaining why the bond market is asleep and what wakes it up.
---
The next chart shows the MOVE Index (Merrill Options Volatility Estimate). It is the “VIX of the bond market” and is near its lowest reading in history (which was set on July 30).
(1/10)
Should interest rates be this low? Consider these 2 charts.
The bond market often moves in tandem with commodities. But as the boxes show, that has not been the case recently.
Commodities are suggesting interest rates should be moving higher, but they are not.
(2/10)
* Top panel shows the SPX (log)
* Orange bars show the VIX’s close on days the SPX hit an all-time high (ATH).
VIX hit 26.57 when the SPX hit an all-time high on Sep-2. The VIX has never been higher with SPX at ATH.
Stocks are not exhibiting low levels of volatility.
(3/10)
Foreign exchange volatility hit a new low BEFORE the pandemic. But currency volatility has been on the rise lately and well off the pre-pandemic low.
No other markets are have low volatility levels like the bond markets.
(4/10)
So why is the bond market asleep?
The Fed, via Quantitative Easing (QE), has bought over $3.1 trillion of bonds since mid-March (bottom panel).
(5/10)
These purchases have rocketed the Fed’s holdings of fixed income securities to $6.3 trillion.
(6/10)
In a Nov 2010 Washington Post op-ed, Ben Bernanke explained the purpose of QE:
Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corp bond rates ...
(7/10)
... will encourage investment. And higher stocks will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.
(8/10)
By buying massive amounts of bonds, the Fed is suppressing interest rates and encouraging investors to seek riskier investments. And by signaling that they “have investors’ backs” they are promoting speculation (as can be seen in the options market lately).
(9/10)
We argue a significant rise in rates would be a big negative for all markets.
What would causes this rise? Inflation. The one thing bigger than the Fed is the collective of the bond mkt. Inflation returning chases bond investors out faster than the Fed can "print."
(10/10)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The immediate pushback is familiar: this “supply shock” will hurt real growth, so the Fed should cut rates.
This well-known economist has been making exactly that argument.
3/4
That is only half the equation. A supply shock hurts growth, but it also raises inflation, so the real question is which side dominates.
In 2022, inflation rose more than real growth fell: the blue CPI line and arrow moved sharply higher while the green real-GDP bars and arrow moved modestly lower. The bottom panel shows the Fed’s answer: hikes, not cuts, as the federal funds rate moved from near zero in early 2022 to above 4% by year-end 2022.
Why? When inflation rises faster than growth falls, nominal growth (real GDP plus inflation) rises. If today’s oil shock does the same thing as 2022, the correct takeaway is not automatic cuts. It is possible that the Fed may have to stand pat or even consider hiking.
Ten seafarers have now been killed in 13 attacks on merchant vessels since the Iran conflict erupted on February 28 — more than the 7 U.S. servicemen killed in the war.
The focal point is shifting: can the Strait of Hormuz be reopened? Is the Administration pivoting to that mission?
Every day without a visible path to reopening, the market will price in more risk.
A 10% increase in energy prices that persists for a year would push global inflation up by 40 basis points and slow economic growth by 0.1-0.2%, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said.
So, what price measures "persists for a year?"
🧵
2/5
As the table below shows, crude oil futures prices for delivery into 2027 are trading in extreme backwardation.
3/5
Below is the calendar spread between the first contract (now April) and the 6th contract (now September).
As the bottom panel shows, this spread is -25%, a record since the mid-1990s when the contract specifications were last changed.