Remember Steve Linick? The State Dept watchdog ousted during probes into Secy of State Pompeo’s alleged misuse of funds? The man Linick accused of "bullying" him, under Secy of State for Mgmt Brian Bulatao testifies before Congress today. Story to come.
Background here via my trusty former colleague Tim Ryan:
Live-stream available here, hosted by the @HouseForeign Affairs Cmte:
In addition to Brian Bulatao, also testifying today:
Marik String, acting legal adviser for the State Dept &
R. Clarke Cooper, ass't Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs
The anticipated q's for State officials today will be whether Linick's removal was part of a campaign to keep quiet IG findings that said the '19 emergency declaration for $8B in arms to Saudi Arabia was done without risk assessment for civilian casualties, legal considerations
House Foreign Affairs cmte chair Eliot Engel to Bulatao: "What this is all about is you and Secy Pompeo apparently think you should be able to do whatever you want and not face accountability and scrutiny of any kind."
Engel continues: "Congress is blocking weapons sales? Find a way around it. IG looking into how the secretary spends taxpayers’ money? Fire him. Report shows we made up a phony emergency and didn't do our due diligence to prevent civilians from being killed. Cover it up, spin it"
Engel: "Hide it in a classified annex. Redact redact redact, And you pat yourself on the back that you technically follow process laid out in law. Yeah, more children may die but your scheme to make an end run around Congress wasn’t illegal, strictly speaking. Congratulations."
Bulatao: Linick's removal was not retaliation. The secy did not remove Linick because of awareness to investigations. Those allegations of retaliation "could not be further from the truth" and are without "any factual basis or truth."
Linick, he says, failed to lead w/integrity.
STORY: Officials from the State Department staunchly defended President Donald Trump for his abrupt firing of a federal watchdog investigating weapons sales to Saudi Arabia and possible abuse of power by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
MORE: courthousenews.com/state-departme…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As the release of the anticipated appendix to Jack Smith’s legal brief is due today, I will now begin a live-tweet thread unpacking the Legal Framework section of the immunity brief in Trump's Jan. 6 election subversion case.
I already unpacked a section establishing evidence Smith intends to use at trial, should that ever happen, but I have some links for you here now to revisit at your convenience.
But this thread is more digesting what Smith wrote in immunity brief re: Legal Framework, or why...
...in light of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, Trump’s alleged conduct before/on Jan. 6 is prosecutable.
NEW: Vem Miller sues Sheriff Chad Bianco for defamation, alleging Bianco wrongly stated that he thwarted Miller's assassination attempt of DJT. Miller says most "egregious" stmt by Bianco was that he had fake creds; Miller says campaign gave it to him. I asked. They denied that.
I'd like to also point out that Mr. Miller is represented by Sigal Chattah. Ms. Chattah is the national committeewoman for the NV GOP.
I called Ms. Chattah a few days ago actually, seeking a comment from her about whether she had any idea how Miller was credentialed. No response. I called every member of the NV GOP that I couald get contact info for, and when I spoke to Mr. Jim Hindle, NV GOP vice chair...
It's Christmas Day 2020. Pence calls Trump to wish him a Merry Christmas.
Trump raises the certification on Jan. 6 and tells his running mate he's got "discretion in his role" as pres. of the Sen. Pence replies: 'You know, I dont think I have the authority to change the outcome'
Trump, the very next day sends out this tweet:
There's less than two weeks until Congress meets for the certification.
I will now continue my live-tweet thread reviewing special counsel Jack Smith’s brief outlining the case he intends to bring against Donald Trump for allegedly conspiring to overturn the 2020 election and more.
OK - So we pick up with the allegations laid out re: Michigan and Smith begins on Nov. 20, 2020 a few days before the guv of MI signed the certificate appointing Biden's electors. Trump meets with P37, who is Mike Shirkey, MI Sen. Maj Ldr., and P38=MI House Speaker Lee Chatfield
Trump gets this mtg through the help of RNC Chairwoman P39, who in 2020, was Ronna Romney McDaniel. Trump wanted her there but Smith says that Ronna told Trump her attorney advised against it. There's an introduction made, and Trump invites Shirkey and Chatfield to the WH
Jack Smith has filed the much-anticipated brief in Donald Trump's Jan. 6 election subversion case.
Let's walk through it together in this thread. big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2…
First things first, what we are we looking at with this document?
This filing is the framework Smith has set for Chutkan to make her analysis under the parameters of the SCOTUS immunity ruling for former presidents and he has broken it down into 4 parts.
The parts of the immunity brief are broken into 4 sections: 1) What Smith intends to prove at trial 2) The legal principles that govern presidential immunity and how Trump acted as office-seeker, not office-holder 3) How legal principles apply to Trump's conduct 4) Relief sought