Justin Alexander Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020 37 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Live-tweeting reactions to #IcewindDale: Rime of the Frostmaiden, but trying something different: I'll have one thread of stuff I didn't like (this one) and another thread of stuff I did (link below).
As with previous live-tweeting threads and Remixes, my emphasis here will not be "this bad, me hate"; expect critical thinking and in-depth discussions of scenario structures and best DM practices.
300 page adventures need indexes.

And if you don't have an index, you'd better make really, really, really, really sure the Table of Contents doesn't have errors in it.
Somebody said, "Wouldn't it be cool if we had a system where the PCs could gain Reputation in Ten-Towns?"

And then like two paragraphs later they were like, "Eh. Fuck it."
"...they no long (sic) gain levels by completing the quests in this chapter. Even so, completing more ... quests can improve their [reputation]."

2 paragraphs later: Reputation is only tracked by what level you've achieved!
How few fucks were given?

Page 18: "When the characters reach 4th level, they ... also learn about new adventure opportunities outside Ten-Towns, as described in chapter 2."

Chapter 2: "By the time the characters reach 3rd level..."
Also: That is not how tall tales work.

1. Tall tales are not completely reliable sources of information with attached action items. They're, like, the opposite of that.
2. Tall tales are not zealously guarded secrets which communities refuse to share with outsiders. They're usually icebreakers.

(Icebreakers! Get it?!)
Exactly.

More discussion of this later, but Rime is structured around two rumor tables: Stage 1 rumors are immediately available; Stage 2 rumors unlock at 3rd (4th?) level.

What would be cool is a Tall Tales table that could be used in concert with Stage 1 rumors to lay pipe for the Stage 2 rumors (and beyond).

So you get some tall tales about the ancient frost giants and then LATER you get an actionable lead to their abandoned thrones.
This is a cool idea. I wonder if you could build out a Reputation system that would modify the Friendliness rating of the community?

Accumulate Heroic Reputation to boost the effective Friendliness of a town. Villanous Reputation does the opposite.

Re: Starting Quests.

Conceptually, yes.

In practice, unfortunately, they don't work very well: The quests are just... boring. They're boring in concept and they're boring to do.

And this is one of the worst scenario hooks I've ever read.

It's comically bad.
"Hello. Yes. I would like to pay you 100 gp to kill this random person because he is a serial killer.... I mean, maybe? Who knows, really. I have no actual evidence that he's the killer. Hell, I don't even know if he was actually in the same town where the killings happened...
...but maybe, just maybe, the killer is working for the Frostmaiden. Or maybe not. But if the killer IS working for the Frostmaiden, then MAYBE he would be immune to the cold. And this guy doesn't wear a coat. So... yeah. Definitely the killer."
That's pretty ridiculous. But then it gets dumber.

Quest-Giver: "I followed Torg's caravan for 10 days."

PCs: "So where is it now?"

QG: "I have no idea."
QG followed them for 10 days, became convinced they were the killer, and then... left and went to a completely different town? So that they could sit in a tavern and stare at strangers until randomly deciding which one they would ask to go kill somebody on their laughable say-so?
The crazy thing is that the QG is completely right: The Frostmaiden is sending Sephek around to kill people who bribe officials to take their name off the sacrifice lottery.
Okay... But... Only three of the Ten-Towns even do the human sacrifice thing. If the Frostmaiden is killing people for not being available as sacrifices, why isn't Sephek targeting the other seven towns?
Finally, and I recognize this is fairly petty compared to the other big problems here:

This is not how fencing stolen goods works.

Stealing shit does not automatically double its market price. Generally speaking, the exact opposite is true.
(Upon further consideration: It would actually make more sense for Sephek to be targeting the seven towns that aren't offering human sacrifices.

(a) Auril probably doesn't actually want to micro-manage the sacrifice program...
(b) It gives you more murders, which helps make the serial killer a more palpable threat.

(c) If the killer is claiming a victim each month, then the QG can be concerned that, with another new moon passing, there'll be a new cycle of killings beginning.)
LOL.

This is truth, but I'm also OK with it: There's a full range here from "dark secret that may kill you" to "silly bit of trivia."

This lets the DM dial in the tone they want (easy enough to yank a couple of the secret cards).

But having that breadth in a single group can also be good: The disparity of experience creates texture.

It can also create surprise: If I get "I know Chewbacca" I may assume other secrets are similar. Which leaves my jaw on the table when a xenomorph bursts out of your chest.
Re: Rumors.

There are two problems with doing rumors like this.

First, the initiation of action is inverted. The GM shouldn't be saying, "Lo! Thou hast done a thing!" Instead, establish that "looking for rumors" is a thing they can do as a default action.
Second, the point of having a rumor table is generally to give the group LOTS of rumors (i.e., scenario hooks) that they can then choose between and prioritize.

thealexandrian.net/wordpress/3753…
Doling them out one at a time is to shoot yourself in the foot. (And is likely to result in the need for a "Lo! Thou hast.." moment.)
Now, when they come back for the Stage 2 rumors (aka "tall tales"), they get the "give 'em lots of rumors" thing right.

But they're still "Lo! Thou hast!"-ing it all over the place.

This stuff should be coming organically out of the game world, not being decreed from on high.
This is a legacy issue, but let's talk about why this is bad design.

You have a set of mechanics that emphasize the Frostmaiden's harsh winter in #IcewindDale... but the mechanics are completely negated by spending 10gp on cold weather clothing.
The mechanic can't be used to build interesting challenges or even establish tone. It's just a tiny tax and an arbitrary bit of irrelevant bookkeeping that is then completely ignored.
This is a wide-ranging problem in 5th Edition's design, where they've kept a lot of the mechanics that were used to create unique and varied challenges in previous editions... but then presented completely trivial mechanical solutions that automatically solve the problem for you.
Previous editions often had similar mechanics that REMOVED GAMEPLAY from the game, but they were introduced at HIGHER LEVELS.

So you experienced the game play for awhile, and then the game mechanically shuffled the old challenges off the table and introduced new ones.
This is a really big and pretty fundamental problem with 5th Edition's core design. And you can see here in #IcewindDale how it cripples interesting scenario design.

I talk about this in more detail in The Subtle Shifts of Play.

thealexandrian.net/wordpress/7632…
Re: Reputation.

Yes.

This really is live-tweeting, so I haven't read the whole book. But it seems like the over-arching thrust is that the PCs will rise up, overthrow the Frostmaiden, and lead #IcewindDale out of her horrible winter.

Done correctly, a solid Reputation system could really heighten that story and make it viscerally meaningful: The players would really be able to feel themselves becoming heroes of the Dale, and those mechanics could feed back into the narrative.
On the flip-side, let's say that we DIDN'T want to do any of that.

What would better than this?

No mechanic at all.

The only thing Reputation is doing in #IcewindDale, AFAICT, is unlocking the Stage 2 rumors. So... just do that. No need for an extra conceptual hoop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Alexander

Justin Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hexcrawl

Oct 10
Step 1: When you place a secret, you have to be at peace with the idea that the PCs may never find that secret.

If you're not, then the secret isn't really a secret. It's a pantomime.

(This thread will make more sense if you read James' full tweet.)
"I then decide to elaborate about the dust, so they don't miss the secret; now I'm the one deciding whether they find the secret!"

Right. So don't do that.

That's going to solve a bunch of your problems.
First decision you make is how obvious the secret is. This is roughly a spectrum:

- No clue at all; they'd need a blind search to see it.
- Indication only noticed with examination.
- Indication that could be noticed in the initial room description.
- Big sign pointing at it.
Read 27 tweets
Jun 7
Hypothesis: The beholder's mouth gets larger with each new edition.

Let's start with the original 1975 appearance on the cover of Supplement I: Greyhawk. Image
Okay, let's compare AD&D 1E (Tom Wham) to AD&D 2E (Jeff Easley).

Here I think you could argue that the 1E beholder has a wider mouth, but I definitely think the 2E has more maw.
Image
Image
Now AD&D 2E (Jeff Easley) to D&D 3E (Scott Fischer).

Bigger teeth. Bigger mouth.
Beholder, AD&D 2e (Jeff Easley)
Behlder, D&D 3e (Scott Fischer)
Read 9 tweets
Jan 22
This article was removed because it was attracting transphobes and its original purpose was also defunct.

Core claims from the article and the discussion at the time it was written:

1. You shouldn't deadname people.
2. However, the ethics of re-editing material written before a name change is complicated.

3. If Jennell requested a change to the original article, I would change it.

(She did, and I did.)
For better or for worse, I stand by those claims.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 22
I have been asked to respond to this post.

Short version: The post is not only lying about what I said, it's also wrong about what Jennell said and what Jennell's wife has said.

diyanddragons.blogspot.com/2024/01/xander…
For one example completely out of my control, the post claims Jennell's wife said she was in a coma on November 1st in the GoFundMe updates.

You can go look: That's not true.

(Make a donation while you're there.)

gofundme.com/f/jennell-jaqu…
The post is, IMO, deceptive in countless ways, for example by claiming that my descriptions of private messaging in the spring of 2023 is actually describing a public comment on a deleted blog post from 2018.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
When I did theater, we would periodically run into "my significant other is uncomfortable with my character (me) kissing someone onstage."

Never once had someone's significant other get concerned about their significant other getting stabbed or haunted by a ghost on stage.
Remove the script and the formality of the stage and... well...
I'm not even saying "it's because people will get concerned." I'm saying human emotion is complicated and personal comfort with emotion, particularly in Puritanical America, is varied.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 19, 2023
Re: 5E DMG. #dnd

A lot is made of chapter order (start by creating a pantheon of gods!). That's easy to point to, but is really only representative of the more fundamental problem:

The designers didn't have a clear vision for the structure of play. Cover of 5E Dungeon Master'...
So there's a bunch of stuff, but very little of it is actually connected to any clear function. It seems mostly sourced from other D&D books and a vague sense that this is "cool" or "should be there."

Which makes it tough for the reader to come to grips with it.
It's like a hoarder's garage. If you dig through it, you're occasionally like, "Holy crap! There's a 3D printer in here!"

The print head is missing and you'll need to track down some filament before you can use it, but... 3D printer! Wow!
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(