At last, the Guardian and much of the UK media is forced to acknowledge Sweden's moderate approach to COVID is paying dividends. Unlike other European countries there's (so far) no second wave; despite no masks and a minimal lockdown; and all by consent👇 theguardian.com/world/2020/sep…
2./ Their strategy wasn't without its problems (care homes yet again) and it might not have worked in the UK at the beginning but their strategy has been consistent and is sustainable. Here's a reminder of how the same paper once described their approach 👇
3./ First they compared it to Russian roulette (as if imploding the economy doesn't cost lives or impact on health). Then a few mavericks were rounded up to claim it was going to lead to catastrophe. One scientist even predicted ICUs were poised to run out. They never did👇
4./ Then they claimed officials were involved in a cover up to engineer...herd immunity. As if that was a dastardly plot when in the absence of a vaccine or total eradication of the virus (who would bet on that?) may well end up having to be part of everyone solution.👇
5./ When things did go awry (as they did elsewhere) and the vulnerable were not protected sufficiently they pounced on this as proof the whole strategy was misconceived, ignoring the fact the elderly died here, as well as in Spain and France, even with their tough lockdowns👇
6./ The @guardian couldn't miss an opportunity to squeeze a public health crisis through the filter of its woke view of the world, suggesting the Swedish strategy was somehow feeding a "nationalist" narrative. They even dropped the B word. It had echoes of Brexit apparently🤦♂️
7./ By the end of May when Sweden briefly had the highest per capita deaths in Europe the Guardian and all the British media were reading the last rites on the strategy, convinced the Swedes had made an almighty mistake, & dredging up ex-officials to skewer it.👇
8./ But here we are now with fewer cases in Sweden than almost anywhere else. No second wave, despite most schools, bars, restaurants, and business staying open, protecting incomes. Instead doubts are emerging about models that led to our lockdown. 👇cityam.com/its-time-epide…
9./ So what does this prove? When it comes to the media and science the problem we have isn't herd immunity, which may or may not turn out to be a crucial asset in re-opening society but a lazy media herd instinct that drives a rush to judgement based on little or no evidence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵Neil Mackay -the Glasgow journalist time forgot- has a new antisemitic conspiracy that's getting him semi-hard. An Israeli firm targetted Scottish elections ...apparently. Mackay who hasn't had an original idea since 1998 is excited. Problem is...👉 heraldscotland.com/politics/viewp…
2./ Forget the idiocy of imagining anyone more than 200 miles from Carnoustie cares what John Swinney does. What is it Mackay suspects Israeli interference wanted to achieve? Ruin Holyrood by ensuring lunatics got elected? This isn't Mackay's first antisemitic rodeo.👉
3./ Who can forget the thoroughly bonkers conspiracy theory about 9/11 Mackay chose to amplify in 2003? It claimed Mossad knew about the plot to hit the Twin Towers yet failed to alert the Americans. The “evidence” this gasbag relied on? Wait till you hear what it was. 👉
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex.
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism.
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously?