I've just exited all my yield farms, the risk adjusted returns just aren't there anymore
For good yield you now have to deposit into pool2 (lol no thanks), be the first to hear about a new crop and ape in (rugpull risk), or stick with pool1 for a measly 100% APY (not worth IL)
It was inevitable that these foodcoin ponzis would come to an end, however if you know how to play these games right (as I've taught), you should be well in the green by now anyways
I'll still be on the lookout for new crops, but as things die down, lower your risk, not raise it
As time goes on and yield continues to drop, the rugpull risk will continue to rise, lowering risk adjusted returns even further
Find out who the suckers are, because if you don't, you're probably the sucker who will get left holding the bags
Not making an opinion about the quality of any DeFi product, but just a reminder that you need to take risk-adjusted returns into account when deciding where to put your funds
Are you okay paying 1,000+ Gwei transactions if you need to wind down your position?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reason why @Coinbase Commerce doesn’t support self-custody $BTC baselayer payments is simple
UXTO chains like Bitcoin lack the programmability necessary to meet the requirements of most merchants
1) Merchants don’t want to be exposed to crypto price volatility risk
Ethereum and EVM chains solve this by being able to programmatically covert whatever crypto token is used as payment into a stablecoin like $USDC, when can then be optionally redeemed for $USD and sent to the merchant’s bank account
UXTO-based chains like $BTC lack the native programmability to convert their native asset into stablecoins onchain, so a custodial solution is required
2) Merchants don’t want to deal with manual burden of resolving incorrect payments (eg: underpayment)
Ethereum and EVM chains solve this by being to programmatically reject payment with incorrect payment amounts
This is literally a single line of code in a smart contract (require payment amount == invoice amount, otherwise revert)
UXTO-based chains like $BTC lack the native programmability to revert payments based on amount, so a custodial solution is required
—
Net result is that Coinbase made a calculated decision that the overhead/friction/cost of supporting baselayer $BTC payments was simply not worth it
Payment processing for self-custodial wallets is challenging, it’s not nearly as a simple as just giving a customer an address to pay into, they will fuck it up, it needs to be idiot-proofed
Can lightning fix this for $BTC? Possibility, but there’s a great deal of friction today in terms of managing inbound/outbound liquidity and channel rebalancing
Lightning also means you can support one additional asset, $BTC, while integrating with EVM chains means you can accept hundreds to thousands of crypto-assets (including stablecoins and $WBTC) and get paid directly into your bank account programmatically if you desire
That said, I hope Lightning improves enough to make it a realistic option for merchants to leverage
Additional context/commentary from the Coinbase Commerce team themselves about UXTO payment support:
Obligatory thread of some of my unfiltered thoughts and predictions regarding the major crypto trends this year
🧵
• Bitcoin as a Dominant Asset Class
The catalysts for $BTC are clear; a dozen or so spot ETFs a week from approval, halving in April, multiple interest rate cuts, and fiat money printer brrrrr
Initial ETF inflows won’t be as massive as expected but will ramp up over the year
$BTC spot ETF Issuers will battle over management fees (sub 40bps fees), advertising will be strong (Super Bowl ads), and a lawsuit with the SEC over allowing in-kind issuance/redemption vs just cash
$ETH ETF will be next and then no ETFs for other tokens this year (2025 tho…)
1. Risk of staking ETH 2. Risk of liquid staking ETH 3. Risk of restaking ETH 4. Risk of liquid restaking ETH
You’re not only exposed to slashing and smart contract bug risk at each tier, but risks that only appear when composing protocols
Hell, why not take this further
Deposit your liquid restaking token into an AMM DEX, get an LP token back in return, and then deposit that LP token into a money market as collateral so you can borrow even more ETH to liquid restake
What started as a single ETH/USD Price Feed has since expanded into a fully-featured platform of services
There are now 1,000+ #Chainlink oracle networks that span external data, offchain compute, and cross-chain interoperability
A thread 🧵
Oracles connect blockchains to external systems, enabling them to execute based on inputs/outputs from the real world
Before chainlink, oracles were highly centralized and insecure, with frequent oracle attacks resulting in exploits and loss of funds
garbage in -> garbage out
Chainlink solved this problem through the creation of decentralized oracle networks (DONs), backed by strong cryptoeconomic incentives and high quality node operators
Arta TechFin, a Hong Kong-based financial services institution, is collaborating with #Chainlink Labs on the creation of regulated, fiat-based, cross-chain tokenized funds 👀
Chainlink CCIP will enable the transfer of fund tokens across public and private chains, increasing liquidity through cross-chain atomic settlement
Chainlink Data Feeds will provide transparent data for onchain Net Asset Value (NAV) reporting, making the data instantly available to all market participants
Chainlink Proof of Reserve will verify that the onchain fund tokens are backed and secured by designated assets under traditional and crypto custodians
The future is on
Arta TechFin (HKSE: 0279) is a hybrid financial (HyFi) platform bridging traditional finance with blockchain-based financial system via technology innovations
Its regulated one-stop solution enables corporates, financial institutions, and family offices to access traditional assets and digital assets
Arta TechFin, through its various subsidiaries, are licensed under Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission
Other licenses include Hong Kong Stock Exchange participant, insurance brokerage license, trustee license and money lending license in Hong Kong as well as Eurex and Chicago Mercantile Exchange participants
@SergeyNazarov on the collaboration at @HongKongFinTech Week:
And not because of flimsy handwavey narratives or vague hyped up “connections”
But because @Chainlink has been working directly with the largest financial institutions globally on accelerating tokenized asset adoption via #CCIP
🧵
The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (@swiftcommunity) on using CCIP for interoperability
Swift is used by 11,500+ financial institutions globally for inter-bank messaging, facilitating international money/security transfers swift.com/news-events/pr…
Participants in the Swift blockchain interoperability collaboration included 12+ of the largest financial institutions and market infrastructure providers in the world including: