Wokal Distance Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/

Let's talk about the lying going on in this study that says "white evangelicals" have the highest levels of "racial resentment"

We need to understand why they do stuff like this an how to call it out.

2/
This study claims to measure "racial resentment" by making statements and asking people how much they agree. It claims that the way people answer the questions will indicate how much "racial resentment" they have

That is what they claim to do. They do something else entirely.
3/
When we look at the questions asked, you will quickly notice that none of the questions ask about resentment. In fact, the questions don't ask people how they feel about other races AT ALL.

Here are the questions, take a look then I'll show you how what they're doing
4/
Questions one asks if you agree that Blacks can "work their way up" and "overcome prejudice" the way other races in the have. The examples given are Italians, Irish, and Jews.

The study says if you agree, your agreement with that statement counts as racial resentment.
5/
To start off, in lumping the Irish and Italians in with Jews as examples of a groups working their way up, a study that claims to tell us about race relations in the U.S., ignores how differently Jews are treated from Irish and Italians in the U.S.

Don't worry, it gets worse:
6/
Because if you look at the population statistics and hate crime numbers, Jews are more then twice as likely as blacks to be the victims of hate crimes, and yet this study puts them in the same category as Italians.
7/
When their study implies Jews worked their way up the same way as the Irish and Italians they call that "rigorous research questions." If you think Blacks can work their way up the same way as the Irish and Italians that's "racial resentment."

The hypocrisy is killing me
8/
Questions 2,3, and 4 all have to do with why people think Blacks have worse economic and social mobility outcomes than whites. If your answer places the burden on the individuals rather then slavery and discrimination (I don't btw) they say you have "racial resentment"
9/
I happen to think discrimination and slavery have a lot to do with why there is disparity in outcomes between Blacks and Whites, but that's not because I have "low racial resentment" it's because I'm not a libertarian individualist.

Do you see how the game is played???
10/
The questions test for whether or not you think the outcomes are the result of individual behavior or the result of discrimination and slavery. If you say the outcomes are the result of individual behavior they use that as evidence of "racial resentment."
11/
That's the trick:
If you blame behavior and not discrimination you must have racial resentment
It's not that you're a Rugged individualist
It's not that you think America has made huge strides
It's not that you think people can only control themselves and should make it work
12/
This is of course, nonsense and I say this as a Canadian who supports locally funded single payer healthcare and a strong social support system.

It's not that I agree with libertarians or rugged individualists (I don't) it's that I know those beliefs are not...
13/
the product of "racial resentment." Those beliefs are about worldview and how you think individuals and society ought to interact, not race.
But the trick the authors of the study pull is to use those beliefs as a proxy for racial resentment.

This is nonsense.
14/
The study assumes that individualist accounts of societal outcomes, which is what conservatives use, are evidence of racial resentment. Then using that assumption the study finds, low and behold, white evangelicals (a conservative demographic) have "racial resentment."
15/
Then they publish this nonsense, and then tout their claim that white evangelicals have racial resentment without telling people about the definitions, assumptions, and questions that were to come to that conclusion.

This is laundering ideology under the guise of research.
16/
Then they put finding in tweets like the one shown here. It's dishonest.

(no, putting the questions in a follow up tweet without ever explaining how the questions asked back up the conclusion found is not transparency).
17/
A LOT of social research does stuff like this. So please be aware of it as you use peer reviewed research. Always check the definitions and reasoning so you can see how they achieved their results, don't just skip to the conclusion.

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Apr 19
1/
The ex-CEO of wikimedia, said a free and open internet is a "White Male westernized construct." Now She's CEO of NPR and is paid with your tax dollars to decide what information people see on NPR.

Woke activists hijacked every government institution.

Let's talk about how🧵
2/
The first thing to realize is that this is not a isolated case. Let's look at some examples:

Kelisa Wing was a Pentagon official in charge of DEIn for the Defense Department’s schools. She gets paid to brainwash people with DEI while taking sarcastic shots at white people.
Image
Image
3/
The Center for Disease Control decided to make *Health Equity* core to its mission, they say that means advocating for:

-Free internet access
-Free access to bikes
-Policy changes in housing

They're advocating for woke policy using taxpayer funded government institutions Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 26
1/
@realchrisrufo is 100% correct.

The incentive structure of the online attention economy is optimized for conflict. As such, there is no way for a purely online movement to obtain the stability required for long term political success.

We need a new way forward...
2/
We need is a method of conflict resolution that allows us to settle disputes and also disincentivizing conflict as a strategy for engagement.

I suggest the creation of an online conservative journal, centered on online discourse, that allows factions to argue their case...
3/
The best articles about various disputes, coming from different views, could be collected and published together.

If the journal became high prestige it would incentivize excellent writing and argument over engagement farming.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 26
1/
I have seen the New York piece about the @hubermanlab and I want to briefly comment.

I speak here as a Christian FWIW.

The correct way to deal with interpersonal moral failings is not to publish the sin of a man in public as a form of humiliation. That isn't right.
2/
IF someone sins against you then, if it is possible to do so safely, you should go to that person directly. IF they repent, apologize, and change, then you have won the person over and addressed the matter. IF this works, you have won them over, and brought repentance...
3/

As Paul says "If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over."

This is the goal. It is our job to seek repentance and reconciliation...not revenge and humiliation.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 25
The key word to understand when it comes to wokeness is **SUBVERT**

Woke activists destroy what they don't like (truth, facts, the constitution, etc) by SUBVERTING them.

That is, the woke undercut the power and authority of institutions and concepts they don't like.
The goal is never to show that a thing is bad, and idea is wrong, or an institution is not doing it's job. Rather, the goal is to try to obliterate the social and moral authority of the idea, goal concept, etc in order to delegitimize that idea, goal, concept, etc.
What the woke do, and what the dialectical left (including Marxists, neo-Marxists, Critical Theorists, communists, etc) do is to try to win social and political fights by subverting the validity, legitimacy, and authority of any idea they don't like.

This is how they proceed.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 21
1/
I never want to hear another word from this @kkdumez about saving democracy, or cynicism in politics.

The people that she has joined with here, particularly Rick Wilson are the most utterly nihilistic, dishonest, self-interest and Cynical people in all of politics: right or left.

Let's demonstrate this with a few words directly from Rick Wilson

🧵Image
2/
Rick Wilson says, we're in a culture war, and the way to win is not dialogue or discussion: it's through the use of emotion and spectacle.

he says that when someone says they worry about CRT, you don't discuss facts, you say "they're using the N-word"

That's a direct quote👇 Image
3/
Rick Wilson was trained by Lee Atwater (video 1) And it was Lee Atwater who was responsible for the infamous "Willie Horton" ad (video2)

That's who trained Rick Wilson.

And You can see the jaded cynicism of Atwater was absorbed by Rick Wilson in the next video....

Read 13 tweets
Mar 5
1/
"The very people in charge of disseminating education and challenging young minds have completely abandoned that task and are now wholesale focused on promoting this ideology."

@joerogan is right: woke activists hijacked education so they could indoctrinate kids.

A thread🧵
2/
In his book "The Critical Turn in Education" education professor Isaac Gottesman explains how leftist activists brought Marxism into universities and radicalized the field of education in the 70's. They wanted to put Marxism into the foundation of American education.Image
3/
In his book "Teachers as intellectuals" education professor Henry Giroux said his goal was to use Neo-marxism as his framework for how to do education, and that his goal was to use education as a vehicle for leftists social transformation.

He says this explicitly: Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(