I, too, like and respect Murray Rothbard. A very insightful and incredibly productive writer. But again, would he oppose the “Cuties” phenomenon due to something internal to liberalism or external to it?
https://twitter.com/IlanaMercer/status/1306330236066250752
My general point is that liberalism must be rejected at its core and at its source. That is more important than rejecting the *effects* of liberalism.
If you endorse core, original liberalism, but you have a conservatives mentality, then you’re doomed to complaining about the largely inevitable symptoms of your own ideology for the rest of your life.
In saying that we must have a “conservative” population to maintain liberalism—which I’m not sure I agree with—you’re, in fact, saying that you endorse liberalism as a *secondary effect of something else*, and that you don’t endorse liberalism in itself.
To confront the Left, we must oppose the most fundamental precepts of the liberal, humanist virus.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
