Richard Spencer Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
This gem of a video is a full expression of the *backwards* way of thinking that infects all philosophy derived from Plato, including "rational Christians" (like William Lane Craig), who give life to the maxim that Christianity is "Plato for the people."

No, don't worry, I'm not going to engage in one of those "atheist" debates, in which I "own Christians with facts and logic." Those debates amount to two liberals arguing with each other over who's more liberal. To the contrary, it is logic that needs to be owned!
According to Craig, we should be in awe of the fact that "pure mathematics"—which, apparently, originated and exists in the netherworld of forms—just so happens to align with the real world. This must be God's work!
The very evidence that Craig cites outlines how math and logic are *not* pure forms but themselves derive from the world, our experience of it, and our power seeking within it.
You can stand in awe at how Pythagoras discovered that "pure mathematics" miraculously aligns with the sonic consonance of an octave. Or you could stand in awe of what really took place—that mathematics is, in fact, beautiful because it arose through music.
Pythagoras discovered math by being a musician, by seeking to create the most elegant mating call—and all that implies... (Math, too, is "erotic." This should not be taken as a criticism of math!)
There is something to be said for the wisdom of the common man that, while Newtonian physics can be explained to anyone, "String Theory" is so Byzantine that no one—except a priestly caste of eggheads—can make heads or tails of it. This is true!
This folk wisdom demonstrates the degree to which the latest in "pure mathematics"—or critical race theory or deconstructionism or whatever—has been alienated from the real world and now exists as academic masturbation involving symbols and jargon—references with referents.
Our physical experience of the world—and our domination of the world—*preceded* mathematics, which developed as a way of rationalizing this experience. We're amazed that math and the world align because we've overlooked the physical, biological imperative of the "pure" sciences.
Matthew said, "the last shall be first." This came from a parable about equal wages, and has been taken in a social and political sense—the Judeo-Christian rabble being "chosen," and thus usurping their proper superiors.
But "the last shall be first" is the core failing of Platonic (and, yes, Christian) thinking. It takes the *last* thing—the rationalization or "form" of experience—and posits it as the "first" thing. Christians and Platonists are, in this way, truly backwards.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Spencer

Richard Spencer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardBSpencer

Nov 28, 2022
I've noted a right-wing backlash against Fuentes for meeting with Trump. In summary, "You're ruining his reputation!"
I understand this...but it strikes me as deriving largely from jealousy. I don't blame Fuentes for meeting with the rich and powerful. I would certainly do (and have done) the same thing.
The issue is really the promotion on social media of the private turkey dinner. This was done by Milo (and Ye likely at Milo's behest). If you're going to have a tete-a-tete, you've got to keep that stuff secret. Milo turned the event into a media frenzy.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
Yesterday, we learned that the most significant documents Trump held onto in Mar-a-lago relate to Iran's missile systems and China.

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
I don't quite know what to make of the China-related material. But might the Iran documents tell us something about the dynamics at play with regard to Trump, Iran, the Saudis and UAE—and, yes, Russia?
Avoiding any "Russiagate" hysteria, it's safe to say Trump was Moscow's preferred candidate in 2016. Trump returned the love, and, to be fair, much of what he said was reasonable and "realist": Why not get along with Russia? Why aren't NATO countries paying their fair share? etc.
Read 25 tweets
Oct 21, 2022
Steve Bannon has earned the fanatical, irrational support of MAGA, who have no concept of politics or policy outside owning the libs. Lib-owning martyrdom will certainly appeal to them. Four months is a small price to pay for decades-long grift.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
In a way, I'm surprised that Bannon could accomplish this. Back in 2017, he was fired for disrespecting Trump to various journalists and authors, even floating the use of the 25th amendment. (Perhaps he imagined himself taking over MAGA in Trump's place?).
Secondly, the "We Build The Wall" scam was so brazenly criminal, I'm genuinely shocked that anyone would take him seriously afterwards. I should have remembered this certain White infatuation with evangelical preachers, charlatans, and snake-oil salesmen.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 6, 2022
The notion that Elon is sitting on $44 billion in cash is ridiculous. He’ll sell Tesla stock to purchase Twitter, and that stock is crashing as a result. It’s a vicious cycle, which, in a worst case scenario, eventuates in Musk losing his stake in the Tesla.
Currently, Elon’s 17% of Tesla is worth $128 billion dollars. But again, selling large chunks of this directly lowers the overall value, creating a cascade effect: The price keeps going down, forcing Elon to sell more shares.
Conservative and “New Right” Musk fanboys are hilarious. First, they announced that Elon was saving free speech; then they claimed that Elon was fake-purchasing Twitter to expose it or secretly destroy it. What do they say now?
Read 4 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
In the weeks leading up to the 2020 election, Tim Pool made some rather remarkable predictions.

My point is not to dunk on a person who's clearly dumb, or call Pool a "grifter." What's most important is that Pool paid no real price, in terms of his audience's reaction, to his idiotic claims. In fact, his audience still loves him and treats him like a brave truth-teller.
Pool has an arrangement (or business model) with his audience: he boldly tells them nonsense, or at least misrepresents reports on current event. His audience gets good vibes and pays him for what is effectively entertainment.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 6, 2022
#AlexJones dug his own grave. He can’t whine about the 1A when he actively ignored and defaulted in the trial where that was very much at stake.
A plausible, if not necessarily winning, defense could have been attempted based on the *Snyder v. Phelps* decision, in which SCOTUS upheld the Westboro Baptist Church’s right to demean the memory of fallen soldiers at their own funerals (!)—provided it was political speech.
Jones could have plausibly said that he was not engaged in harassment of individuals; he engaged in political speech against “the globalists” or some such; he got the facts wrong but not maliciously so. (I don’t say this as an admirer of Jones; I say it to be fair.)
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(