Karl Dierenbach Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Here are more thoughts regarding the possibility of a Covid floor in Colorado. First, as a reminder, both positivity and hospitalizations seem to have found a steady-state floor and have been at the same levels for weeks.

STEADY-STATE LEVELS ARE NOT NATURAL!

1/8
Here's a chart showing last 10 years of visits for Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) in US. What's missing? Aside from perhaps mid-July to mid-Aug summer nadir, there are no steady-state periods where ILI visits remain unchanged for weeks. Such balance doesn’t occur naturally.

2/8
And it makes sense, either the flu is spreading or contracting. To strike a perfect balance where there are a steady-state significant number of cases week over week would be very difficult. Even Colorado’s modeling group agrees.

3/8
Go to CO model & try to produce an output w/multiple weeks of steady-state hospitalizations. You can do it, but if you move any parameter by even 1%, you'll change hospitalizations to either increasing or decreasing.

4/8

cucovid19.shinyapps.io/colorado/
To achieve a steady state in an actual population with varying lockdown levels, behaviors, weather, protests, events, lockdown fatigue, etc. would be incredibly hard to accomplish (i.e., impossible).

Look at Sweden’s Intensive Care graph for a more natural curve.

5/8
So theory is we aren't seeing true representation of Covid in a steady state condition in CO. We're seeing an artificial steady state, likely due to false positives, true positives not hospitalized "for" Covid, and/or some other artificial force.

6/8

Colorado’s COVID-19 Modeling Group advising @GovofCO believes a return to January-like behavior would result in 55,000 more Covid deaths (~10,000 per million, 6x worse than NY-the worst place on Earth). The data & real-world examples of more open places (FL, Sweden) disagree.
7/8
If floors remain stable, it’s a sure sign what we are seeing in hospitalizations and positivity in Colorado is not pure Covid cases, but some other phenomenon.

Conclusion: To @GovofCO - Covid isn't the threat you and your modeling group think it is. It's time to open up.

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karl Dierenbach

Karl Dierenbach Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Dierenbach

Feb 8
Actions on Jan 6 were not an insurrection as the word was defined in 1860 around the time of the passing of the 14th amendment.

Trump is not an insurrectionist.

🧵 Image
The definition describes taking over of a city or state such that law cannot be executed. It doesn't say the opposition of "a" law, but law in general.Image
An insurrection is where a group seeks to replace a governing authority w/their own. On Jan 6, a few people sought to change how one particular law was being executed.

It's equivalent to a violent mob attacking a police station b/c they want particular police policies to change.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
Are more people than ever “dying suddenly” since 2021? It appears the answer is yes.

In 2022, after Covid fear and restrictions had subsided, the US hit a record for % of deaths occurring away from healthcare facilities. In 2023, we are on pace to set another record.
🧵 Image
Each US death certificate records 1 of 8 places of death. This chart shows the share for each place category in 2019. The category most sensitive to changes in number of people dying suddenly is likely the “Other” category which is deaths away from home/healthcare facilities. Image
Note: Percent of deaths listed as “Decedent’s Home” has been growing for decades and was massively affected by Covid policies making a post-Covid increase difficult to discern. This analysis looks only at “Other”. The excess deaths at home over trend is about 100,000 since 2020. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
Add to the list: masks contribute to long Covid symptoms.

When the idea of masking started, it was recognized that, at best, it was a tool to slow the spread. It couldn't stop Covid, but it could help flatten the curve was the theory.

Then politicians...
conservativereview.com/horowitz-long-…
...got involved and soon masks were treated as being able to STOP Covid. The CDC director at the time said masks were better than a vaccine (fact check: correct, but not because masks have any efficacy). Many said if we would just mask for a few weeks, Covid would disappear. Image
Parents claimed in court cases that an unmasked school was so unsafe for their asthma-suffering kids, they could not physically walk into such a school (some claimed under fear of death) under the ADA, but a masked school was perfectly safe and the courts went along with it.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
Pull Forward Effect (PFE) primer
A long 🧵

PFE showed up briefly then disappeared, indicating a HUGE number of people are dying from our reaction to Covid.

Here's the CDC graph of US weekly deaths since Jan 2018.
Green=Non-Covid
Blue=Covid
Orange line is expected average.
It is well documented that Covid has hit the elderly and infirmed the hardest. So when a wave of Covid sweeps through a population, it stands to reason that among the victims will be many people who were weak and were going to die shortly absent Covid.
Thus after a wave of Covid, we should see a period of below average mortality as many of the deaths of people who were going to die after the waves were “pulled forward” into the wave.
Read 20 tweets
Sep 28, 2022
I would like to know what Children’s hospital is doing with reference to gender surgeries and hormone treatments on children.

Because from what I see on their website, it isn’t good.

I honestly hope @ChildrensColo can somehow explain how this is not what it appears to be.
First, they seem to be engaging in breast surgery that is classified as “adolescent gender affirmation surgery”.

Is Children’s engaged in the removal of healthy breasts from adolescent females who think they’re boys?

From Children’s website:
Second, Children’s has a fertility preservation program. And one of the reasons listed as to why one would need such a service is “Gender dysphoria”.

This implies someone is treating gender dysphoria in such a manner that fertility is lost.
Read 13 tweets
Sep 27, 2022
Aww, Jared Polis DM'd me today. He wants me to join his team and told me 5 things he's proud of. Let's go through them. Image
Nothing is free. We all pay including all of the families without kids in kindergarten.

Also, why? Why not "free" pre-K? Why not "free" daycare? My point is, why expand it? The only reason is to buy votes and increase the state's grip on your kids. Image
Colorado has the most radical abortion laws on the planet. Any reason, and time.

Most states and most of Europe is far more restrictive.

People travel to Colorado so they can kill their late-term viable babies. And we are happy to oblige. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(