Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
@ProfMJCleveland
Sep 17, 2020 • 4 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
Thanks! This makes a great point. SO: Did Biden have this conversation? What do OUR transcripts show???
I'm doing a deep dive on this issue, but an initial thought: Here is DNI on these tapes. NOTE: They don't call them fake or altered but "leaked."
And on other tapes Biden's team hasn't denied he said what was on the tape, but pulled the Planned Parenthood "defense" of "heavily edited." washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
So far, then, this tapes do not appear to be "disinformation."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 15
🚨Update on Columbia Hamas advocate Khalil's Motion for Release pursuant to Mapp, filed early this morning. 1/
2/ Here's the full filing: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ There are several reasons why the Motion should be denied, first being that there is no habeas petition properly pending before the court because habeas jurisdiction exists only in district where Defendant is physically present & he is not present in S.D. New York.
Read 7 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 15
🚨THREAD: Earlier this week Judge Ali (judge who ordered Trump to pay some $2 billion in contracts w/i 36 hours to have that order stayed by Roberts & then told by court to be more clear on who to pay & reasonable on time), entered a preliminary injunction as noted below.1/
2/ At time, I said order was confusing & in part merely ordered Trump to comply with law, but nonetheless said I expected immediate appeal. Well, gov't has filed status report saying still deciding on whether to immediately appeal and/or seek stay. Why? B/c they don't
3/ read order as really tying their hands. As status report explains, they are reviewing and paying for past work and since they would be doing that any way, absent court enter a pay now order, Trump can just plod ahead.
Read 10 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 14
🚨🚨🚨💣BREAKING: Fourth Circuit grants Trump Administration stay. Image
Image
Image
2/ This was case Court held hearing on earlier today about the DEI clause in contracts. So will they need to execute contracts as is?storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Here's the underlying background.
Read 4 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 14
🔥Hearing to start at 3 on claims by Plaintiffs of widespread violation of injunction barring DEI EO. 1/ Image
2/ Case: courtlistener.com/docket/6960784…
3/ Hearing beginning: Noting merely a scheduling conference and not an evidentiary hearing so sounds like he's trying to get handle on it. Asking for 3 things:
1) Baltimore has received notice to certify non-DEI in gov' contract which claims is in violation of order; 2) seek compliance plan b/c systemic failure & idea of how to get to compliance b/c people are suffering; not sure what #3 is. Judge says don't get into now--what do you want. Baltimore wants ruling today; compliance & remediation do a briefing as court asks.
Read 9 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 14
🚨🚨🚨OMGosh...TDS is making judges ignore diff. b/w "restraining order" to maintain status quo & an injunction requiring affirmative action? THIS order is NOT a "restraining order": It is an injunction masquerading as a TRO which makes it immediately appealable. 1/ Image
2/ This case is the second one on probationary employees, with this order actually requiring reinstatement. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Yesterday's reporting that court ordered reinstatement is possibly inaccurate as the only written order extended TRO which didn't order reinstatement. Not sure if oral order did, but government said court entered Preliminary Injunction. THREADS on that:
Read 8 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 14
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: More details in Khalil case just filed. 1/
2/ Here's letter. Comments to follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ So Khalikl wants to immediate do briefing on his "Mapp" motion while government says, no first decide if you have jurisdiction. Image
Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(