Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Happy Constitution Day! Enjoy the blessings of liberty! ❤️🇺🇸
A series of pics for the day. Debating:
Independence Hall. Philadelphia.
The rising sun chair Washington sat in to preside over the convention. You can see it in Independence Hall in Philadelphia.
George Washington. Father of our country. He gave up power after two terms, saying: “I did not defeat George III to become King George I.” George III in response said: “If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.”
Thomas Jefferson. He called the convention “an assembly of demi-gods.” He was serving at the time as our Ambassador to France.
James Madison. 4th US President. Called the “Father of the Constitution” for his significant role in the drafting of it & the Bill of Rights, & for promoting ratification of the Constitution by the states.
John Marshall. 4th Supreme Court Chief Justice. A Virginia delegate to the convention, he was also instrumental in having Virginia ratify the constitution.
Ben Franklin. The oldest delegate, he urged all to consider carefully others views. On the last day he was ill, but his speech was read including this line: “Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best.”
Alexander Hamilton. A tireless advocate for the Constitution, he was a delegate from New York. He was a principal author of “The Federalist Papers,” a series of articles explaining the Constitution to the people & urging ratification.
Gouverneur Morris. An often overlooked Founder, he wrote the beautiful Preamble to the Constitution. His other stylist changes made the document readable & flowing.
These were just men w/flaws & failings. But they fought for & created a system in which people rule themselves instead of being ruled by a despot who can beggar or kill anyone. These men were geniuses & heros. W/o them, especially Washington only the Almighty knows where we’d be.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸

Leslie McAdoo Gordon 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @McAdooGordon

Apr 26
Now that we all know what DEI is, I want to talk to the Right of Center about reclaiming the correct meaning of “equity.”

Equity is a legal word. It is contrasted with “law” in legal understanding.
The English common law developed the concept of “equity” as a means of avoiding the harsh and unjust outcomes that a strict application of “the law” sometimes produces.
This would be stuff like a lease where a couple made all payments except the last one was one day late because the husband died & the widow could not access to their account for a few days and the landlord would foreclose on the entire property. Technically allowed; still BS.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 26
Bribery has always been private conduct.

Ruling impartially on a case is a judge’s official duty. Taking money to rule for one side is not. But notice that the judge doesn’t benefit from the ruling, but from the bribe. Same for public officials.
Similarly, where a public official does benefit directly and personally from their own official act, esp if that is not disclosed, we’ve deemed that a conflict of interest, which is also private conduct that invalidates the public act.
These private acts are entirely different from cases where a govt official receives no personal financial benefit but gets an indirect non-monetary benefit - popularity, future votes, legacy - and (like everyone else) may benefit from the substantive official act (eg tax cuts.)
Read 9 tweets
Apr 25
DJT SCOTUS case on immunity starting now.

Sauer arguing for DJT. Doing his opening statement now.
He's making the point that prosecuting POTUS after office undermines the POTUS while POTUS.
Thomas - source of immunity? Sauer - vesting clause.

Thomas - how?
Read 141 tweets
Apr 21
The test for whether spoken words are free speech or not is called the Brandenburg test from a SCOTUS case in 1969. It is also called the "imminent lawless action" test. ONLY if the speech rises to that level does it fall outside of the protection of the First Amendment.
In essence the speech must be the kind that does or inexorably is known to lead to "imminent disorder." (This standard is from another SCOTUS case in 1973, Hess.)

This is a very high bar & effectively renders almost all speech that doesn't actually result in violence, protected.
The "speech" in Brandenburg took place at a KKK rally, disparaged Blacks & Jews, suggested "revengance" should be had against the Congress for "suppressing" whites, & explained there would be a "march on Congress" on July 4th of 400,000, followed by marches in FL & MS.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 16
Listening to Fischer argument now. Govt arguing 2nd.

Sounds to me like the 3 liberal justices are in favor of the govt‘s position.

So far, I have 3 of the conservatives in favor of Fischer - Chief Roberts, Alito & Thomas.

Not sure yet on Barrett, Gorsuch & Kavanaugh.
Robert’s really arguing with the SG - that doesn’t usually happen.
Gorsuch is definitely for Fischer. He’s scorching the SG.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 13
Understand reality:

The US govt needs to & is going to spy on foreigners overseas & also here, in our security defense.

FISA or no FISA, that will happen.

The only questions are who “gate keeps” it & how & what the standards are & whether the standards differ inside the US.
There is no question in my mind, at all, that the federal govt has unlimited power to spy on foreigners overseas for our national security intelligence purposes.

None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Domestic spying- of foreigners here & of US persons here & abroad- present different issues.
And there is an age old problem of whether/if/when/how information obtained from intelligence can be used in the criminal process.

These issues must be debated vigorously & our rights as US persons jealousy guarded.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(