A wee story about my attitude to court reporting.
1
The very first case I covered was in 2010, the perjury trial of Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan, and for the whole first week, not knowing any better I just wrote down exactly what happened (the judge came in, this guy said that etc, etc)
2
On the Friday of that week I added a comment about how sad it was that it had come to this, what a tragedy it was.
Then I went to the pub to decompress a little with the other reporters.
3
In the pub an older reporter came up to me, he was a little "tipsy,"' and said he had liked my stuff up until the Friday, but didn't like today's report, I asked why?
4
He replied "Because no-one gives a f*ck what you think, just tell us what happened."
Best bit of advice I ever got. #Ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why did the Sun/News of the world hack William and Harry so much?
A thread.
Royal news and gossip was a staple of their output, but their problem was that, in 2006/2010 the younger members of the family, who the public was most interested wouldn't cooperate, as they blamed the press for Diana's death
Their Royal reporters were also mostly middle aged men in suits, they wouldn't exactly blend in at the London nightspots the young set hung out at
Counsel now going over emails sent to the Mail on Sunday to Harry's solicitors asking if they wanted to "comment or guide," them on their planned article.
Counsel, Harry had only made the offer to pay when the judicial review was already in progress.
Says "That's the basis of what the criticism [in the article] was about
Back at court (by video link) for a motions hearing in the case of Prince Harry v Associated Newspapers.
Not sure what I'll be able to report, but will let you all know what I can.