OK, buckle up, kiddos—here's a 🧵 on our new Geology paper about the enigmatic tesserae on #Venus, and what our new results mean for our understanding of the Hell Planet
First off: what *are* the tesserae (sing. "tessera")?
In short: dunno! Ha.
The longer answer is that they're very heavily tectonically deformed rocks, and where they're found they're the oldest things around: everything else is on top of them.
Here's what they look like:
Lots of work has focused on the tesserae since they were discovered in the 1980s (and named by Russian scientists for parquet flooring!).
We've found lines in several tessera units that curve in such a way that they seem to follow topography. And that's a bit... unexpected.
In the figure above, you can see bright lines on this radar image that curve (marked by gold arrows).
Here's another view, with the lines sketched out in teal (centre) and shown with topography (right).
Radar-dark smooth stuff is shown by blue arrows. (We'll come back to this.)
So why are these lines of interest?
Well, they look *a lot* like the lines you get in the landscape when (near-)horizontal lines are exposed by erosion.
Check out this image of the limestone Burren in Co. Clare, Ireland...
...or this one, showing exposed layers of stacks of lava in the East African Rift:
So, it sure seems that the curving lines we're seeing in the tesserae look a lot like layers of some rock type that's been exposed by erosion, at least in part.
That's consistent with them being stacks of lava, say; compare these lines with those of lava traps in Siberia (top):
But what's doing the erosion?
Probably wind—but perhaps not wind on its.
We *do* know there's wind on Venus, for several reasons, including the fact that we saw particles move over the course of an hour after the Venera 13 lander touched down in 1982:
That said, wind probably isn't enough to make the ridges and valleys that characterize the tesserae.
But you know what could? Folding.
And there are shapes in the tesserae that look a bit like eroded folds; they're marked in these images with purple arrows:
The example in the lower half of that figure is from Earth, from the Sulaiman Mountains in Pakistan; this is an oblique view from Google Earth, and the distinctive lenticular (eye-shaped) patterns here result from the folding and then erosion of layered rocks:
So what can we say about the tesserae, or at least those parts that show these curving lines that follow topography?
We think that these rocks must be layered (top), and are then, at some point, folded, for some reason (middle). *Then* those folded layers are eroded (bottom):
And remember that radar-dark stuff? One of the reasons something is dark on radar imagery is because it's smooth (at the wavelength of the radar beam).
Maybe that dark stuff isn't lava, as is often assumed, but the stuff eroded off the tesserae ridges!
One thing I haven't talked about yet is what the rocks that make up the tesserae actually *are*... and that's because we don't know.
Maybe they're layers of lava, like our example from Siberia! That would make sense—Venus is COVERED in lava. They might even look like this...
There's one other possibility: maybe these layered tesserae are sedimentary—sandstone, say, or even evaporites.
So what? They're super common rocks!
Yes, but they can't form on Venus *today*. Which means, if they are sedimentary... they're from an older climate period.
The point is, although we now know more about these ancient and weird rocks, we still don't know some fairly fundamental things, like what they're made of.
But we *could* figure that out, if we got close to or even landed on the tesserae. For which, friends, we need a mission!
Another stunning example of gravitational lensing in deep space revealed by #JWST.
And there is a single Milky Way star in this image.
Everything else is a galaxy.
This view from @NASAWebb @ESA_Webb shows galaxy cluster PLCK G165.7+67.0 (also called G165), an enormous gravitational mass about 3.6 *billion* lightyears away that's so big it's bent the light of yet more distant objects behind it.
@NASAWebb @ESA_Webb In particular, the orangey band at lower-left of the central cluster contains three brighter points of light that are in fact the *same* Type Ia supernova "H0pe", imaged thrice and enabling scientists to gain a better insight into the expansion rate of the Universe.
Friends, a few weeks ago I told you about something called Phantom—the Venus balloon mission concept I've been leading since January.
In July, we successfully flight-tested a subscale prototype of our balloon in the Nevada desert.
Now we've a video of those tests.
Take a look.
This video documents just a tiny bit of the *enormous* amount of work folks have put into developing these balloons—much of that work predating my joining the mission concept team.
Importantly, these tests validate the technologies we hope to propose to NASA for eventual flight.
You might remember, in my recent thread, that we might not even have the chance of proposing our mission concept to NASA in the next competition round.
That's something we're working hard on to fix.
But now, for the first time, we know we can fly a variable-altitude balloon.
NASA's #ParkerSolarProbe was able to image the surface of #Venus from space in a way we didn't think possible before!
Here, we can see the Aphrodite Terra highland *glowing* through the clouds (left), exactly where radar data tell us it should be (right)!
Venus' thick cloud layer obscures the surface from space at visible wavelengths—but there are some "windows" at near-infrared wavelengths where cameras can see through to the surface.
PSP took these images at a wavelength not thought to be able to penetrate the clouds before.
This matters because, unlike Mars, Mercury, the Moon, etc, we can't easily see the Venus surface—we have to use radar.
But if we can "see" the surface in the near infrared, we can start to learn things about what it's made of. And thus we can learn new things about Venus.
A quick 🧵 about the *size* of the #HungaTonga eruption:
Volcanic eruptions are generally assigned a VEI—Volcanic Explosivity Index—value.
This scale is a general indicator of the explosive character of an eruptive event.
1/
This scale, described by Christopher Newhall and Stephen Self in a 1982 paper, is a general indicator of the explosive character of an eruptive event, and reflects the interplay of an eruption's magnitude, intensity, and energy release rate.
2/
The VEI rating scale employs a set of criteria including ejecta volume, style of eruption, plume height, and injection of gases into the troposphere and stratosphere.
There's no question that the #Tongaeruption was huge—it absolutely was.
3/
I need you to know I'm being completely serious here.
We have no idea what's inside Uranus.
We really don't have a clue what's inside this or there other "ice giant", Neptune.
It's possible that there's a rocky interior, perhaps at least as large as Earth. There might be a water–ammonia ocean above that rocky centre, topped with a thick atmosphere.
But we don't know.
Uranus and Neptune are the outer Solar System's Venus -- fascinating, largely unexplained, but to be honest pretty much ignored in the modern era of planetary exploration.
The Solar System is *full* of incredible and fascinating worlds!
Mercury.
Venus.
Earth.
The Moon.
Jupiter.
Saturn.
Uranus and Neptune.
Ceres, Vesta, and the other main asteroid belt bodies.
The myriad other minor bodies scattered across the System.
Every one of them amazing! 🥰
People are pointing out that I forgot somewhere important!
Somewhere that fascinates everyone, that we need to explore more, that holds a special place in our heart.