Everyone gets to decide how to heal from their trauma. a counter voice was presented in @educationweek-no shade on that
@educationweek has not removed the article of Julie. Julie showed who she was- she moved on to defending TJ’s admission policy that excluded Black applicants
That’s right... Julie went from mocking a Black educator, being amplified by @educationweek on saying leave your life mattering at home, to siding with those defending a TJHS applicant process that produced no Black applicants this year
Meanwhile, as a direct result of my inability stay silent, I am now being targeted by the anti-w*ke (have to star it to prevent more) army whose views would be embraced by guess who (can’t say it because I’ll be targeted)
Here’s the reality:
Had @educationweek not published Julie’s piece, that wouldn’t have happened. I would not be under fire for comments I made in response to @educationweek
I take accountability for my comments- I wonder if @educationweek can take accountability promoting, getting traffic, and profiting from the piece
The direct result @educationweek of you publishing this "diversity of voice" is those who come to speak out will INEVITABLY AND PREDICTABLY come under fire. They still have it up ready to create additional harm
And we have no choice but to speak up because it directly impacts us when we are silent it creates more harm
And it’s so normalized that @educationweek watches it happen and doesn’t feel an apology is even owed or action needs to be done on their part.
We have seen women of color and allies take a stand
We’ve seen Julie’s stand
When does @educationweek week take a stand as an institution and repair the harm... Tell me if I missed that
I could have missed it because my mentions may have been taken over by the anti-w**e calling me stupid and everything but a child of God on repeat and trying to erode me so let me know @educationweek
I say this to say @educationweek decision to publish Julie and my decision to speak out has created real consequences for me. I am willing to accept that.
Consequences are harassment that isnormalized as acceptable because I'm believed to be invincible
I'm not saying I'm a victim here but I'm the collateral damage
And I’m tired of @educationweek stepping over that like it doesn’t matter and thinking they have repaired it when it hasn’t been repaired for me- I accept it may have been repaired for others but not for me
So I’m glad others got a platform to tell their story and again no shade but until @educationweek decides to disassociate with and stop receiving traffic from and profiting off of clicks from Julie, I cannot support them. And clearly my support is not needed for them to continue
I refuse to give @educationweek any traffic until they take down Julie’s piece that harmed so many
Which is unfortunate because I would have loved to read the thoughts published today but I refuse to give @educationweek any traffic while the continue to benefit off of Julie
By take accountability I mean I accept there are consequences that follow from my comments
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Those stories about kids getting a million in scholarships or a ton of scholarships are actually an indication of inequity
A small % of students get all the big scholarships and others will get little to nothing
I see it all the time. One student getting SIGNIFICANTLY MORE than what they need- I’ve had students get $$$,$$$ or $$,$$$ in excess because we apply for anything and everything
Other students, im talking over 4.0 gpa, getting nothing. Like $0 or low amounts
Scholarships tend to pick the same bright star over and over
And no shade to the bright star but it’s frustrating because when that student decides on a school and foregoes the scholarships we rarely see redistribution of the scholarship
@balderdashHere4@DeeSTEM_Teach@RachelLitLady1@MoniseLSeward Lets reframe away from irresponsible. I went to law school and have significantly more debt than this. Everyone believed giving me at 23 debt that would take 20-25 years to pay off was responsible
People encouraged it. You’ll pay it all back quickly they said
@balderdashHere4@DeeSTEM_Teach@RachelLitLady1@MoniseLSeward It’s actually almost impossible to graduate undergrad now with less than 100k yet the colleges throwing students into debt have millions if not billions in endowment and spend millions marketing to students saying it’s worth it.
And I’m not talking we want you to score around in the range of
I am talking there are colleges I’ve seen tell a student to retake the ACT because they were 1-2 points off or the score was a 1180 and they want 1200. Students who are NCAA eligible but go until score met
To be clear not everyone does this. I’ve had coaches say “close enough” and I had coaches ask “you think (athlete) is academically ready, worried about the score” and had them realize this score isn’t a reflection of their academic ability
4. Then tell students reviewing with and without certain scores is normal- some schools have test others don’t, some people have AP, others IB, others have standardize scores 5. Tell students some students have some classes others don’t, some students have opportunities
2/
6. Essentially explain there is not this “if all things are equal” and “a student who has the higher score will get the slot” 7. Explain how test were used and how that’s change 8. Explain this is not out of pity for certain students
3/
I have students deciding how much to pay for undergraduate, where to go, and whether it’s worth it to go to a more prestigious school to better chances of med school
I only know hidden cost of law school (bar exam, living expenses)