The removal of Paytm and Paytm First Games from the Google Play Store covers two interesting #techpolicy issues:
1. Platform Power: Google and Apple have an operating system duopoly. Remember that you can't upload an app store app on the Google Play Store. Thus
(1/n)
They have the power of the default. It's also an app store duopoly. They leverage this duopoly to control entire ecosystems, and effectively control the app economy of a country. The TRAI Chairman @rssharma has spoken about "platform neutrality". Can they ban apps from
(2/n)
their platform, without repercussions? Of course they can, as a pvt platform. They don't want to enable realmoney gaming & gambling? That's their prerogative. But there's a challenge when apps don't have any other significant options.
2. Realmoney gaming: This is where it
(3/n)
becomes tricky. Games of skill are allowed, but games of chance are not. The popularity of the IPL has spawned realmoney gaming services, which position themselves as games of skill. Back in 2009, 6UP (IPL related), was banned medianama.com/2009/05/223-if…
(4/n)
Are fantasy sports games actual games of skill? That is debatable. What isn't is the fact that when real money is involved, Google can take action. There have been several calls for allowing games of skill and gambling even.
(5/n)
In fact, @ShashiTharoor even had a Pvt Members bill for regulation of online sports betting and gaming, called
What I've understood after some chats: 1. Realmoney games are not allowed on play store despite games of skill being legal in India. That's not right. 2. IMP: Surrogate advertising for realmoney games is not allowed. If Paytm promotes Paytm first games, that's surrogate. Banned.
3. If Times group apps promote MPL, because it's an investor, banned. 4. If Times group apps promote Paytm first game, allowed. If Paytm promotes mpl, allowed.
Google's play story policies are a mess. They need to fix this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's unpack this: 1. On media lashing out: perplexity basically takes content from news companies, repurposes them (with citations), and essentially hides links behind a drop-down, giving a user no reason to visit the original source. It adds zero reporting of its own, zero +
Context of its own. It is thus not fair usage. It is probably also not copyright violation since facts cannot be copyrighted, but it definitely is plagiarism. Now if someone was using your output by scraping it, and presenting it as a service to a third party without paying you+
and is effectively stealing the core of your monetization and sustenance (audience and content), why would you not lash out? It is an existential crisis for you. 2. 2 year old startup: if someone is stealing your content, the age of the entity doing that doesn't matter.
+
So #TelecomBill is being unexpectedly tabled in Parliament today. There was discontent abt treating several online services as telecom services. Telcos liked it: they’ve argued that online services = telecom services & should be treated as same.
Some things to look out for:
1/n
1. Are online services all telecom? Will the definition of “telecommunications” go beyond telecom operator services and include online, like broadcast, cloud, email, video, data communications etc? Remember that the Broadcast Bill from Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
2/n
is a mechanism for them to retain jurisdiction over this regulatory land-grab from telecom ministry. 2. If not other things, will online messaging = telecom? Telcos have argued that there should be same service same rules, even though online messaging and calling are not the
3/n
Multiple opposition MPs (Priyanka Chaturvedi, Shashi Tharoor, Mahua Moitra, Pawan Khera +) have disclosed that they received messages from Apple about state sponsored attackers compromising their Apple devices. We will probably hear about more MPs soon. A few things:
1/n
1. Sophisticated attacks, multiple vectors: such attacks are virtually impossible to guard against, because they could get you to click on a link via any medium: email, sms, WhatsApp message etc. It could be a message posing as a credit card statement, ecommerce package
2/n
delivery link, anything. It's social engineering. It could happen to anyone.
2. Android vs Apple: a cybersecurity expert I know said that it's likely that we won't know about Android devices being compromised in a similar manner. How does Apple know it's a state
3/n
It's 2023 and I'm not sure if anyone cares for #netneutrality in India anymore, but Jio, Vi and Airtel are coming for it.
Don't take my word for it. Here are excerpts from their submissions to @TRAI (uploaded last night) :
Jio wants Internet companies to "contribute" towards telecom network costs, based on volume of traffic, turnover threshold, number of users etc. Basically, apps should pay telcos because users want to use an app.
On by the way, guess what...
Airtel wants this too. They want this to be traffic based, so only large startups will be impacted. It's not just them...
India's Data Protection Bill is set to
be released soon, maybe even tomorrow or Friday. I thought I'd make a list of things to keep an eye out for, in terms of how the bill deals with them. A thread on what to look for in the Bill:
#DataProtectionBill #India
1/n
1. Look for "Deemed Consent" in the bill: Can someone take your data without your permission or even knowing...train facial recognition tools using your social media photos? Critical when you look at training AI datasets. Probably one of the most 2/n #dataprotectionbill
problematic parts of the bill. 2. Right to information & erasure: Shouldn't you have the right to know what all data big tech firms like Google, Facebook, Paytm, Reliance Jio, Flipkart, Ola have on you? Shouldn't you be allowed to delete it? 3. Purpose limitation: Shouldn't
3/n
My recommendation to journalists interested in tech policy is to always attend government consultations, especially TRAI ones. I've learned so much from them.
Attended my first in 2006. Didn't speak at one for years (because I wasn't confident about my knowledge of the...
domain). There was one on VAS in Bangalore where I first spoke because the person there from Voda was misrepresenting something. A TRAI person came over to me after the session and thanked me, and said I should participate more.
Yesterdays was the first that I attended after...
... a few years. The last that I remember attending virtually was on Net Neutrality. Physical was on Telecom Pricing. Since then, people from my team have.
Yesterday was reminder that I should attend more TRAI open houses. What's great abt them is that they are open: anyone...