Advocates Suneita Ojha and Kritika Gupta to moderate the session.
Session begins.
Moderators welcome the speakers and the participants.
Here, we discuss topics important to female lawyers: Gupta
Our Law Minister was asked about representation of women judges. He said there are 80 women judges from a total of over 1100 judges. Similar is the case with Senior designations: Gupta
The representation of women in law entrance is however increasing: Gupta
Our three distinguished speakers need no introduction: Ojha
Ojha introduces Senior Adv Luthra, adv Gosain.
Ojha introduces Bhalla from SAM & Co.
We have three people from three areas of litigation. Their combined experience crosses a century: Ojha
Senior Adv Geeta Luthra begins her address.
Being a lawyer is dream that I started dreaming when I was 7 years ago. I used to cut out the news articles on my father: Luthra
My strongest opposition came in its own way. My father had not seen female Lawyer. He saw his academician daughter and wanted me to be write the IAS: Luthra
My sister became a surgeon when a lot of women were not lawyers. It is only possible with the support of family: Luthra
I was not so happy about public speaking. I had teh determination to try and do it (debates). My father used to come and watch me play hockey: Luthra
Law for me is fighting for teh underdog. The person who cannot have a voice to speak should be given a voice: Luthra
This is my opening remark: Luthra
Adv Gosain begins her opening remark.
I was born as a person who loved nature but I had no decisive dream. When I did my graduation, people became teachers. I thought let me be an air hostess: Gosain
I didn't inform my family. When my father got to know, I still remember the lecture I got. I was always a debator: Gosain
Is this all your thinking?, he said. He was furious. He tore my letter: Gosain
I told him I wanted to earn money. He told me to do law : Gosain
He handed me tickets to the movie Paper Chase.. : Gosain
We are four sisters. All our professionally qualified.. it was an accidental entry, influenced by my father: Gosain
When I entered the High Court, I fell in love. In 1976, the High Court building was inaugurated. I joined in 1978. There were very few women. They were so supportive. We were always huddled: Gosain
It was a very challenging entry for us but never did it feel that we were a minority. I thanked my father.: Gosain
Everyone supported each other. All women from my batch are good well. Don't go by numbers. Women started entering legal education much later. Things have changed: Gosain
Chose litigation or corporate as per your temperament. Be true to whatever you choose. Always tell yourself that you are here to say: Gosain
Ritu Bhalla begins her address.
For me, my choices were clear. Either armed forces or law. I wanted to be in a combative forces but it was not an option then. Law was a natural choice: Bhalla
There is no story of challenge for me to tell : Bhalla
Bhalla tells the story of one of the first Indian women Advocates.
The Act which did not allow women to join the Bar was removed. Personally, I never felt that there was an institutionally sponsored glass ceiling: Bhalla
We had wonderful judges. Gender did not matter, preparedness did: Bhalla
I joined the firm in 1989, a year after in joined tbe Bar: Bhalla
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court takes up suggestions seeking sweeping reforms in SCBA elections, including reservation for members with disabilities, 50% relaxation in eligibility norms, rotational representation for women, and inclusion of gender neutrality and ability inclusion as core objectives of the Bar Association
#SupremeCourt #SCBA #BarReforms
CJI Surya Kant: Please give all the suggestions to Adv Pragya Baghel.
CJI to Adv Sneha Kalita: As a woman member, as an AoR and as someone seeking empowerment.
Sr Adv Vijay Hansaria: Suggestion by Ms Kalita on reservation for differently abled is praiseworthy
CJI: yes we will make sure that and we are under an obligation to create the infrastructure for the same.
Adv Kalita: 76 years has passed and we still do not have a woman present of the Supreme Court Bar
. I am stressing on the point of rotational representation
Another woman lawyer: no no that cannot be. It has to be on merit.
CJI: environment created should not look like one is completely dependant for the post. Everytime one cannot depend on reservation
#THREAD Supreme Court is set to hear today West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s plea raising concerns over the SIR electoral roll revision exercise in the State. @MamataOfficial is scheduled to appear in person. #SupremeCourt #WestBengal
Follow updates here 👇
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee has urged the Supreme Court to issue urgent directions in the SIR process, warning that mandatory hearings, document rejections and use of Micro Observers could lead to large scale voter disenfranchisement #SupremeCourt #SIR @MamataOfficial
@MamataOfficial All eyes on the Supreme Court today as a Bench led by CJI Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi, hears Mamata Banerjee’s plea on the SIR process, with the final electoral roll deadline close at hand. #SupremeCourt #SIR #WestBengal
Supreme Court to shortly resume hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria
#straydogs #SupremeCourt
The court is expected to continue reviewing compliance affidavits filed by various states with respect to its 7th November order relating to removal of stray dogs from institutional areas etc.
Yesterday, the Court took a dim view of “vague” affidavits filed by some states.
Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal: Punjab has not submitted any action plan etc.
Counsel for Punjab: there is a budgetary allocation of 11cr. There are 20 dog catching vehicles available. There is a district level committee which we have formed. We have given a full action plan for institutions.
Court: how many dogs have you collected from institutions?
Counsel: for Malerkotla it is 108. I will place as and when information comes.
Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC)'s recently notified rules intended to prevent caste discrimination in educational institutions #UGC #UGCRegulations #SupremeCourt
The rules have been challenged for excluding 'general category' students from complaining under its grievance redressal mechanism #UGC #UGCRegulations
University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 was notified on January 13 and applies to all higher educational institutions in India.
Its objective is to "eradicate discrimination only on the basis of religion, race, gender, place of birth, caste, or disability, particularly against the members of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, socially and educationally backward classes, economically weaker sections, persons with disabilities, or any of them, and to promote full equity and inclusion amongst the stakeholders in higher education institutions."