Yesterday, the sheriff came out and offered a new version of the killing of #DijonKizzee in which BOTH deputies fired because they had been looking down the barrel of the gun Kizzee raised. Except the video they provided shows him dropping the gun before the 2nd draws his.
I've slowed it down and put the cursor in the area where you can see the gun fall at about 10 seconds in. At this .25 speed, the gap btwn that and 2nd deputy's drawing of his weapon is easier to see. #DijonKizzee@BenCrumpLaw
For reference, this is where the gun landed. It's the bottom blue arrow. The other two point to clothes dropped as he fell.
Yesterday's press conference came just a couple of hours after the call from several members of the Oversight Commission that Sheriff Villanueva resign. latimes.com/california/sto…
Most recently, he has been roundly criticized for not just lying but also proclaiming reporter Josie Huang from KPCC to be bad at her job because her videos of her own arrest contradict his narration of events. laist.com/2020/09/16/deb…
Yesterday's press conference, which I tried live tweeting here, was a masterclass in how to demonize a community while trying to position yourself as its defender
And they kept repeating this new narrative, that not only had Kizzee picked up the gun, but *both* deputies had seen it fall during the struggle and *both* had stared down its barrel when he pointed it at them
recall that for the last three weeks the gun had first been produced, then it was tangled up in the clothing, then Kizzee made a motion toward it. but he had never touched it.
except they weren't. you can see the gun fall in two of the videos they provided. in this shot, the black gun has just skittered into frame at the blue arrow. the first deputy is firing, but the second is just moving into position.
for reference, the gun hasn't hit the ground yet here, a quarter of a second earlier, while Kizzee is upright but still falling.
the time stamps for reference
the gun is seen in that position here in this ABC7 video screenshot of the scene from that same day.
It's visible falling in this video as well, around the 8-9 second mark.
We can also *hear* the delay in the second deputy opening fire in this doorbell cam, which captures the first burst and then, after a pause, a second, which is the second deputy finally getting around the car and joining in.
Just a reminder of how @LACoSheriff described that yesterday... glossing over how quickly the shots were fired to suggest the officers acted with lightning non-Hollywood-like speed to counter a threat
They've had three weeks to pull this narrative together and watch their own videos. But instead, @LACoSheriff
was holding an anti-BLM press conference that he invited an anti-Black Proud Boy enthusiast to speak at.
This (re the 110) is a bit oversimplified. The 110 was constructed as the Black pop. was experiencing rapid growth in South LA (which was still largely white then) and was spilling beyond the borders of redlined zones. It was more about containment/division than displacement. 1/
Where the East LA interchange was actively about "slum clearance" the 110 S. route was contentious b/c it was going to run thru white neighborhoods wherever it was put. Kenneth Hahn & protesters tried to push it much farther east to no avail. newspapers.com/image/68933525…
But the original Figueroa Pkwy plans had it running through the middle of S. LA. And the 110 rte had the added benefit of running alongside redlined zones and containing the rapidly growing Black population to the Eastside.
The LAPPL claims CM Soto-Martinez called for patrols to watch over his Lexus, but even Fox's own story has been corrected to note the CM doesn't own a Lexus & that it was a staffer who made the call about their personal vehicle. But why should police let facts get in the way...?
What about the hypocrisy of targeting someone for a public smear campaign when the evidence indicates they are not the guilty party? Just asking for the public...
On 1/18, Feezy filed a $10M tort claim vs. LASD for the NYE incident where dep. Justin Sabatine put a gun in his face & threatened to blow a hole in his chest. Audio of the threats quickly went viral. But the Sheriff did not respond for nearly a week 🧵: la.streetsblog.org/2023/02/03/any…
When they finally did, the statement was underwhelming, categorizing the threats to Feezy’s life as “unprofessional language” & the displaying/drawing of a weapon. It didn't mention the intimidation Feezy faced at the station or answer any ??s I asked.
LASD also released body cam footage of the incident. Though the detention lasted half an hour, the cam footage is just 4 min long, and only from Sabatine’s camera, which he did not turn on until a min. into the encounter, in violation of LASD policy.
Now @kdeleon is just making sh*t up. He didn't suggest @mhdcd8 take LAX from CD11 to expand the Black middle class there. He didn't want assets taken from CD9 b/c it would likely result in KDL/CD14 losing assets.
Tavis Smiley: My point is that you're not in the room...you're not voting on the issues that matter to your constituents. So when you say that your constituents will be left w/out a voice if you aren't there... You ain't there now.
LAPD's statement that they turned off 🚨/sirens to indicate "they would no longer be attempting to stop the vehicle" as they approached the intersection doesn't make a lot of sense. Nobody being pursued thinks, "phew!" while 🚓 is just 50ft behind you. latimes.com/california/sto…
Sirens are as much a signal to the person being pursued as an indicator to other road users to stop/slow down/move right/get outta the way. This is the moment the signal was turned off. They're both speeding & the first vehicle is probably 3-4 car lengths from the intersection.
Captured on a dashcam as the vehicle being pursued and LAPD speed toward them. LAPD has just turned off their lights in this image.
Saying the car part carried by Petit resembled a "nonfunctioning firearm" was bad enough, but it wasn't the only troubling assertion LAPD made at the hastily called "town hall" on the shooting the other night. la.streetsblog.org/2022/07/29/lap…
To justify the shooting, LAPD is working to anchor the narrative about the threat Petit allegedly posed in the 911 call. To do so, they took the highly unusual step of embedding a partial transcript in their official statement on the shooting. lapdonline.org/newsroom/offic…
I say "partial" b/c LAPD has also said that the caller followed Petit for some distance. That transcript is not included here, likely b/c it would contradict the intention of the excerpt above, which is to suggest Petit was brandishing a weapon/engaged in threatening behavior.