unseen1 Profile picture
Sep 18, 2020 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
There is a talking point going around that needs addressed. The talking point is that Trump didn't pick the best people or he didn't fill his administration properly. While this is subjective in many ways, I thought it important enough to lay out some facts so your opinion is
...better informed. The biggest fact to keep in mind when thinking on this subject is the advice and consent requirement of the Senate in confirmation of Trump's adminstration. Trump faced a historic blockage by the Senate both democrats and republicans of his picks.
There have been people waiting literally years for confirmation. In other words, Trump didn't have the power to staff his administration as he wanted too. He was forced to pick people that the Senate would confirm and even then it was a battle to get each confirmation.
This led to Trump picking people like Kelly, Mattis, Coats, and keeping people long passed their expiration date like Comey. This is just a fact and can not be ignored when talking about Trump's picks.

Trump made the best of this by talking up these people. Trying to get them
...on his side by inflating their egos. When it became clear these people would not work with Trump and actively sought to undermine him he fired them.

Trump was then faced with having to go back to the Senate for confirmation. He picked a different way and moved people
...that had already been confirmed around to different positions. One to undermine their power by removing them from their core support within their departments and two not needing the Senate to confirm.

Another way Trump side stepped the Senate and the uniparty was by
...appointing "acting department heads" these people didn't need confirmation but they could only serve for a limited time per the law.
The uniparty acting to protect their interests as well as the deep state made it very difficult for Trump to staff the government. That is just a fact and considering the obstacles that Trump faced I think he did a hell of a job with the picks he made.
I think time after time it was shown that Trump went out of his way to work with what he had and make the best out of a bad situation. His record of achievements over the last four years show this.
A final point on this, because of the historic blockage and stonewalling of the Senate, Trump used family members and trusted friends more than most administrations. This was why many people tried to constantly attack his daughter and son in law as "liberals".
Trump's close circle were effective and got results. As the recent Mideast peace process shows these results were often behind the scenes and not reported. The fake media instead pounced on the daily drama and made it seem like Trump didn't pick good people.
All in all, I think Trump did a great job in his picks considering the forces he was working against. Sure, it would have been nice if McConnell would have worked with him on staffing besides the judges. It would have been great if the GOP in the Senate got behind MAGA but
...life doesn't usually match fantasies and Trump instead of giving up found ways around their obstruction and accomplished great things over the last four years. Hopefully, when he wins in Nov the obstruction will stop and Trump can finally get the staffing he wants. We will see

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with unseen1

unseen1 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @unseen1_unseen

Feb 26
Think about this for a second. IF Trump only got his previous 240,000 votes that he received in 2016, then he would have lost. Nikki got 298,000 votes very high for an SC primary. It was almost as if some people ran the numbers and decided that ~300k votes would win.
Then Trump blew the doors off with his record-setting votes...if one was looking at it in a conspiracy minded fashion, one could possibly say that the anti-trump faction made a faulty assumption based on where they believed Trump's numbers would fall. 🤔 and instead of
...a successful ambush, they were routed. One could also look and realize that a lot of money was spent in SC to set up that ambush, and a lot of people thought it would work. This would explain all the discombobulated talking heads last night... and big donors pulling out today
Read 4 tweets
Feb 11
People ask if 2020 was rigged, what's to stop them from rigging 2024? Nothing, really. They are already doing it in plan sight with the DOJ& friendly judges, attempts to remove him from the ballot, playing with voting laws, etc. So,some lose hope. However, I look at FL Miami Dade
It was a hot bed of fraud for years until one person was removed. Now it's much better, and it only took the removal of one person and a form resolve to change it. The people doing fraud is a small% based on population. If people are resolved to make fair and free elections
...a thing, then it will happen. If they allow the tiny few to play their games, it won't. There is a lot of hope and evidence that things can be changed by the people being resolved and resolute. There is little hope and little evidence that things change when they aren't.
Read 4 tweets
May 26, 2023
The Sackett decision is a prime example of the media lying to you. It's was a 9-0 decision. That means every justice conservative, liberal, maga voted to end the reign of terror of the epa with regards to the waters of the US. All 9 did that. But if you read some of the media
...they want you to believe it was a 5-4 decision and that it was a conservative rewrite of the law. Which isn't the case. The court voted 9-0. They differed on what defines a wetland. With 4 people wanting to keep the "nexus" agreement that justice Kennedy made up out of thin..
..air in 2006. Much like the justices came up with Roe arguments to square the circle. The 5 justices rejected that argument, instead stated wetlands had to be "connected" to navigable interstate waterways to fall under federal oversight, while 4 thought the nexus argument could
Read 6 tweets
May 25, 2023
Let's leave DeSantis out of this equation. When did we as a people accept that it was okay for our leaders to lie constantly to us and then not have any consequences for those lies? Was it Clinton, and his depends on what "is" is?
Or was it before that. I remember Bush saying, "Read my lips no new taxes," then being punished for that lie by not being reelected. But that I think was the last time any major consequences happened to a politician who lied. I mean, that's fine, i guess.
...but if we have come to accept that our leaders are nothing but liars, why do we elect them knowing they are lying and will lie to us? Seems like, I don't know, not a good recipe for success or accountability. Sure, we all hear, "but that's what a politician does." However,
Read 5 tweets
May 25, 2023
Look, take this for what it is. I try not to be a person who goes around with blinders on. I support President Trump because during his four years, he did more to further the cause of Americaism than any modern president except maybe Reagan.
Did he make some mistakes? Sure. Does he bullshit a lot, sure. But on the other hand, he kept his promises to the best of his ability, fighting the good fight. He loves this country, and he doesn't want a "new world order." He wants America to be the best country and its citizens
.....to have the best standard of living we can have. He tries to put America and all its citizens first regardless of their race, gender or political leaning, and for that, he will continue to have my support. Whereas the vast majority of politicians and leaders put themselves
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22, 2023
As you celebrate Earth Day, remember that one of the co-founders of this special day killed his girlfriend and composted her in his closet. Ira Enihorn was the master of ceremonies on that first earth day back in 1970, and though he preached free love& non-violence, he killed...
.....his girlfriend in a fit of rage when she left him, stuffed her battered, beaten body into a trunk in his closet& left her to compost for 18 months. It wasn't until her composted remains leaked out of the trunk and through the ceiling of the person living in the apartment
...below that police discovered the composted body. After his arrest, he did what most good socialists do. He jumped bail, changed his name, and fled to Europe. It took 23 years before they finally got their man. Of course, the other socialists that founded Earth Day, distanced
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(