Bans on WeChat and TikTok violate the First Amendment by restricting our ability to communicate and conduct important transactions.
Restricting WeChat in particular will harm many communities with loved ones in China.
The move reflects Trump’s xenophobic and racist agenda.
Millions of people in the United States use WeChat as a primary or only form of communication with family, friends, and other contacts in China. Without it, we will have difficulty maintaining some of life’s essential connections.
Many people and groups will be impacted by this ban.
Immigrants use WeChat to stay in touch with family members.
Universities use it to engage with international students.
Journalists use it to gather information and contact sources.
Chinese immigrant communities in the US have built robust online spaces on WeChat. These communities foster friendships, small business growth, and many of the hallmarks of other social platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
WeChat is also an essential communication channel for workers who do business in both the US and China. And it is used by businesses of all sizes to find customers and send payments.
Users, especially the elderly or less tech-savvy, who have only become familiar with WeChat, could lose access to the vital social relationships that it enables.
This is especially troubling during the pandemic, when many of us depend heavily on digital communication.
Privacy harms from data collection by apps are real but other foreign-owned apps, and US companies like Facebook and Google, collect similar info. To begin addressing these harms Congress should enact comprehensive surveillance reform and strong consumer data privacy legislation.
🗣️ We’ll say it again: Trump’s choice to selectively ban TikTok and WeChat transactions is an abuse of emergency powers that furthers his xenophobic agenda and hurts immigrants.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: The AP just called the 2024 presidential election for Donald Trump.
We’re clear-eyed about the chaos and destruction a second Trump administration will cause to our nation.
That’s why we’re done with handwringing, admiring the problem, or waiting anxiously to see which unlawful action President-elect Trump will take on Day One. We are ready to take action the minute Trump takes the oath of office.
President-elect Trump will keep his promise to target the 'enemy within,' a.k.a. anyone who disagrees with him.
He is dead serious about seeking retribution against political opponents and deploying federal law enforcement to shut down protests.
But we have a 105-year track record of fighting such abuses of power.
President-elect Trump has been crystal clear about plans to deport one million immigrants every year. Past attempts at immigration raids have shown there is no way to deport one million immigrants without violating due process and engaging in racial discrimination.
The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act was reintroduced in the Senate today, nearly a month after Sonya Massey, a Black woman, was murdered in her home by a white police officer.
The Senate has neglected to hold a vote on this bill for years despite bipartisan passage in the House.
We’re calling on Congress to strengthen and improve the bill to more comprehensively address police misconduct and brutality, and pass this legislation once and for all.
Qualified immunity prevents victims of police violence from holding officials liable, and protects officers who engage in egregious misconduct.
We need a robust system in place that prevents officers from evading accountability.
The Pentagon continues to send equipment made for the battlefield to police departments across the country, allowing police forces to wreak havoc on our communities.
Federal law must prohibit use of this dangerous technology by law enforcement agencies.
BREAKING: We’re representing the NRA at the Supreme Court in their case against New York’s Department of Financial Services for abusing its regulatory power to violate the NRA’s First Amendment rights.
The government can’t blacklist an advocacy group because of its viewpoint.
We don’t support the NRA's mission or its viewpoints on gun rights, and we don’t agree with their goals, strategies, or tactics.
But we both know that government officials can't punish organizations because they disapprove of their views. nytimes.com/2023/12/09/us/…
If the Supreme Court doesn’t intervene, it will create a dangerous playbook for state regulatory agencies across the country to blacklist or punish any viewpoint-based organizations — from abortion rights groups to environmental groups or even ACLU affiliates.
BREAKING: We're suing Tennessee for their “aggravated prostitution” statute that targets people with HIV with harsh punishment and lifetime sex offender registration.
This law is unconstitutional and disproportionately affects Black and transgender women.
The law elevates engaging in sex work from a misdemeanor to a felony based on someone's HIV status – a protected disability.
People who are convicted must register as violent sex offenders for the rest of their lives, restricting their access to housing, employment, and social services.
Three years ago today, the murder of George Floyd in broad daylight by a Minneapolis police officer sparked the largest protests against police brutality in U.S. history.
George Floyd should still be alive.
George Floyd's murder demonstrated what we've known for too long: The policing institutions in our country are deeply entrenched in racism and violence.
We cannot allow it to continue.
Since June 2020, many cities and states have passed important but modest reforms, strengthening oversight of police departments and banning chokeholds and no-knock warrants.
BREAKING: We’re asking a federal court to block two provisions of an anti-voter law in Georgia that make it harder for people with disabilities to vote.
As it is now, the law makes it a felony for friends, neighbors, or staff who work in shelters or nursing homes to help people receive or return an absentee ballot, even if the person has a disability.
The law also requires counties to move ballot drop boxes indoors and limits their hours.
For people with mobility disabilities, this made turning in their ballot an arduous and painful ordeal — and for some it makes voting inaccessible altogether.