Sean T at RCP Profile picture
Sep 20, 2020 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
This is actually a major contingency point in US history. LBJ convinced Goldberg to resign so he could appoint his friend Abe Fortas to the Court, knowing that Fortas would give him a heads' up if the Court was going to find his legislation unconstitutional. 1/
By the end of LBJ's second term, there was an overwhelming liberal majority: Warren, Marshall, Fortas, Douglas, and Brennan. Yes, Brennan was the swing justice on that Court, which did things like declaring shopping malls to be state actors subject to the 1st Amendment. 2/
Warren was afraid he wouldn't make it through Nixon's term if he won, so in June of 1968 he announced his retirement. LBJ quickly nominated Fortas for the position. But the Fortas nomination ran into trouble over allegations of impropriety and 3/
LBJ offended majority leader Russell by not nominating a district court candidate he favored. Plus, the "conservative coalition" of Rs and Southern Ds thought that they might prefer Nixon's choice over LBJ's. 4/
So, the Fortas nomination failed on a vote held October 1 of 1968. As it turned out, Fortas actually was a crook, though not because of the concerns raised pre-vote. So ultimately, he had to resign, and Nixon got to name two justices in his first year. 5/
That wasn't quite the end of the Warren Court, but replacing two of its more liberal members with Burger and Blackmun did move the Court rightward (and Potter Stewart decided that he wouldn't overrule any Warren Court precedent 5-4). 6/
So if LBJ doesn't pressure Goldberg to head over to be UN Ambassador so he can appoint a crony (who *was* an outstanding lawyer and good justice aside from poor judgment outside of his decisions), LBJ probably names Warrens' replacement. 7/
And here's the rub: Goldberg lived until 1990. So you probably have a very, very liberal Supreme Court majority, with William Brennan as the swing justice, until Douglas' retirement in 1975. Heck, 8/
Douglas might well have refused to retire -- senility and incontinence be damned! -- until 1977 in this scenario, enabling Carter to name his replacement. And that is how LBJ's replacement of Arthur Goldberg changed the course of history, bigly.
(9/10) 10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean T at RCP

Sean T at RCP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanTrende

Oct 23
And FWIW, my meta-take on the election is this: I thought Harris would walk away with it when she got the nomination, because the calendar was so favorable. Nominee -> Veep pick -> Convention -> Debate -> Early Voting starts. 1/
What I missed was that, by not going through a primary process, she never really had a chance to define herself. I have no idea what her elevator pitch is, except Not Trump. Which is not a terrible pitch, but I'm not sure it's a winning one either. 2/
In fact, I thought the debate was a kind of missed opportunity; sure she dragged Donald Trump across the stage by the combover for the final 80 minutes, but you didn't really come away with a great sense of who she is. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jan 2
On supposed conservative hypocrisy re Gay (setting aside whether plagiarism really =s "canceling") there's a deep split among conservatives going back to the (highly consequential, in hindsight) @DavidAFrench vs. @SohrabAhmari fight. Rufo, Linsday and Gov. DeSantis 1/
are clearly in the Ahmari camp. That camp basically boils down to "if they want a war, we'll give them a war good and hard." There's no hypocrisy there. They're clear that they're coming for lefties, even if it means losing some conservatives in the process. 2/
The conservatives in the French camp have been, from what I can see, ambivalent about the Gay affair. Some are willing to be gracious, some think the plagiarism can be separated from the motivation of those who bring it, some are genuinely undecided. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Dec 14, 2023
The biggest re-alignment of the last 100 yrs -- the sudden movement of Black voters from Republicans to Democrats -- caught both parties utterly flat-footed in 1936. In some ways it made no sense: Democrats still had segregationists throught their party. 1/
But for most, the economic issues trumped the social issues (interestingly, wealthier Blacks stayed Republican until the 1960s). Rs didn't fully appreciate those voters weren't coming back until the 60s. Italians flipped R in 1940 because of a speech FDR gave. 2/
In 2000, everyone, and I mean like @CharlieCookDC and @StuPolitics (both of whom I followed religiously at the time) were skeptical about WV going R. Even at the time, I doubt if anyone appreciated where it would be in 20 years.NH did a similar move in reverse from '88 - '96. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Dec 13, 2023
I've been saying this over and over again, but: This is why inflation is so destructive to presidencies. With unemployment, overwhelming # of people are still employed, lots of unemployed expect to get hired back, etc. When you get your job, it's largely done. 1/
Inflation is different. People at all income levels notice it, whether it's the $10 happy meal or the $150 Outback delivery or [whatever good someone really rich buys and notices, I don't know]. 2/
You notice it when you think about moving, and realize the interest rate on the loan you could get is like 3x what you're paying. If you have credit card debt or floating debt, your interest on that explodes. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Dec 11, 2023
So I finally had the time to sit down and look at the questions below the headline in that WSJ poll and, um . . . wow.

s.wsj.net/public/resourc…
Trump has double digit leads on being able to best handle the economy, inflation, crime, securing the border, the Ukraine War, and the Israeli conflict. Biden has a double digit lead on abortion rights. Everything else is single digits which sounds good except . . . 1/
things like healthcare policy and social security are *supposed* to be double digit Democratic leads. But what really catches my eye are the personal attribute questions. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Aug 9, 2023
Today is my son Judson's 16th Birthday. Sixteen years ago, I thought about how on today we'd drive together to the DMV, get his driver's license, and how proud I'd be of him for passing, and frankly myself for teaching him how to drive, the way my Dad taught me and his him. 1/
That's not how today is going. Judd was diagnosed with autism at age 2.5. At the time, his doctor said he just had a "touch" of autism. I viewed it as a roadbump. To the extent I'm smart, it isn't in a traditional way, it's in a "think way outside the box" way. 2/
(today I recognize that ability to make weird connections no one else does as my own form of autism-ish behavior, which I've been able to redirect in a positive way, but anyway). I knew I could fix this, the way I'd been able to fix almost every other problem I'd encountered. 3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(