Wokal Distance Profile picture
Sep 21, 2020 19 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/
Ever wonder why Universities produce so much wokeness?

The answer is 'Activist Scholars': woke professors who have decided that the goal of a University is to ideologically indoctrinate students and spread activist propaganda.

They admit this, and I have receipts

A Thread🧵
2/
See, the problem is NOT merely that some professors have blind-spots that need to be corrected by having lots of other professors with different views. That issue is important, but that is not what I am talking about.

Activists Scholars are an entirely different problem.
3/
The Scholar Activist sees their job to do activism in the classroom including using their classroom in the University to train more woke activists

This Paper by Kia M. Q. Hall is about activities for training Black Lives Matter activists in the classroom.
4/
You see, the Scholar Activist does not even attempt to teach from neutral ground. They have an ideology, and use their classroom to train students to become activists on behalf of that ideology.

Here Deborah Lowry suggests a way to teach that "supports student-activists":
5/
This isn't bias and blind-spots, this is activists deciding the classroom is a place for them to teach and train activists to agitate on behalf of woke ideology.

But it goes further; many of these professors explicitly admit they no longer care about telling the truth...
6/
Here, Kelly Oliver says the quiet part out loud.

She says feminist theories do NOT have to be true or false...they have to be STRATEGIC. The truth does not matter, strategy does.
This is because, she says, feminism has to be revolutionary; and she means *REVOLUTIONARY*
7/
Not to be outdone, professor Joan Scott tells us that they seek a theory that will be relevant for political practice, and Sociologist Raewyn Connell seeks a theory of Gender that takes politics into account.
8/
These professors are saying, very explicitly, that they are publishing in academic journals, and teaching in University classrooms, a set academic theories which exist ENTIRELY for the purpose of doing woke activist politics.

This isn't bias, it's indoctrination.
9/
You see the fruit of this sort of activist training in the situation that occurred at Evergreen State college when student activists took over the Campus.

Here, students tell the faculty of the college they just took over they learned their activism FROM THAT SAME FACULTY.
10/
The faculty of evergreen turned their students into activists, who turned around and used their activist training to take over the college and demand the already woke college become even more woke.

Woke professors caught in a feedback loop of wokeness of their own creation
11/
I hope thus far you have seen that there is a good sized segment of the University that has decided that rather then pursue truth and seek to be a neutral in the classroom as possible, they are going to pursue politics, and use the classroom to indoctrinate the students.
12/
So how did they manage to do that?

To understand that you need to understand what tenure.
Tenure means that a professor can be terminated only for cause under extraordinary circumstances. It is almost impossible to fired once as a professor if you have tenure.
13/
Woke academics who have gotten tenure, use their positions to help as many other woke people get tenure as possible.

Here, Henry Giroux explains how he helped **100** people get tenure, and how he sees doing so as being an important "political intervention."
14/
This means a couple of things.
The first is that these professors can publish woke papers in academic journals, which makes their ideology look legitimate. This is like laundering money, except in this case the thing being laundered is activist ideology.

The second is....
15/
A professor with tenure is nearly impossible to fire. Even if they get caught teaching activist ideology they can't be fired, and that means they are free to propagandize and indoctrinate without fear of being fired.

Are we beginning to see what's happening here?
16/
The woke are taking over Universities by helping each other get tenure, so they can keep indoctrinating students in the classrooms while publishing their woke ideology in journals so it gets treated like real science, scholarship, and knowledge.
17/
What gets left out by the woke is the truth, because the woke are not interested in trying to find out and teach about how the world really is.

Here, Kelly Oliver talks about how to divorce science from nature, so that feminists can take over science with feminist ideology.
18/
They are telling us what they are doing, and they are being clear about it. They mean what they say, and they say what they mean.
We need to take these people at face value and start believing us when they tell us who they are and what they are doing.
19/
There are no easy answers here but we can start by showing people what is going on and sharing this information widely. Then we can start figuring out a strategy to counter wokeness in the University.

let's get to work

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Mar 22
The left painted Christianity as a cringy, outdated, stuffy, religion of oppressors, so now leftist women looking for faith are picking the only religion they're allowed to like (Islam codes as brown so it can't be criticized), even though it makes the handmaids tale look tame.
Women on the left outnumber men on the left by a HUGE majority, and refuse to date right wing men. So a huge number of leftist women are therefore competing for a tiny number of leftist men. So Leftist women have almost no leverage when negotiating the terms of a relationship...
And because leftist women have adopted feminist liberation and consent morality, they have no morally consistent way to demand that men commit to them or settle down; as long as everything is consensual, leftist women have no moral grounds to demand men stop "dating around"...
Read 28 tweets
Mar 18
1/
Carney gives the appearance of getting things done, so people see him as accomplishing things, defending Canada and making change happen.

This will hold for a while, his support is rock solid.

However, Carney is headed towards a brutal recession, and *stagflation*

/🧵
2/
There is a difference between a recession and stagflation. A recession is just when an economy shrinks, and you usually get high unemployment and low productivity.

Recessions are bad, (no one likes unemployment) but they're nothing compared to the monster known as STAFLATION
3/
Stagflation is when you get a combinations of high inflation, high unemployment, stagnant growth, and lower productivity. And that combination of inflation, low productivity/growth and unemployment leaves the government with no good policy options for solving it because...
Read 14 tweets
Feb 18
This kind of joke is becoming popular on the left, and I think it's because on a subconscious level they know they're all just using social justice as an excuse to create theories they can tactically deploy to grab the upper hand in social situations. Image
Whenever they don't get what they want they invoke social justice discourses (feminism, Critical Race Theory, BLM, decolonization, etc) as a way to get the moral leverage they need to get the upper hand in whatever interaction they are having
And they do this constantly in interpersonal interactions and personal relationships, where they invoke social justice jargon in order to grab moral authority within the conversation so they can get what they want.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
The biggest problem with letting illegal immigrants stay is that it is unjust. Why does nobody make this simple point?

It is unjust to ask immigrants who come legally to work for years to become citizens while letting those who enter illegally to be rewarded with citizenship.
When there is a set clear of fair rules for how immigration is to be done in a in orderly fashion, it is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to break the rules, skip to the front of the line, and then be rewarded with visas or citizenship just because left wing activists demand it
It is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to be rewarded for breaking the law and skipping to the front of the line. It doesn't matter if you feel empathy for the person doing the law breaking and the line skipping - it is unjust to reward that person with residency in the country
Read 8 tweets
Jan 10
Leftists are having a tough time with Venezuelans celebtrating Maduro's arrest and the persians overthrowing Irans Islamic regime, because it means the people are rejecting both the communist and islamic halves of the leftists new islamo-communist/third world marxist coalition.
The left wanted to harnass the energy around the palestinian issue and use it to advance western marxism. So, they created an alliance between western marxist activists and Islamic fundamentalists/Hamas supporters using third-world marxism and postcolonial theory as the bridge.
They thought by getting the popular support of global south "subaltern" third-world groups, along with the support of the Islamic world, they would have a coalition big enough the challenge the United States, and which they would control by virtue of having organized it.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 17, 2025
1/
The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) created a DEI program focused on:

-Power, privilege, and oppression
-Understanding microaggressions
-Centering Native Voices in Atmospheric Sciences
-Knowledge that "does not come from science"

Wokeness at NCAR

A thread🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
2/
The NCAR had two programs. The first was called UNIEON (which stands for "UCAR/NCAR Equity and Inclusion program"), and the second was a program they funded called "rising voices," which was about bringing "indigenous knowledge" into science.

And it's funded by tax dollars. Image
Image
3/
The goal of the DEI program (UNIEON) was to bring DEI into the NCAR, and then get the participants to start implementing the DEI ideology via "Bystander intervention." That is, it invites people to insert themselves into other peoples social interactions in order to spread DEI Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(